e10vk
2010
10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the
fiscal year ended January 1, 2011
Commission file number 1-7685
AVERY DENNISON
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
95-1492269
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
150 North Orange Grove Boulevard
Pasadena, California
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
91103
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(626) 304-2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Not applicable.
Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates as of July 3, 2010, the last
business day of the registrants most recently completed
second fiscal quarter, was $3,369,883,051.
Number of shares of common stock, $1 par value, outstanding
as of January 29, 2011: 106,874,924.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the
Parts of this report below indicated:
|
|
|
Document
|
|
Incorporated by reference into:
|
|
Portions of Annual Report to Shareholders for fiscal year ended
January 1, 2011
|
|
Parts I, II
|
Portions of Definitive Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held April 28, 2011
|
|
Parts III, IV
|
AVERY
DENNISON CORPORATION
FISCAL
YEAR 2010
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PART I
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
|
(Removed and Reserved)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
|
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
PART I
Company
Background
Avery Dennison Corporation (Avery Dennison, the
Company, Registrant, or
Issuer, and which may be referred to as
we or us) was incorporated in 1977 in
the state of Delaware as Avery International Corporation, the
successor corporation to a California corporation of the same
name that had been incorporated in 1946. In 1990, the Company
merged one of its subsidiaries into Dennison Manufacturing
Company (Dennison), as a result of which Dennison
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and in
connection with which the Companys name was changed to
Avery Dennison Corporation. You can learn more about us by
visiting our Web site at www.averydennison.com. Our Web site
address provided in this annual report on
Form 10-K
is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information
on our Web site is not and should not be considered part of this
report and is not incorporated by reference in this report.
Business
Overview and Reporting Segments
Our businesses include the production of pressure-sensitive
materials, office and consumer products and a variety of
tickets, tags, labels and other converted products. Some
pressure-sensitive materials are sold to label printers and
converters that convert the materials into labels
and other products through embossing, printing, stamping and
die-cutting. Some are sold by us in converted form as printable
media, tapes and reflective sheeting. We also manufacture and
sell a variety of office and consumer products, other converted
products and items not involving pressure-sensitive components,
such as binders, organizing systems, markers, fasteners,
business forms, as well as tickets, tags, radio-frequency
identification (RFID) inlays and labels, and
imprinting equipment and related services for retail and apparel
manufacturers.
We are subject to certain risks described in Risk
Factors (Part I, Item 1A) and Legal
Proceedings (Part I, Item 3), including those
normally attending international and domestic operations, such
as changes in economic or political conditions in the regions in
which we conduct business, currency fluctuations, exchange
control regulations and the effect of international relations
and domestic affairs of foreign countries on the conduct of
business, competitors, tax legislation, legal proceedings, and
the availability and pricing of raw materials.
No single customer represented 10% or more of our net sales in,
or trade receivables at year end of, 2010 or 2009. However, as
of January 1, 2011, the ten largest customers by net sales
and trade receivables represented 12% and 13%, respectively, and
were primarily concentrated in our Office and Consumer Products
segment. The financial position and operations of these
customers are monitored on an ongoing basis (see Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates in Part II,
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Results of Operations and Financial Condition). United
States export sales are not a significant part of our business.
Backlog is not considered material in the industries in which we
compete.
Our reporting segments are:
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials;
|
|
|
|
Retail Information Services; and
|
|
|
|
Office and Consumer Products.
|
In addition to our reporting segments, we have other specialty
converting businesses comprised of several businesses that
produce specialty tapes and highly engineered labels including
RFID inlays and labels, and other converted products.
In 2008, we completed the acquisition of DM Label Group
(DM Label), a manufacturer of labels, tags and
tickets for retail and apparel applications, including woven
labels. These operations are included in our Retail Information
Services segment. See Retail Information Services
Segment below for further information.
1
In 2010, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment contributed
approximately 56% of our total sales, while the Retail
Information Services and Office and Consumer Products segments
contributed approximately 23% and 13%, respectively, of our
total sales.
In 2010, international operations constituted a substantial
majority of our business, representing approximately 68% of our
sales. We expanded our operations, focusing particularly on
Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe. As of January 1,
2011, we operated approximately 200 manufacturing and
distribution facilities worldwide, employed approximately
32,000 persons, and conducted business in over 60 countries.
Pressure-sensitive
Materials Segment
Our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment manufactures and sells
Fasson-, JAC-, and Avery Dennison-brand pressure-sensitive roll
materials, Avery-brand graphics and graphic films, Avery
Dennison-brand reflective products, and performance polymers
(largely used to manufacture pressure-sensitive materials). The
business of this segment tends not to be seasonal, except for
certain outdoor graphics and reflective products and operations
in Western Europe. Pressure-sensitive materials consist
primarily of papers, plastic films, metal foils and fabrics,
which are coated with Company-developed and purchased adhesives,
and then laminated with specially coated backing papers and
films. They are sold in roll or sheet form with either solid or
patterned adhesive coatings, and are available in a wide range
of face materials, sizes, thicknesses and adhesive properties.
These materials are sold to label printers and converters for
labeling, decorating, fastening, electronic data processing and
special applications on a worldwide basis.
A pressure-sensitive, or self-adhesive, material is one that
adheres to a surface by press-on contact. It generally consists
of four elements: a face material, which may be paper, metal
foil, plastic film or fabric; an adhesive, which may be
permanent or removable; a release coating; and a backing
material to protect the adhesive against premature contact with
other surfaces, and which can also serve as the carrier for
supporting and dispensing individual labels. When the products
are to be used, the release coating and protective backing are
removed, exposing the adhesive, and the label or other face
material is pressed or rolled into place.
Because self-adhesive materials are easy to apply without the
need for adhesive activation, the use of self-adhesive materials
often provides cost savings compared with other materials that
require heat- or moisture-activated adhesives. When used in
package decoration applications, the visual appeal of
self-adhesive materials often helps foster increased sales of
the product on which the materials are applied. Self-adhesive
materials provide consistent and versatile adhesion and are
available in a large selection of materials in nearly any size,
shape and color.
Graphic products consist of a variety of films and other
products sold to the architectural, commercial sign, digital
printing, and other related market segments. We also sell
durable cast and reflective films to the construction,
automotive, and fleet transportation market segments,
scrim-reinforced vinyl material for banner sign applications,
and reflective films for traffic and safety applications. Our
graphics and reflective businesses are organized on a worldwide
basis to serve the expanding commercial graphic arts market
segment, including wide-format digital printing applications. We
also manufacture and sell proprietary films that are used for
outdoor, weather-resistant applications.
Performance polymer products include a range of solvent- and
emulsion-based acrylic polymer adhesives, protective coatings
and other polymer additives for internal use, as well as for
sale to other companies.
In this segment, our larger roll materials competitors are
Raflatac (Raflatac), a subsidiary of UPM-Kymmene
(UPM), and Morgan Adhesives (MACtac), a
division of Bemis Company, Inc. For graphics and reflective
products, our largest competitor is 3M Company. We believe that
entry of competitors into the field of pressure-sensitive
adhesives and materials is limited by technical knowledge and
capital requirements. We believe that our technical knowledge,
relative size and scale of operations, ability to serve our
customers with a broad line of quality products and service
programs, distribution and brand strength, and development and
commercialization of new products are among the more significant
factors in maintaining and further developing our competitive
position.
2
Retail
Information Services Segment
Our Retail Information Services segment designs, manufactures
and sells a wide variety of brand identification and information
management products for retailers, apparel manufacturers,
distributors and industrial customers on a worldwide basis. The
business of this segment tends to be seasonal, with higher
volume generally in advance of the fall
(back-to-school),
spring, and holiday shipping periods.
Our brand identification products include woven and printed
labels, graphic tags and barcode tags. Our information
management products include price tickets, carton labels, RFID
tags and printing applications. Services include supply chain
and security management, and retail store efficiency. Our
solution-enabling products include printers, fastening and
application devices, and security management products.
In this segment, our competitors include SML Group and
Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and Shore to Shore, Inc. We believe
that our ability to serve our customers consistently wherever
they manufacture with product innovation, comprehensive brand
identification and information management product line, and
global distribution network, service, and quality are the key
advantages in maintaining and further developing our competitive
position.
Office
and Consumer Products Segment
The Office and Consumer Products segment manufactures and sells
a wide range of Avery-brand printable media and other products.
The business of this segment tends to be seasonal, with higher
volume related to the
back-to-school
season.
This segments products are concentrated in a few major
customers, primarily office products superstores, mass market
distributors and wholesalers. The loss of one or more of these
customers could have a material adverse effect on the
segments financial results. We manufacture and sell a wide
range of Avery-brand products for office, school and home uses:
printable media, such as copier, ink-jet and laser printer
labels, related computer software, ink-jet and laser printer
card and index products; and organization, filing and
presentation products, such as binders, dividers and sheet
protectors. We also offer a wide range of other stationery
products, including writing instruments, markers, adhesives and
specialty products under brand names such as Avery,
Marks-A-Lot
and HI-LITER. The extent of our product offerings varies by
geographic market.
In this segment, our larger competitors are 3M Company, Acco
Brands Corporation, Esselte Corporation and manufacturers of
private-label brands. We believe that our brand strength,
customer relationships, service excellence, large installed base
of software that facilitates the use of many of our products,
ability to serve our customers with a broad line of quality
products, and development and commercialization of new products
are among the more significant factors in maintaining and
further developing our competitive position.
Other
specialty converting businesses
Other specialty converting businesses include our specialty
tape, industrial, performance films and automotive products,
business media, RFID and security printing businesses. These
businesses manufacture and sell specialty tapes, highly
engineered films, RFID inlays and labels, pressure-sensitive
postage stamps and other converted products. These businesses
are generally not seasonal, except for certain automotive
products due to plant shutdowns by automotive manufacturers.
The specialty tape business manufactures and sells single- and
double-coated tapes and adhesive transfer tapes for use in
non-mechanical fastening, bonding and sealing systems in various
industries, which are sold to industrial and medical original
equipment manufacturers, converters, and disposable diaper
producers worldwide. These products are sold in roll form and
are available in a wide range of face materials, sizes,
thicknesses and adhesive properties.
Our automotive businesses primarily consist of custom
pressure-sensitive and heat-seal labels, pressure-sensitive
films and engineered fasteners for the automotive market
segment. These products are sold primarily to original equipment
manufacturers and their suppliers.
3
Our industrial businesses consist of custom pressure-sensitive
labels and multi-layer film constructions for durable goods,
electronics and consumer packaged goods. These products are sold
primarily to original equipment manufacturers, tier suppliers
and packaging converters.
Our performance films business produces a variety of decorative
and functional films, primarily for the automotive industry,
that are designed for injection mold applications.
Our business media business designs and markets customized
products for printing and information workflow applications.
Our RFID business manufactures RFID inlays and labels and makes
use of our existing distribution by marketing to our label
converting customers.
Our security printing business manufactures and sells
self-adhesive battery labels to a battery manufacturer, and
self-adhesive stamps to the U.S. Postal Service.
In addition, we sell specialty print-receptive films to the
industrial label market segment, metallic pigments to the
packaging industry, and proprietary wood grain and other
patterns of film laminates for housing exteriors.
We compete with a number of diverse businesses. Our largest
competitor for this group of businesses is 3M Company in
the specialty tape business. We believe that entry of
competitors into these specialty converting businesses is
limited by capital and technical requirements. We believe that
our ability to serve our customers with quality, cost effective
products and newly-developed and commercialized products are
among the more significant factors in developing and maintaining
our competitive position.
Segment
Financial Information
Certain financial information on our reporting segments and
other specialty converting businesses for the three years ended
January 1, 2011 appears in Note 12, Segment
Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in our 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders
(our 2010 Annual Report) and is incorporated herein
by reference.
Foreign
Operations
Certain financial information about our geographic areas for the
three years ended January 1, 2011 appears in Note 12,
Segment Information, in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in our 2010 Annual Report and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Research
and Development
Many of our current products are the result of our research and
development efforts. Our expenses for research, design and
testing of new products and applications by our operating units
and the Avery Research Center located in Pasadena, California
(the Research Center) were $95.6 million in
2010, $90.7 million in 2009, and $94 million in 2008.
Our operating units research efforts are directed
primarily toward developing new products and operating
techniques and improving product performance, often in close
association with customers. The Research Center supports our
operating units patent and product development work, and
focuses on improving adhesives, materials and coating processes,
as well as related product applications and ventures. These
efforts often focus on projects relating to printing and coating
technologies, as well as adhesive, release and ink chemistries.
Patents,
Trademarks and Licenses
The loss of individual patents or licenses would not be material
to us taken as a whole, nor to our operating segments
individually. Our principal trademarks are Avery, Fasson, Avery
Dennison and the Companys symbol. We believe these
trademarks are significant in the market segments in which our
products compete.
4
Manufacturing
and Environmental Matters
We use various raw materials, primarily paper, plastic films and
resins, as well as specialty chemicals purchased from various
commercial and industrial sources, which are subject to price
fluctuations. Although shortages could occur from time to time,
these raw materials are generally available.
We produce a majority of our self-adhesive materials using
water-based emulsion and hot-melt adhesive technologies.
Emissions from these operations contain small amounts of
volatile organic compounds, which are regulated by agencies of
federal, state, local and foreign governments. We continue to
evaluate the use of alternative materials and technologies to
minimize these emissions.
A portion of our manufacturing process for self-adhesive
materials utilizes certain organic solvents which, unless
controlled, would be emitted into the atmosphere. Emissions of
these substances are regulated by agencies of federal, state,
local and foreign governments. In connection with the
maintenance and acquisition of certain manufacturing equipment,
we invest in solvent capture and control units to assist in
regulating these emissions.
We have developed adhesives and adhesive processing systems that
minimize the use of solvents. Emulsion adhesives, hot-melt
adhesives or solventless silicone systems have been installed in
our facilities in Peachtree City, Georgia; Fort Wayne and
Greenfield, Indiana; Painesville, Ohio; and Quakertown,
Pennsylvania; as well as in other plants in the United States,
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, Colombia, France,
Germany, India, Korea, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the
Netherlands, South Africa, Thailand and the United Kingdom.
Based on current information, we do not believe that the cost of
complying with applicable laws regulating the discharge of
materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the
protection of the environment, will have a material effect upon
our capital expenditures, consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
For information regarding our potential responsibility for
cleanup costs at certain hazardous waste sites, see Legal
Proceedings (Part I, Item 3) and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition (Part II,
Item 7).
Available
Information
Our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed with, or furnished to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 are available free of charge on our Web site at
www.averydennison.com (in the Investors section) as
soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing with or
furnishing to the SEC. We make available on our Web site our
(i) Corporate Governance Guidelines, (ii) Code of
Conduct, which applies to our directors, officers and employees,
(iii) Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and
Senior Financial Officers, (iv) the charters of the Audit,
Compensation and Executive Personnel, and Governance and Social
Responsibility Committees of our Board of Directors, and
(v) Audit Committee Complaint Procedures for Accounting and
Auditing Matters. These materials are also available free of
charge in print to stockholders who request them by writing to:
Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 150 North Orange Grove
Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91103.
Our ability to attain our goals and objectives is materially
dependent on numerous factors and risks, including but not
limited to, the following:
As a
manufacturer, our sales and profitability are dependent upon the
cost and availability of raw materials and energy, which are
subject to price fluctuations, and our ability to control or
pass on costs of raw materials and labor. Raw material cost
increases could adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
The pricing environment for raw materials used in a number of
our businesses continues to be challenging and volatile.
Additionally, energy costs remain volatile and unpredictable.
Inflationary and other increases in the costs of raw materials,
labor and energy have occurred in the past, recurred in 2010 and
thus far in 2011, and are expected
5
to recur. Our performance depends in part on our ability to pass
on these cost increases to customers through our selling prices
for products and to effect productivity improvements. Depending
on market dynamics and the terms of customer contracts, our
ability to recover these costs through increased pricing may be
limited. Also, it is important for us to obtain timely delivery
of materials, equipment, and other resources from suppliers, and
to make timely delivery to customers. It is possible that any of
our supplier relationships could be interrupted due to natural
and other disasters or other events, or be terminated in the
future. A disruption to our supply chain could adversely affect
our sales and profitability, and any sustained interruption in
our receipt of adequate supplies could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We are
affected by competitive conditions and customer preferences. If
we do not compete effectively, we could lose market share and
experience falling prices, adversely affecting our financial
results.
We are at risk that our competitors will expand in our key
market segments and implement new technologies making them more
competitive. Competitors also may be able to offer additional
products, services, lower prices, or other incentives that we
cannot or will not offer or that will make our products less
profitable. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
compete successfully against current and future competitors.
We also are at risk with regard to changes in customer order
patterns, such as changes in the levels of inventory maintained
by customers and the timing of customer purchases, which may be
affected by announced price changes, changes in our incentive
programs, or changes in the customers ability to achieve
incentive goals. Changes in customers preferences for our
products can also affect the demand for our products. Our
business could be negatively impacted by a decline in demand for
our products.
The
demand for our products is impacted by the effects of, and
changes in, worldwide conditions, which could have an adverse
effect on our sales and profitability.
We conduct business in over 60 countries and our domestic and
international operations are strongly influenced by matters
beyond our control, including changes in political, social,
economic and labor conditions, tax laws (including
U.S. taxes on foreign subsidiaries), and international
trade regulations (including tariffs), as well as the impact of
these changes on the underlying demand for our products.
Changes
in tax legislation throughout the world could materially impact
our results.
Our future effective tax rate and related tax balance sheet
attributes could be impacted by changes in tax legislation
throughout the world. In particular, proposed U.S. tax
legislation could materially impact our results. Currently, the
majority of our revenue is generated from customers located
outside of the U.S., and a substantial portion of our assets and
employees are located outside of the U.S. We have not
accrued income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on
undistributed earnings for most
non-U.S. subsidiaries,
because those earnings are intended to be indefinitely
reinvested in the operations of those subsidiaries. Certain
proposals could substantially increase our tax expense, which
would substantially reduce our income and have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows from
operating activities.
Changes
in economic conditions in the regions in which we conduct
business could negatively impact our customers, suppliers and
business.
A decline in economic activity in the United States and other
regions of the world can result in adverse effects on our
business, including, among other things, reduced consumer
spending, inflation, declines in asset valuations, diminished
liquidity and credit availability, significant volatility in
securities prices, rating downgrades, and fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates. The most recent declines in
economic conditions were experienced in the United States,
Europe, and Asia and adversely affected our customers, suppliers
and businesses similar to ours and resulted in a variety of
negative effects, such as reduction in revenues, increased
costs, lower gross margin percentages, increased allowances for
doubtful accounts
and/or
write-offs of accounts receivable, and required recognition of
impairments of capitalized assets, including goodwill and other
intangibles. A decline in economic conditions could also have
other material adverse effects on our business, results of
operations, financial condition
6
and cash flows. We are not able to predict the duration and
severity of adverse economic conditions in the U.S. and
other countries, and there can be no assurance that there will
not be further declines in economic activity.
Foreign
currency exchange rates, and fluctuations in those rates, may
affect our reported sales and profitability.
In 2010, approximately 68% of our sales were from international
operations. Fluctuations in currencies can cause transaction,
translation and other losses to us, which could negatively
impact our sales and profitability. Margins on sales of our
products in foreign countries could be materially and adversely
affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
We monitor our foreign currency exposures and may, from time to
time, use hedging instruments to mitigate exposure to changes in
foreign currencies. Hedging activities may only offset a portion
of the adverse financial effects of unfavorable movements in
foreign exchange rates over the limited time the hedges are in
place.
Our
future profitability may be adversely affected if we generate
less productivity improvement than projected.
We intend to continue efforts to reduce costs in many of our
operations through facility closures, headcount reductions,
organizational restructuring, process standardization, and
manufacturing relocation, by using a variety of tools, such as
Lean Sigma and Kaizen events, to increase productivity. However,
the success of these efforts is not assured and lower levels of
productivity could reduce profitability. In addition, cost
reduction actions could expose us to additional production risk
and loss of sales.
We have
acquired companies and may continue to acquire other companies.
Acquisitions come with significant risks and uncertainties,
including those related to integration, technology and
personnel. In addition, divestures of any of our businesses or
product lines could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
To grow our product lines and expand into new markets, we have
made acquisitions, including our acquisitions of Paxar
Corporation in June 2007 and DM Label Group in April 2008, and
may do so in the future. Various risks, uncertainties, and costs
are associated with the acquisitions. Effective integration of
systems, controls, objectives, personnel, product lines, market
segments, customers, suppliers, and production facilities and
cost savings can be difficult to achieve, and the results of
integration actions are uncertain, particularly given our
geographically dispersed organization. In addition, we may not
be able to retain key personnel of an acquired company and we
may not be able to successfully execute integration strategies
or achieve projected performance targets for the business
segment into which an acquired company is integrated. Both
before and after the closing of an acquisition, our business and
those of the acquired company or companies may suffer due to
uncertainty or diversion of management attention. There can be
no assurance that any acquisitions will be successful and
contribute to our profitability and we may not be able to
identify new acquisition opportunities in the future.
We continually evaluate the performance of our businesses and
may determine to sell a business or product line. Divestures may
result in significant write-offs or impairments of assets,
including goodwill and other intangible assets. Divestitures may
involve additional risks, including separation of operations,
products and personnel, diversion of management attention,
disruption to our other businesses and loss of key employees. We
may not successfully manage these or other risks we may confront
in divesting a business or product line, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
Our
customer base is diversified, but in certain portions of our
business, industry concentration has increased the importance,
and decreased the number, of significant customers.
Sales of our office and consumer products in the United States
are concentrated in a few major customers, principally office
product superstores, mass market distributors and wholesalers.
The business risk associated with this concentration, including
increased credit risks for these and other customers, and the
possibility of related bad debt write-offs, could negatively
affect our margins and profits.
7
Possible
increased difficulty in the collection of receivables as a
result of economic conditions or other market factors could have
a material effect on our results from operations and anticipated
cash from operating activities.
Although we have processes to administer credit granted to
customers and believe our allowance for doubtful accounts is
adequate, we have experienced, and in the future may experience,
losses as a result of our inability to collect our accounts
receivable. The financial difficulties of a customer could
result in reduced business with that customer. We may also
assume higher credit risk relating to receivables of a customer
experiencing financial difficulty. If these developments occur,
our inability to shift sales to other customers or to collect on
our trade accounts receivable from major customers could
substantially reduce our income and have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and cash flows from
operating activities.
Our
inability to develop and successfully market new products and
applications could compromise our competitive
position.
The timely introduction of new products and improvements in
current products helps determine our success. Research and
development for each of our operating segments is complex and
uncertain and requires innovation and anticipation of market
trends. We could focus on products that ultimately are not
accepted by customers or we could suffer delays in production or
launch of new products that could compromise our competitive
position.
For us to
remain competitive, it is important to recruit and retain
highly-skilled employees. We also utilize various outsourcing
arrangements for certain services, and related delays, resource
availability, or errors may lead to increased costs or
disruption in our business.
There is significant competition to recruit and retain skilled
employees. Due to expansion in certain markets and the ongoing
productivity efforts and recent employee reductions, it may be
difficult for us to recruit and retain sufficient numbers of
highly-skilled employees.
We have outsourced certain services to third-party service
providers, and may outsource other services in the future to
achieve cost savings and efficiencies. Service provider delays,
resource availability, business issues or errors may lead to
disruption in our businesses
and/or
increased costs. If we do not effectively develop, implement and
manage outsourcing strategies, if third-party providers do not
perform effectively and in a timely manner, or if we experience
problems with a transition, we may not be able to achieve our
expected cost savings, and may have to experience delays or
incur additional costs to correct errors made by these service
providers.
Significant
disruption to our information technology infrastructure could
adversely impact our operations, sales, customer relations, and
financial results.
We rely on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of a large
and complex information technology infrastructure to link our
worldwide divisions. Like other information technology systems,
ours is susceptible to a number of factors including, but not
limited to, damage or interruptions resulting from a variety of
causes such as obsolescence, natural disasters, power failures,
human error, viruses and data security breaches. We upgrade and
install new systems, which, if installed or programmed
incorrectly or on a delayed timeframe, could cause delays or
cancellations of customer orders, impede the manufacture or
shipment of products, or disrupt the processing of transactions.
We have implemented certain measures to reduce our risk related
to system and network disruptions, but if a disruption occurs,
we could incur significant losses and remediation costs.
Additionally, we rely on services provided by third-party
vendors for a significant portion of our information technology
support, development and implementation, which may make our
operations vulnerable to these third parties failure to
perform adequately.
Miscalculation
of our infrastructure needs could adversely impact our financial
results.
Projected requirements of our infrastructure investments may
differ from actual levels if our volume growth is not as we
anticipate. Our infrastructure investments generally are long
term in nature, and it is possible that these investments may
not generate our expected return due to changes in the
marketplace, failures to complete
8
implementation, or other factors. Significant changes from our
expected need for
and/or
returns on infrastructure investments could adversely affect our
financial results.
Our
reputation, sales, and earnings could be affected adversely if
the quality of our products and services does not meet customer
expectations.
There are occasions when we manufacture products with quality
issues resulting from defective materials, manufacturing,
packaging or design. Many of these issues are discovered before
shipping, thus causing delays in shipping, delays in the
manufacturing process, and occasionally cancelled orders. When
issues are discovered after shipment, it can result in
additional shipping costs, discounts, refunds, and loss of
future sales. Both pre-shipping and post-shipping quality issues
can result in adverse financial consequences and a negative
impact on our reputation.
Some of
our products are sold by third parties.
Our products are not sold only by us, but by third-party
distributors and retailers as well. Some of our distributors
also market products that compete with our products. Changes in
the financial or business conditions or the purchasing decisions
of these third parties or their customers could affect our sales
and profitability.
We
outsource some of our manufacturing. If there are significant
changes in the quality control or financial or business
condition of these outsourced manufacturers, our business could
be negatively impacted.
We manufacture most of our products, but we also use third-party
manufacturers, for example, for specialty jobs or capacity
overflow. Outsourced manufacturers reduce our ability to prevent
product quality issues, late deliveries, customer
dissatisfaction and compliance with customer requirements for
labor standards. Because of possible quality issues and customer
dissatisfaction, deficiencies in the performance of outsourced
manufacturers could have an adverse effect on our business or
financial results.
Changes
in our business strategies may increase our costs and could
affect the profitability of our businesses.
As changes in our business environment occur, we may need to
adjust our business strategies to meet these changes or we may
find it otherwise necessary to restructure our operations or
particular businesses. When these changes occur, we may incur
costs to change our business strategy and may need to write down
the value of selected assets. We also may need to invest in new
businesses that have short-term returns that are negative or low
and whose ultimate business prospects are uncertain. In any of
these events, our costs may increase, our assets may be
impaired, or our returns on new investments may be lower than
prior to the change in strategy.
If our
indebtedness increases significantly or our credit ratings are
downgraded, we may have difficulty obtaining acceptable short-
and long-term financing from the capital markets.
The overall level of indebtedness and our credit ratings are
significant factors in our ability to raise short-term and
long-term financing. Higher debt levels could negatively impact
our ability to meet other business needs or opportunities and
could result in higher financing costs. The credit ratings
assigned to us also impact the interest rates on our commercial
paper and other borrowings. If our credit ratings are
downgraded, our financial flexibility could decrease and the
cost to borrow would increase. At January 1, 2011, our
variable rate borrowings were approximately $380 million.
Fluctuations in interest rates can increase borrowing costs and
have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
The level
of returns on pension and postretirement plan assets and the
actuarial assumptions used for valuation purposes could affect
our earnings and cash flows in future periods. Changes in
accounting standards and government regulations could also
affect our pension and postretirement plan expense and funding
requirements.
Assumptions used in determining projected benefit obligations
and the fair value of plan assets for our pension plan and other
postretirement benefit plans are evaluated by us in consultation
with outside actuaries. In the event that we determine that
changes are warranted in the assumptions used, such as the
discount rate, expected long-term rate of return, or health care
costs, our future pension and projected postretirement benefit
expenses and funding
9
requirements could increase or decrease. Because of changing
market conditions or changes in the participant population, the
actuarial assumptions that we use may differ from actual
results, which could have a significant impact on our pension
and postretirement liability and related costs. Funding
obligations are determined based on the value of assets and
liabilities on a specific date as required under relevant
government regulations for each plan. Future pension funding
requirements, and the timing of funding payments, could be
affected by legislation enacted by the relevant governmental
authorities.
Our share
price may be volatile.
Changes in our stock price may affect our access to, or cost of
financing from, capital markets and may affect our stock-based
compensation arrangements, among other things. Our stock price,
which has at times experienced substantial volatility, is
influenced by changes in the overall stock market and demand for
equity securities in general. Other factors, including our
financial performance, on a standalone basis and relative to our
peers and competitors, and market expectations for our future
performance, the level of perceived growth of our industries,
and other company-specific events, can also impact our share
price. There can be no assurance that our stock price will be
less volatile in the future.
An
impairment in the carrying value of goodwill could negatively
impact our consolidated results of operations and net
worth.
Goodwill is initially recorded at fair value and is not
amortized, but is reviewed for impairment at least annually (or
more frequently, if impairment indicators are present). In
assessing the carrying value of goodwill, we make estimates and
assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates, and
discount rates based on our business plans, economic
projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data.
There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and
managements judgment in applying these factors. Goodwill
valuations have been calculated using an income approach based
on the present value of future cash flows of each reporting
unit. We could be required to evaluate the carrying value of
goodwill prior to the annual assessment if we experience
disruptions to the business, unexpected significant declines in
operating results, divestiture of a significant component of our
business or sustained market capitalization declines. These
types of events and the resulting analyses resulted in a
significant goodwill impairment charge in 2009 related to our
Retail Information Services segment and could result in other
goodwill impairment charges in the future. Impairment charges
could substantially affect our financial results in the periods
of such charges, as did the one in 2009.
Potential
adverse developments in legal proceedings, investigations and
other legal, compliance and regulatory matters, including those
involving product and trade compliance, Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act issues and other matters, could impact us
materially.
Our financial results could be materially and adversely impacted
by an unfavorable outcome to pending or future litigation and
investigations, including but not limited to, proceedings or
lawsuits related to class actions seeking treble damages for
alleged unlawful competitive practices, and other legal,
compliance and regulatory matters, including, but not limited
to, product, customs and trade compliance matters. See
Legal Proceedings (Part I, Item 3). There
can be no assurance that any investigation or litigation outcome
will be favorable.
Infringing
intellectual property rights of third parties or inadequately
acquiring or protecting our intellectual property could harm our
ability to compete or grow.
Because our products involve complex technology and chemistry,
we are involved, from time to time, in litigation involving
patents and other intellectual property. Parties have filed, and
in the future may file, claims against us alleging that we have
infringed their intellectual property rights. If we are held
liable for infringement, we could be required to pay damages,
obtain licenses or cease making or selling certain products.
There can be no assurance that licenses will be available on
commercially reasonable terms or will be available at all. The
defense of these claims, whether or not meritorious, and the
development of new technology could cause us to incur
significant costs and divert the attention of management.
10
We also have valuable intellectual property upon which third
parties may infringe. We attempt to protect and restrict access
to our intellectual property and proprietary information by
relying on the patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret
laws of the U.S. and other countries, as well as
non-disclosure agreements. However, it may be possible for a
third party to obtain our information without our authorization,
independently develop similar technologies, or breach a
non-disclosure agreement entered into with us. In addition, many
of the countries in which we operate do not have intellectual
property laws that protect proprietary rights as fully as in the
U.S. The use of our intellectual property by someone else
without our authorization could reduce or eliminate certain
competitive advantages we have, cause us to lose sales or
otherwise harm our business. Further, the costs associated with
protecting our intellectual property rights could adversely
impact our profitability.
We have obtained and applied for some U.S. and foreign
trademark registrations and patents, and will continue to
evaluate whether to register additional trademarks and seek
patents as appropriate. We cannot guarantee that any of the
pending applications will be approved by the applicable
government authorities. Further, we cannot assure that the
validity of our patents or our trademarks will not be
challenged. In addition, third parties may be able to develop
competing products using technology that avoids our patents.
We need
to comply with numerous environmental, health, and safety
laws.
Due to the nature of our business, we are subject to
environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations,
including those related to the disposal of hazardous waste from
our manufacturing processes. Compliance with existing and future
environmental, health and safety laws could subject us to future
costs or liabilities; impact our production capabilities;
constrict our ability to sell, expand or acquire facilities; and
generally impact our financial performance. We have accrued
liabilities for environmental
clean-up
sites, including sites for which governmental agencies have
designated us as a potentially responsible party, where it is
probable that a loss will be incurred and the cost or amount of
loss can be reasonably estimated. See Legal
Proceedings (Part I, Item 3). However, because
of the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment
and remediation activities, future expense to remediate
currently identified sites and other sites, which could be
identified in the future for cleanup, could be higher than the
liabilities accrued.
Healthcare
reform legislation could have an impact on our
business.
During 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 were
signed into law in the United States. Certain of the provisions
that could most significantly increase our healthcare costs in
the near term include the removal of annual plan limits, the
changes in rules regarding eligibility for dependents and the
mandate that health plans cover 100% of preventative care. In
addition, our healthcare costs could increase if the new
legislation and accompanying regulations require us to cover
more employees than we do currently or pay penalty amounts in
the event that employees do not elect our offered coverage.
While much of the cost of the recent healthcare legislation
enacted will occur in or after 2014 due to provisions of the
legislation being phased in over time, changes to our healthcare
cost structure could have an impact on our business and
operating costs.
We are
subject to risks associated with the availability and coverage
of various types of insurance.
We have various types of insurance, including property,
workers compensation and general liability. Insurance
costs can be unpredictable and may adversely impact our
financial results. We retain some portion of our insurable
risks, and therefore, unforeseen or catastrophic losses in
excess of insured limits could have a material adverse effect on
our financial results.
Changes
in our tax rates could affect our future results.
Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in
the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax
rates, expirations of tax holidays, changes in the valuation of
deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in tax laws and
regulations or their interpretation. We are subject to the
regular examination of our income tax returns by various tax
authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse
outcomes resulting from these
11
examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for
taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these
examinations will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and operating results.
The
amount of various taxes we pay is subject to ongoing compliance
requirements and audits by federal, state and foreign tax
authorities.
Our estimate of the potential outcome of uncertain tax issues is
subject to our assessment of relevant risks, facts, and
circumstances existing at that time. We use these assessments to
determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and
other tax-related accounts. Our future results may include
favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax
liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved,
which may impact our effective tax rate
and/or our
financial results.
We have
deferred tax assets that we may not be able to use under certain
circumstances.
If we are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income in
certain jurisdictions, or if there is a significant change in
the time period within which the underlying temporary
differences become taxable or deductible, we could be required
to increase our valuation allowances against our deferred tax
assets. This would result in an increase in our effective tax
rate and would have an adverse effect on our future operating
results. In addition, changes in statutory tax rates may change
our deferred tax assets or liability balances, with either
favorable or unfavorable impact on our effective tax rate. Our
deferred tax assets may also be impacted by new legislation or
regulation.
The risks described above are not exclusive. If any of the above
risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, cash
flows or financial condition could suffer, which might cause the
value of our securities to decline.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS.
|
None.
As of January 1, 2011, we operated approximately 40
principal manufacturing facilities in excess of
100,000 square feet. The locations of such principal
facilities and the operating segments for which they presently
are used are as follows:
Pressure-sensitive
Materials Segment
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Peachtree City, Georgia; Fort Wayne, Greenfield and Lowell,
Indiana; Fairport Harbor, Mentor and Painesville, Ohio; and
Quakertown, Pennsylvania
|
Foreign
|
|
Vinhedo, Brazil; Kunshan, China; Champ-sur-Drac, France; Gotha
and Schwelm, Germany; Rodange, Luxembourg; Alphen and
Hazerswoude, the Netherlands; Pune, India; and Cramlington,
United Kingdom
|
Retail
Information Services Segment
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Greensboro and Lenoir, North Carolina; Miamisburg, Ohio
|
Foreign
|
|
Kunshan, Nansha, Panyu, Shenzen, and Suzhou, China; Loehne and
Sprockhovel, Germany; Ancarano, Italy; and Taichung, Taiwan
|
Office
and Consumer Products Segment
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Chicopee, Massachusetts; and Meridian, Mississippi
|
Foreign
|
|
Oberlaindern, Germany; and Juarez and Tijuana, Mexico
|
12
Other
specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Schererville, Indiana; Painesville, Ohio; and Clinton, South
Carolina
|
Foreign
|
|
Turnhout, Belgium; and Kunshan, China
|
In addition to our principal manufacturing facilities described
above, our other principal facilities include our corporate
headquarters facility and research center in Pasadena,
California, and our divisional offices located in Brea,
California; Framingham, Massachusetts; Mentor, Ohio; Hong Kong
and Kunshan, China; Leiden, the Netherlands; and Zug,
Switzerland.
We own all of our principal properties identified above, except
for certain facilities in Brea, California; Hong Kong and
Panyu, China; Loehne, Oberlaindern, and Sprockhovel, Germany;
Juarez, Mexico; Greensboro, North Carolina; Mentor, Ohio; and
Zug, Switzerland, which are leased.
All buildings owned or leased are considered suitable and
generally adequate for our present needs. We generally expand
production capacity and provide facilities as needed to meet
increased demand. Owned buildings and plant equipment are
insured against major losses from fire and other usual business
risks, subject to deductibles. We are not aware of any material
defects in title to, or significant encumbrances on, our
properties except for certain mortgage liens.
|
|
Item 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS.
|
As of January 1, 2011, we have been designated by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party
(PRP) at fourteen waste disposal or waste recycling
sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil
and/or
groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of our
liability has been agreed. We are participating with other PRPs
at such sites, and anticipate that our share of cleanup costs
will be determined pursuant to remedial agreements entered into
in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other
governmental authorities.
We have accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites,
including sites in which governmental agencies have designated
us as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will be incurred
and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.
However, because of the uncertainties associated with
environmental assessment and remediation activities, future
expense to remediate the currently identified sites and any
sites that could be identified in the future for cleanup could
be higher than the liabilities accrued.
As of January 1, 2011, our estimated accrued liability
associated with environmental remediation was approximately
$46 million. See also Note 8,
Contingencies, in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements of our 2010 Annual Report, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior
Court for the County of Los Angeles, California, a purported
class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock
against us, UPM and Raflatac, seeking treble damages and other
relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, with
allegations including that the defendants attempted to limit
competition among themselves through anticompetitive
understandings. Three similar complaints were filed in various
California courts. In November 2003, on petition from the
parties, the California Judicial Council ordered the cases be
coordinated for pretrial purposes. The cases were assigned to a
coordination trial judge in the Superior Court for the City and
County of San Francisco on March 30, 2004. On
September 30, 2004, the Harman Press amended its complaint
to add MACtac as a defendant. On January 21, 2005, American
International Distribution Corporation filed a purported class
action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court
for Chittenden County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by
Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court
of Johnson County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on
February 16, 2005, in the District Court of Scotts Bluff
County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a
purported multi-state class action on behalf of indirect
purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke County, Tennessee.
Without admitting liability, we agreed to pay plaintiffs
$2 million to resolve all claims related to the purported
state class actions in the states of Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee
and Vermont. Those settlements were approved by the Tennessee
court on March 12, 2010 and the complaints in those state
actions were dismissed with prejudice. We recorded
$2 million in the third quarter of 2009 in respect of the
settlement of those claims, and made that payment on
December 28, 2009. Also without admitting liability, we
paid $2.5 million on July 15, 2010 to resolve all
claims in the California action.
13
On December 8, 2010, the California court granted final
approval of the settlement and dismissed all claims against us
with prejudice. In respect of settlement of this claim, we
recorded $.7 in the fourth quarter of 2009 and $.3 million
and $1.5 million in the first and second quarters of 2010,
respectively.
We are involved in various other lawsuits, claims, inquiries,
and other regulatory and compliance matters, which are either
routine to the nature of our business, or based upon current
information, if determined to be adverse to us, are not expected
to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(REMOVED
AND RESERVED).
|
14
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters
The information called for by subsections (a) of this Item
appears under Corporate Information Stock and
Dividend Data in our 2010 Annual Report and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
On January 27, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of up to 5 million additional shares
of the Companys outstanding common stock, increasing the
balance of shares available for repurchase to approximately 6
million. Repurchased shares may be reissued under the
Companys stock option and incentive plans or used for
other corporate purposes.
Repurchases by the Company or affiliated purchasers
(as defined in
Rule 10b-18(a)(3)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of registered
equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2010 are listed
in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
Average Price
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
that may yet
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
Paid per
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
be Purchased Under
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Share
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
the Plans
|
|
|
(Shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
October 3, 2010 October 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2010 November 27, 2010
|
|
|
433.9
|
|
|
$
|
37.77
|
|
|
|
433.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 28, 2010 January 1, 2011
|
|
|
2,249.3
|
|
|
$
|
41.03
|
|
|
|
2,249.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,683.2
|
|
|
$
|
40.50
|
|
|
|
2,683.2
|
|
|
|
1,269.7
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares do not include the impact of .3 million repurchased
shares that settled in January 2011 and 5 million
additional shares that were authorized for repurchase in January
2011. |
|
|
Item 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA.
|
Selected financial data for each of the Companys last five
fiscal years appears under Five-year Summary in our
2010 Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATION AND FINANCIAL
CONDITION.
|
The information called for by this Item is contained under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition in our 2010 Annual
Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
|
The information called for by this Item is contained under
Market-Sensitive Instruments and Risk Management in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition in our 2010 Annual
Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
|
The information called for by this Item is contained in our 2010
Annual Report (including the Consolidated Financial Statements
and the Notes thereto, Statement of Management Responsibility
for Financial Statements and
15
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting, and the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm) and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES.
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of its management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
or 15d-15(e)
of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
of the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the
participation of the Companys management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the
Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its
internal control over financial reporting based upon the
framework in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that
evaluation, the Companys management concluded that its
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
January 1, 2011. (See Managements Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting in our 2010 Annual Report.)
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
January 1, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
in their Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
in our 2010 Annual Report, and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. There have been no changes in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting during
the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION.
|
None.
16
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
|
The information concerning directors and corporate governance
called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from
the definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on April 28, 2011 (our 2011
Proxy Statement), which will be filed with the SEC
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end
of the fiscal year covered by this report. The information
concerning executive officers called for by this Item appears on
the next page of this report. The information concerning any
late filings under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, is incorporated by reference from our
2011 Proxy Statement.
We have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer
and Senior Financial Officers (the Code), which
applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
and Controller. Our Code is available on our Web site,
www.averydennison.com, in the Investors section. We
will satisfy disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K
regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, any provision of the
Code that applies to these officers disclosing the nature of
such amendment or waiver on our Web site or in a current report
on
Form 8-K.
Our Code of Conduct, which applies to our directors, officers
and employees, is also available on our Web site in the
Investors section. Our Web site address is not
intended to function as a hyperlink, and the contents of the Web
site are not a part of this
Form 10-K,
nor are they incorporated herein by reference.
The information concerning our Audit Committee called for by
this Item is incorporated by reference from our 2011 Proxy
Statement, which will be filed with the SEC pursuant to
Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the
fiscal year covered by this report.
17
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF AVERY
DENNISON(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Former Positions and Offices
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
since
|
|
with Avery Dennison
|
|
Dean A.
Scarborough(2)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
August 1997
|
|
2005-2010
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Chairman, President and Chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000-2005
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell R. Butier
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
March 2007
|
|
2007-2010
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting Officer
|
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2006
|
|
Vice President, Finance, Retail Information Services
|
Lori J. Bondar
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
June 2010
|
|
2008-2010
|
|
Vice President, Controller
|
Vice President, Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-2008
2004-2005
|
|
Consultant, Palomar Consulting
Group(3)
Chief Financial Officer, Acetex
Corporation(3)
|
Diane B. Dixon
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
December 1985
|
|
1997-2000
|
|
Vice President, Worldwide
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications and Advertising
|
Communications and Corporate Affairs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anne Hill
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
May 2007
|
|
2004-2006
|
|
Vice President,
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Human Resources,
|
Chief Human Resources Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chiron
Corporation(3)
|
Robert M. Malchione
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
August 2000
|
|
2000-2001
|
|
Senior Vice President,
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Strategy
|
Corporate Strategy and Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan C. Miller
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
March 2008
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
Vice President and General Counsel
|
General Counsel and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998-2006
|
|
Assistant General Counsel
|
Karyn E. Rodriguez
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
June 2001
|
|
1999-2001
|
|
Assistant Treasurer, Corporate Finance
|
Vice President and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Investments
|
Timothy G. Bond
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
March 2008
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
Vice President and General Manager,
|
Group Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office Products Group
|
Office Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003-2006
|
|
Vice President and General Manager, Office Products North America
|
Timothy S. Clyde
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
February 2001
|
|
2001-2007
|
|
Group Vice President, Office Products
|
Group Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Materials and Converting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Shawn Neville
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
June 2009
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
|
Group Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boathouse
Sports(3)
|
Retail Information Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2008
|
|
President, Keds Division, Collective Brands,
Inc.(3)
|
Donald A. Nolan
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
March 2008
|
|
2005-2007
|
|
Senior Vice President, Global Packaging
|
Group Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Automotive Coatings,
|
Roll Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valspar
Corporation(3)
|
John M. Sallay
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
March 2009
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
Senior Vice President, Strategy,
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staples,
Inc.(3)
|
New Growth Platforms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2007
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Manifold
|
Roll Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products(3)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All officers are elected to serve a one-year term and until
their successors are elected and qualify. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Scarborough was initially elected Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer effective April 22, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Business experience during past five years prior to service with
the Company. |
18
|
|
Item 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION.
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by
reference from our 2011 Proxy Statement, which will be filed
with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this
report.
|
|
Item 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by
reference from our 2011 Proxy Statement, which will be filed
with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this
report.
|
|
Item 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE.
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by
reference from our 2011 Proxy Statement, which will be filed
with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this
report.
|
|
Item 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by
reference from our 2011 Proxy Statement, which will be filed
with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this
report.
19
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
EXHIBITS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedule and
Exhibits
(1) (2) Financial statements and financial statement
schedule filed as part of this report are listed in the
accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Financial
Statement Schedule.
(3) Exhibits filed as a part of this report are listed in
the Exhibit Index, which follows the financial statements
and schedules referred to above. Each management contract or
compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an
exhibit to this
Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 15(c) is identified as such on the
Exhibit Index.
(b) The Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of
Regulation S-K,
are set forth on the accompanying Exhibit Index attached
hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.
(c) The financial statement schedules required by
Regulation S-X,
which are excluded from our 2010 Annual Report by
Rule 14a-3(b)(1)
and which are required to be filed as a financial statement
schedule to this report, are set forth on the accompanying Index
to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule and are
incorporated herein by reference.
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/
Mitchell R. Butier
|
Mitchell R. Butier
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Dated:
February 25, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and as of the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dean
A. Scarborough
Dean
A. Scarborough
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mitchell
R. Butier
Mitchell
R. Butier
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lori
J. Bondar
Lori
J. Bondar
|
|
Vice President and Controller, and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bradley
A. Alford
Bradley
A. Alford
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter
K. Barker
Peter
K. Barker
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Rolf
Börjesson
Rolf
Börjesson
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
T. Cardis
John
T. Cardis
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ken
C. Hicks
Ken
C. Hicks
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter
W. Mullin
Peter
W. Mullin
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
E. I. Pyott
David
E. I. Pyott
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Debra
L. Reed
Debra
L. Reed
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick
T. Siewert
Patrick
T. Siewert
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Julia
A. Stewart
Julia
A. Stewart
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
22
AVERY
DENNISON CORPORATION
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL
STATEMENT
SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data incorporated by reference from the attached portions of the
2010 Annual Report to Shareholders of Avery Dennison Corporation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 1, 2011 and
January 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for 2010,
2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Management Responsibility for Financial Statements
and Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
majority-owned subsidiaries. Investments representing less than
20 percent are accounted for using the cost method of
accounting.
With the exception of the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Statement of Management Responsibility for Financial Statements
and Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm thereon listed above, and certain information
referred to in Items 1, 5, 6, 7, and 7A of this report, the
information for which is included in the Companys 2010
Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by
reference, the Companys 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders
is not to be deemed filed as part of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data submitted herewith:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other schedules are omitted since the required information
is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to
require submission of the schedule, or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto.
S-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To the Board of Directors
of Avery Dennison Corporation:
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements and of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
referred to in our report dated February 25, 2011 appearing in
the 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders of Avery Dennison
Corporation (which report and consolidated financial statements
are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K)
also included an audit of the financial statement schedule
listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this
Form 10-K.
In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated
financial statements.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 25, 2011
S-2
SCHEDULE VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Costs and
|
|
From
|
|
Deductions
|
|
at End
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
From
Reserves(a)
|
|
of Year
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
41.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
Allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
Inventory reserve
|
|
|
65.4
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
|
|
59.2
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
115.6
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
41.8
|
|
|
$
|
11.5
|
|
|
$
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
41.3
|
|
Allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Inventory reserve
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
(24.6
|
)
|
|
|
65.4
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
45.8
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
41.8
|
|
Allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Inventory reserve
|
|
|
77.3
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
(37.9
|
)
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
147.6
|
|
|
|
(45.3
|
)
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Deductions from reserves include currency translation
adjustments. |
S-3
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on
Form S-3
(File Nos.
333-38905,
333-64558,
333-103204,
333-120239,
333-147369,
and
333-169954)
and
Form S-8
(File Nos.
33-54411,
33-58921,
33-63979,
333-38707,
333-38709,
333-107370,
33-107371,
333-107372,
333-109814,
333-124495,
333-143897,
333-152508,
333-166832,
333-166836,
and
333-166837)
of Avery Dennison Corporation of our report dated February 25,
2011 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
the Companys 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated February 25, 2011 relating to the financial statement
schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 25, 2011
S-4
AVERY
DENNISON CORPORATION
EXHIBIT INDEX
For the
Year Ended January 1, 2011
INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(3
|
.1)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed August 2, 2002
with the Office of Delaware Secretary of State
|
|
|
3
|
(i)
|
|
Third Quarterly Report for 2002 on Form 10-Q, filed November 12,
2002
|
|
(3
|
.1.1)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, as filed April 23, 2010 with the Office of
Delaware Secretary of State
|
|
|
3
|
.1.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 27, 2010.
|
|
(3
|
.2)
|
|
By-laws, as amended and restated on April 22, 2010
|
|
|
3
|
.2.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 27, 2010.
|
|
(4
|
.2)
|
|
Indenture, dated as of March 15, 1991, between Registrant and
Security Pacific National Bank, as Trustee (the
Indenture)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-39491), filed
March 19, 1991
|
|
(4
|
.2.2)
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 16, 1993,
between Registrant and BankAmerica National Trust Company, as
successor Trustee (the Supplemental Indenture)
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-59642), filed
March 17, 1993
|
|
(4
|
.2.5)
|
|
Officers Certificate establishing a series of Securities
entitled Medium-Term Notes, Series C under the
Indenture, as amended by the Supplemental Indenture
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 12, 1995
|
|
(4
|
.2.6)
|
|
Officers Certificate establishing a series of Securities
entitled Medium-Term Notes, Series D under the
Indenture, as amended by the Supplemental Indenture
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 16, 1996
|
|
(4
|
.3)
|
|
Indenture, dated July 3, 2001, between Registrant and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (successor
to Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National
Association), as trustee (2001 Indenture)
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-64558), filed
July 3, 2001
|
|
(4
|
.3.1)
|
|
Officers Certificate establishing two series of Securities
entitled 4.875% Notes due 2013 and
6.000% Notes due 2033, respectively, each under
the 2001 Indenture
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 16, 2003
|
|
(4
|
.3.2)
|
|
4.875% Notes Due 2013
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 16, 2003
|
|
(4
|
.3.3)
|
|
6.000% Notes Due 2033
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 16, 2003
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(4
|
.5)
|
|
Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2007, between Registrant
and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (Bank of
NY)
|
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 1, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.5.1)
|
|
6.625% Subsidiary Notes due 2017
|
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 1, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.6)
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2007, between Registrant and
Bank of NY
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2008
|
|
(4
|
.7)
|
|
Purchase Contract and Pledge Agreement, dated as of November 20,
2007, between Avery Dennison and Bank of NY, as Purchase
Contract Agent, and Bank of NY as Collateral Agent, Custodial
Agent and Securities Intermediary
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.8)
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2007, between Avery Dennison
and Bank of NY
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.9)
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture between Avery Dennison and Bank of
NY, as Trustee, dated as of November 20, 2007
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.10)
|
|
Form of Remarketing Agreement
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.11)
|
|
Form of Corporate HiMEDS Unit Certificate
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.12)
|
|
Form of Treasury HiMEDS Unit Certificate
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.13)
|
|
Form of 5.350% Senior Notes due 2020
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.14)
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture between Avery Dennison and The
Bank of NYTrust Company, as Trustee, dated as of April 13, 2010
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 13, 2010
|
|
(4
|
.15)
|
|
Form of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2020
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 13, 2010
|
|
(4
|
.16)
|
|
Remarketing Agreement between Avery Dennison and the Remarketing
Agent named therein, dated as of September 27, 2010
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 15, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.1)
|
|
Avery Dennison Office Products Company (ADOPC)
Credit Agreement, amended and restated, dated August 7, 2008
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2008 on Form 10-Q, filed August 7,
2008
|
|
(10
|
.1.1)
|
|
ADOPC Second Amendment to Credit Agreement
|
|
|
99
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2009
|
|
(10
|
.2)
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement (RCA), amended and
restated, August 10, 2007
|
|
|
10
|
.2.2
|
|
Third Quarterly Report for 2007 on Form 10-Q, filed November 7,
2007
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(10
|
.2.1)
|
|
Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated RCA
|
|
|
99
|
.4
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2009
|
|
(10
|
.3)
|
|
*Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
1981 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 29, 1982
|
|
(10
|
.4)
|
|
*Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2007
|
|
(10
|
.5)
|
|
*Executive Medical and Dental Plan (description)
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1981 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 29, 1982
|
|
(10
|
.8)
|
|
*Employment Agreement with D.A .Scarborough
|
|
|
10
|
.8.5
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2005 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2005
|
|
(10
|
.8.3)
|
|
*Form of Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.4
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2004 on Form 10-Q, filed May 6, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.8.3.1)
|
|
*Forms of Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.3.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.8.3.2)
|
|
*Forms of Amendment to Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.3.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.8.3.2a)
|
|
*Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.3.2
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.8.3.3)
|
|
*Form of Second Amendment to Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.3.3
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.8.4)
|
|
*Retention Agreement with D.R. OBryant
|
|
|
10
|
.8.6
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2005 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2005
|
|
(10
|
.8.4.1)
|
|
*Amendment to Retention Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.4.1
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.9)
|
|
*Executive Group Life Insurance Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
1982 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 25, 1983
|
|
(10
|
.10)
|
|
*Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and certain
directors and Officers
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
1986 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 27, 1987
|
|
(10
|
.10.1)
|
|
*Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and certain
directors and Officers
|
|
|
10
|
.10.1
|
|
1993 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 18, 1994
|
|
(10
|
.11)
|
|
*Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, amended and restated
(SERP)
|
|
|
10
|
.11.1
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.11.2)
|
|
*Letter of Grant to D.A. Scarborough under SERP
|
|
|
10
|
.11.2.1
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.11.2.1)
|
|
*Letter Agreement with D.A. Scarborough regarding SERP benefits
|
|
|
10
|
.11.2.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 15, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.11.4)
|
|
*Letter of Grant to D.R. OBryant under SERP
|
|
|
10
|
.11.4.1
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.11.4.1)
|
|
*Letter Agreement with D.R. OBryant regarding SERP benefits
|
|
|
10
|
.11.4.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 15, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.12)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.13)
|
|
*Retirement Plan for Directors, amended and restated
|
|
|
10
|
.13.1
|
|
2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 28, 2003
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(10
|
.15)
|
|
*Director Equity Plan, amended and restated (Director
Plan)
|
|
|
10
|
.15.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.15.1)
|
|
*Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement under
Director Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.15.1
|
|
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.16)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Executive Variable
Deferred Compensation Plan (EVDCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.16.1)
|
|
*Amendment No. 1 to EVDCP
|
|
|
10
|
.16.1
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
|
(10
|
.17)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.18)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Directors Variable
Deferred Compensation Plan (DVDCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.18.1)
|
|
*Amendment No. 1 to DVDCP
|
|
|
10
|
.18.1
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
|
(10
|
.18.2)
|
|
*2005 Directors Variable Deferred Compensation Plan,
amended and restated (2005 DVDCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.18.2
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2010 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.19)
|
|
*Stock Option and Incentive Plan, amended and restated
(Stock Plan)
|
|
|
10
|
.19.8
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.1)
|
|
*Forms of NQSO Agreement under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.5
|
|
2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 27, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.2)
|
|
*Forms of Restricted Stock Agreement under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.8
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2005 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2005
|
|
(10
|
.19.3)
|
|
*Forms of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 13, 2006
|
|
(10
|
.19.4)
|
|
*Forms of Equity Awards under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.6
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 30, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.5)
|
|
*Forms of Equity Awards under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.6
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2008 on Form 10-Q, filed May 8, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.6)
|
|
*Forms of Equity Agreements under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.9
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.7)
|
|
*Additional Forms of Equity Agreements under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.10
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.8)
|
|
*Form of Performance Unit Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.19.8
|
|
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 25, 2009
|
|
(10
|
.27)
|
|
*Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan, amended and restated
(LTIP)
|
|
|
10
|
.27.1
|
|
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.28)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Executive Deferred
Retirement Plan (EDRP)
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.28.1)
|
|
*Amendment No. 1 to EDRP
|
|
|
10
|
.28.1
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(10
|
.28.2)
|
|
*Amendment No. 2 to EDRP
|
|
|
10
|
.28.2
|
|
2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 4, 2002
|
|
(10
|
.29)
|
|
*Executive Leadership Compensation Plan, (ELCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.29.1
|
|
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 17, 2005
|
|
(10
|
.30)
|
|
*Senior Executive Leadership Compensation Plan, amended and
restated (SELCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.30.2
|
|
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.31)
|
|
*Executive Variable Deferred Retirement Plan, amended and
restated (EVDRP)
|
|
|
10
|
.31.5
|
|
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.31.1)
|
|
*2004 EVDRP
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-109814), filed
October 20, 2003
|
|
(10
|
.31.2)
|
|
*2005 EVDRP, amended and restated
|
|
|
10
|
.31.2
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2010 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.32)
|
|
*Benefits Restoration Plan, amended and restated
(BRP)
|
|
|
10
|
.32.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.33)
|
|
*Restated Trust Agreement for Employee Stock Benefit Trust
|
|
|
10
|
.33.1
|
|
1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 26, 1998
|
|
(10
|
.33.1)
|
|
*Common Stock Purchase Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 25, 1996
|
|
(10
|
.33.2)
|
|
*Restated Promissory Note
|
|
|
10
|
.33.3
|
|
1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 26, 1998
|
|
(10
|
.34)
|
|
*Amended and Restated Capital Accumulation Plan (CAP)
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
|
(10
|
.34.1)
|
|
*Trust under CAP
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-38707), filed
October 24, 1997
|
|
(10
|
.34.2)
|
|
*Amendment No. 1 to CAP
|
|
|
10
|
.34.2
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
|
(10
|
.35)
|
|
*Key Executive Change of Control Severance Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 9, 2009
|
|
(10
|
.36)
|
|
*Executive Severance Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 9, 2009
|
|
(23
|
.1)
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young
|
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed August 29, 2007
|
|
(23
|
.2)
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young
|
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-147369), filed
November 14, 2007
|
|
(99
|
.2)
|
|
Stock Ownership Policy for Officers and Directors
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
2010 Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed March 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unless otherwise noted, the File
Number for all documents is File
No. 1-7685.
|
|
*
|
|
Management contract or compensatory
plan or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit to this
Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 15.
|
v
SUBMITTED
HEREWITH:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certification of Incorporation, as filed August 2, 2002
with the Office of Delaware Secretary of State, is incorporated
by reference to the Third Quarterly Report for 2002 on
Form 10-Q,
filed November 12, 2002
|
|
3
|
.1.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, as filed April 23, 2010 with the Office of
Delaware Secretary of State, is incorporated by reference to the
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed April 27, 2010
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-laws, as amended and restated, is incorporated by reference
to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 27, 2010
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Avery Dennison Office Products Company (ADOPC)
Credit Agreement, amended and restated, is incorporated by
reference to the Second Quarterly Report for 2008 on Form 10-Q,
filed August 7, 2008
|
|
10
|
.1.1
|
|
ADOPC Second Amendment to Credit Agreement is incorporated by
reference to the current report on Form 8-K, filed January 27,
2009
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement (RCA), amended and
restated, is incorporated by reference to the Third Quarterly
Report for 2007 on Form 10-Q, filed November 7, 2007
|
|
10
|
.2.1
|
|
Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated RCA is
incorporated by reference to the current report on Form 8-K,
filed January 27, 2009
|
|
10
|
.32.1
|
|
*First Amendment to Benefit Restoration Plan
|
|
12
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Changes
|
|
13
|
|
|
Portions of Annual Report to Shareholders for fiscal year ended
January 1, 2011
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (see
page S-4)
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
101INS
|
|
|
**XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101SCH
|
|
|
**XBRL Extension Schema Document
|
|
101CAL
|
|
|
**XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101LAB
|
|
|
**XBRL Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101PRE
|
|
|
**XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed as an Exhibit to this
Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 15. |
|
** |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T,
the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a
registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as may be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings. |
STATEMENT
AND AGREEMENT REGARDING
LONG-TERM DEBT OF REGISTRANT
Unless indicated above, Registrant has no instrument with
respect to long-term debt under which securities authorized
thereunder equals or exceed 10% of the total assets of
Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of its long-term debt
instruments to the Commission upon request.
vi
exv10w32w1
Exhibit 10.32.1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
THE BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN
OF AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
(Amended and Restated Effective
As of December 4, 2008)
Avery Dennison Corporation, a Delaware corporation, (the Company) adopted the
Benefit Restoration Plan of Avery Dennison Corporation (the Plan), effective as of
December 1, 1994 (the Effective Date), for the benefit of its eligible employees. The
Plan has been amended from time to time, and most recently amended by the December 4, 2008
Amendment and Restatement of the Plan (the 2008 Restatement). The Plan constitutes an
unfunded excess benefit plan within the meaning of Section 3(36) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). The Plan is maintained primarily for
the purpose of providing deferred Compensation for a select group of management or highly
compensated employees, within the meaning of ERISA Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3) and 401(a)(1).
In order to freeze the Plan so that no Plan Participant shall accrue any additional Benefit
under the Plan after December 31, 2010, this First Amendment to the 2008 Restatement has been
adopted by the Company, effective as of the dates set forth below. This Amendment, together with
the 2008 Restatement, constitutes the entire Plan as amended to date.
1. Effective as of November 30, 2008, all references to the Dennison Retirement Plan in the
Plan shall change to the Avery Dennison Pension Plan.
2. Effective as of the opening of business on January 1, 2011, the definition of Benefit set
forth in Article I of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
No additional Benefit shall accrue under Article IV of the Plan after December 31,
2010.
3. Effective as of the opening of business on January 1, 2011, the definition of Benefit
Service set forth in Article I of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at the end
thereof:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Participant shall be credited with any Benefit
Service after December 31, 2010.
4. Effective as of the opening of business on January 1, 2011, the definition of Compensation
Unrestricted set forth in Article I of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at
the end thereof:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Compensation Unrestricted shall not include (i)
amounts earned for periods after the last payroll period ending in 2010 and (ii)
bonuses earned for service in 2010 but paid after 2010. However, if a Participant
has a severance from employment before January 1, 2011, his Compensation
Unrestricted shall include amounts paid to him within 30 days after the date of his
severance from employment.
5. Effective as of the opening of business on January 1, 2011, the definition of Qualified
Benefit set forth in Article I of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at the end
thereof:
No Qualified Benefit shall accrue after December 31, 2010.
6. Effective as of the opening of business on January 1, 2011, the definition of Qualified
Benefit Unrestricted set forth in Article I of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the
following at the end thereof:
No Qualified Benefit Unrestricted shall accrue after December 31, 2010.
7. Effective as of November 30, 2008, the definition of Qualified Plan set forth in Article
I of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Qualified Plan shall mean the Associate Plan, a component plan under the Avery
Dennison Pension Plan set forth in Appendix B thereof, as it may be amended from
time to time, or any successor plan. The Avery Dennison Pension Plan is a qualified
employer plan as defined under Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(a)(2).
8. Effective as of November 30, 2008, the definition of the Retirement Plan set forth in
Article I is hereby deleted in its entirety.
9. Effective as of the opening of business on January 1, 2011, the definition of Vested
Benefit set forth in Article I is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end
thereof:
Participants shall continue to accrue years of vesting service under the Qualified
Plan after December 31, 2010.
10. Effective as of the opening of business on January 1, 2011, Section 2.1 of the Plan is
hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
All current Participants on December 31, 2010 shall be on inactive status and shall
cease to accrue additional Benefits after such date. No Employee shall become a
Participant after December 31, 2010.
11. Effective as of November 30, 2008, Section 4.1(a)(i)a.1. is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
|
1. |
|
his Qualified Benefit (using the Formula Amount under
Supplement B of the Associate Plan) and |
2
12. Effective as of the opening of business on January 1, 2011, Section 4.1(c) is hereby added
to the Plan to read in its entirety as follows:
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Benefit shall accrue under the Plan for any
Participant after December 31, 2010.
13. Effective as of the opening of business on January 1, 2011, the following new paragraph is
hereby added to the end of Appendix A to the Plan to read in its entirety as follows:
No Employee shall participate in the Plan or accrue a Benefit under the Plan after
December 31, 2010.
*************************
Executed at Pasadena, California, this 16th day of December, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Dean A. Scarborough
Dean A. Scarborough
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
3
exv12
Exhibit 12
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
$ |
351.3 |
|
|
$ |
(790.9 |
) |
|
$ |
270.6 |
|
Add: Fixed charges (1) |
|
|
115.2 |
|
|
|
124.5 |
|
|
|
158.9 |
|
Amortization of capitalized interest |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Less: Capitalized interest |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
466.0 |
|
|
$ |
(667.3 |
) |
|
$ |
426.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed charges: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
76.6 |
|
|
$ |
85.3 |
|
|
$ |
115.9 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Interest portion of leases |
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
115.2 |
|
|
$ |
124.5 |
|
|
$ |
158.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (2) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing earnings by fixed
charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of income before taxes plus fixed charges and
amortization of capitalized interest, less capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of
interest expense, capitalized interest and the portion of rent expense (estimated to be 35%)
on operating leases deemed representative of interest. |
|
(2) |
|
For the year ended January 2, 2010, the Companys earnings were not sufficient to
cover fixed charges by $791.8. The loss primarily reflected the non-cash goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $832 and loss on extinguishment of
debt of approximately $21 recorded in the first quarter of 2009, and legal settlements of $41
recorded in 2009. |
exv13
2010 Annual Report Businesses at a Glance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials |
|
Retail Information Services |
|
Office and Consumer Products |
|
Other specialty converting businesses |
|
BUSINESSES
|
|
Roll Materials
Graphics and
Reflective Products
|
|
Information and Brand Management
Printer Systems
Fastener
|
|
Office Products
|
|
Specialty Tape
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
Industrial and Automotive Products
Performance Films
Business Media
Security Printing
Medical Products |
|
SALES (in millions)
|
|
$3,640
|
|
$1,522
|
|
$815
|
|
$536 |
|
PERCENT OF TOTAL SALES
|
|
56%
|
|
23%
|
|
13%
|
|
8% |
|
GLOBAL BRANDS
|
|
Fasson®, Avery Graphics, Avery Dennison®
|
|
Avery Dennison®, Monarch®
|
|
Avery®
|
|
Avery Dennison® |
|
PRODUCTS
|
|
Pressure-sensitive roll materials, flexible
packaging, roll-fed sleeve, water- and solvent-based
performance polymer adhesives and engineered films,
graphic imaging media, reflective materials
|
|
Graphic tags and labels, variable data
tags and labels, woven and printed
fabric labels, patches and specialty
trim, packaging, radio frequency
identification (RFID) tags, designer
trim collections, printer systems,
solution-enabling products such as
fastening and application devices
|
|
Self-adhesive labels, binders, sheet
protectors, dividers, online
templates and printing, writing
instruments, T-shirt transfers,
do-it-yourself card products
|
|
Specialty tapes, skin-contact
medical adhesives, surgical, wound
care and ostomy products, industrial
adhesives, automotive paint
protection and exterior films, heat
seal, security and information
labels, functional packaging labels,
architectural and engineered films,
point-of-purchase and display tags,
metallized pigments, self-adhesive
postage stamps, RFID inlays and
durable tags |
|
MARKET SEGMENTS
|
|
Food, beverage, spirits, household products,
pharmaceuticals, health and beauty, durables, fleet,
vehicle/automotive, architectural/retail,
promotional/advertising, traffic, safety, transportation
original equipment manufacturing
|
|
Retail apparel, manufacturing apparel,
mass market retailers, retail hard
goods and supply chains, food service
and supply chains, logistics,
pharmaceuticals, automotive
|
|
Professional, personal and on-the-go
organization and identification,
education
|
|
Automotive, consumer, medical and
healthcare, retail apparel,
electronics, durable goods,
architectural, graphic arts, general
industrial, building and
construction, logistics, retail
point-of-purchase, security printing |
|
CUSTOMERS
|
|
Global label converters, consumer product brands,
package designers, packaging engineers and
manufacturers, industrial manufacturers, printers,
distributors, designers, advertising agencies,
government agencies, sign manufacturers, graphic vendors
|
|
Apparel brands and retailers, apparel
manufacturers, consumer goods
manufacturers, restaurant and food
service chains, grocery and drug store
chains, automotive manufacturers
|
|
Office products superstores, major
retailers, distributors, wholesalers,
office professionals, school
administrators, small business
owners, consumers
|
|
Industrial and original equipment
manufacturers, medical products and
device manufacturers, clinicians and
nurses, converters, packagers,
consumer products companies |
|
SAFE HARBOR
STATEMENT
The matters discussed in this Annual Report contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements, which are not statements of historical fact, may
contain estimates, assumptions, projections
and/or
expectations regarding future events, which may or may not
occur. Words such as aim, anticipate,
assume, believe, continue,
could, estimate, expect,
guidance, intend, may,
might, objective, plan,
potential, project, seek,
shall, should, target,
will, would, or variations thereof and
other expressions, which refer to future events and trends,
identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements, and financial or other business targets, are subject
to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual
results to differ materially from expected results, performance
or achievements of the Company expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements.
Certain risks and uncertainties are discussed in more detail in
Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011, and include, but are
not limited to, risks and uncertainties relating to: investment
in development activities and new production facilities;
fluctuations in cost and availability of raw materials; ability
of the Company to achieve and sustain targeted cost reductions;
ability of the Company to generate sustained productivity
improvement; successful integration of acquisitions; successful
implementation of new manufacturing technologies and
installation of manufacturing equipment; disruptions in
information technology systems; successful installation of new
or upgraded information technology systems; the financial
condition and inventory strategies of customers; customer and
supplier concentrations; changes in customer order patterns;
loss of significant contract(s) or customer(s); timely
development and market acceptance of new products; fluctuations
in demand affecting sales to customers; collection of
receivables from customers; impact of competitive products and
pricing; selling prices; business mix shift; volatility of
capital and credit markets; impairment of capitalized assets,
including goodwill and other intangibles; credit risks; ability
of the Company to obtain adequate financing arrangements and to
maintain access to capital; fluctuations in interest and tax
rates; fluctuations in pension, insurance and employee benefit
costs; impact of legal proceedings; changes in tax laws and
regulations; changes in governmental regulations; changes in
political conditions; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates and other risks associated with foreign operations;
worldwide and local economic conditions; impact of
epidemiological events on the economy and the Companys
customers, suppliers and employees; acts of war, terrorism, and
natural disasters; and other factors.
The Company believes that the most significant risk factors that
could affect its financial performance in the near-term include:
(1) the degree to which higher costs can be offset with
productivity measures
and/or
passed on to customers through selling price increases, without
a significant loss of volume; (2) the impact of
competitors actions, including pricing, expansion in key
market segments, and product offerings; (3) the impact of
economic conditions on underlying demand for the Companys
products; and (4) the impact of changes in tax laws and
regulations throughout the world.
The Companys forward-looking statements represent judgment
only on the dates such statements were made. By making these
forward-looking statements, the Company assumes no duty to
update them to reflect new, changed or unanticipated events or
circumstances, other than as may be required by law.
12 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
Five-year
Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except %
|
|
5-Year Compound
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and per share amounts)
|
|
Growth Rate
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,512.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,952.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
6,710.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
6,307.8
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,575.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
1,826.0
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
1,586.5
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
1,727.0
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
1,722.4
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
1,538.0
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
1,370.4
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
1,268.8
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
1,304.3
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
1,182.5
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
1,011.1
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832.0
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
105.2
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other expense,
net(2)
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
.4
|
|
|
|
191.3
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
|
59.4
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
.6
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
|
(.9
|
)
|
|
|
351.3
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
(790.9
|
)
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
270.6
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
375.3
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
435.2
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
|
(44.2
|
)
|
|
|
(.7
|
)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
316.9
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
(746.7
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
266.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
303.5
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
358.5
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of
tax(3)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
316.9
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
(746.7
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
266.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
303.5
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
373.2
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share from continuing operations
|
|
|
.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share from continuing operations,
assuming dilution
|
|
|
.4
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
105.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution
(in millions)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
106.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share at fiscal year end
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
$
|
15.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price per share at fiscal year end
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
42.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price per share range
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.79 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.26 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.02 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.69 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.09 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At End of Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
120.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(134.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(127.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(419.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,262.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,493.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,591.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,099.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,002.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,035.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,244.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,324.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
956.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,088.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,145.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,337.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,624.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,209.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,255.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
968.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,645.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,362.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,989.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,696.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
expense(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
172.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
187.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
204.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
184.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
153.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
expense(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax
rate(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Results for 2009 reflected a
53-week period.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Included pretax charges for
restructuring costs, asset impairment charges, lease
cancellation costs, and other items.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Results for 2006 included a tax
benefit of $14.9 due to capital losses arising from the sale of
discontinued operations and a pretax gain on the sale of
discontinued operations of $1.3.
|
|
(4)
|
|
2006 amounts are related to
continuing operations.
|
13
Stockholder
Return Performance
The following graph compares the Companys cumulative
stockholder return on its common stock, including the
reinvestment of dividends, with the return on the
Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index (the
S&P 500 Index) and the average return, weighted
by market capitalization, of the peer group set forth below
(Peer Group) for the five-year period ending
December 31, 2010. The Company has also included the median
return of the Peer Group in the graph as an additional
comparison.
The Peer Group consists of 50 publicly-traded
U.S. companies selected on the basis of market diversity,
international focus and investment, market volatility, and
product line mix. The selection of the Peer Group was based on
the recommendation of Mercer, an independent executive
compensation consultant.
The Peer Group is comprised of Air Products &
Chemicals Inc., ArvinMeritor Inc., Baker-Hughes Incorporated,
Ball Corporation, Bemis Company, Inc., Briggs &
Stratton, Cabot Corporation, Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.,
Crane Company, Crown Holdings Inc., Cummins Inc., Dana Holding
Corporation, Danaher Corporation, Dover Corporation, Eaton
Corporation, Ecolab Incorporated, Ferro Corporation, FMC
Corporation, Fuller (H. B.) Company, Goodrich Corporation, Grace
(W R) & Company, Harley-Davidson Inc., Harris Corporation,
Harsco Corporation, Illinois Tool Works Incorporated,
Ingersoll-Rand Company, MASCO Corporation, MeadWestvaco
Corporation, NACCO Industries, Newell Rubbermaid Incorporated,
Olin Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., PACCAR Inc.,
Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Pentair Inc., Pitney Bowes
Incorporated, PolyOne Corporation, Potlatch Corporation, P.P.G.
Industries Incorporated, The Sherwin-Williams Company,
Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, Snap-On Incorporated,
Sonoco Products Company, Stanley Works, Tecumseh Products
Company, Temple-Inland Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.,
Thomas & Betts Corporation, Timken Company and Trinity
Industries.
Comparison of
Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
As of December 31, 2010
Total Return
Analysis(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
12/31/2009
|
|
|
12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
|
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
126.08
|
|
|
$
|
101.28
|
|
|
$
|
64.83
|
|
|
$
|
75.67
|
|
|
$
|
89.82
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
115.78
|
|
|
$
|
122.14
|
|
|
$
|
76.96
|
|
|
$
|
97.33
|
|
|
$
|
112.01
|
|
Peer Group (Weighted
Average)(2)
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
121.42
|
|
|
$
|
149.60
|
|
|
$
|
89.70
|
|
|
$
|
125.47
|
|
|
$
|
180.25
|
|
Peer Group (Median)
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
114.44
|
|
|
$
|
118.18
|
|
|
$
|
78.01
|
|
|
$
|
116.41
|
|
|
$
|
143.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Assumes $100 invested on
December 31, 2005, and the reinvestment of dividends; chart
reflects performance on a calendar year basis.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Weighted average is weighted by
market capitalization.
|
Stock price performance reflected in the above graph is not
necessarily indicative of future price performance.
14 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and
Financial Condition
ORGANIZATION OF
INFORMATION
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition narratively expresses our
view of our financial performance and condition and should be
read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements.
It includes the following sections:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
|
|
|
4
|
|
Forward-looking Statements
|
|
|
4
|
|
Overview and Outlook
|
|
|
4
|
|
Analysis of Results of Operations
|
|
|
6
|
|
Results of Operations by Segment
|
|
|
7
|
|
Financial Condition
|
|
|
9
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
|
|
|
13
|
|
Recent Accounting Requirements
|
|
|
17
|
|
Market-Sensitive Instruments and Risk Management
|
|
|
17
|
|
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL
MEASURES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, or GAAP. Our discussion of financial results
includes several non-GAAP financial measures to provide
additional information concerning our operating performance and
liquidity measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not in
accordance with, nor are they a substitute for, the comparable
GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are
intended to supplement our presentation of our financial results
that are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Based upon feedback
from our investors and financial analysis, we believe that
supplemental non-GAAP financial measures provide information
that is useful to the assessment of our performance and
operating trends, as well as liquidity.
Non-GAAP financial measures exclude the impact of certain
events, activities or strategic decisions. The accounting
effects of these events, activities or decisions, which are
included in the GAAP financial measures, may make it difficult
to assess our underlying performance in a single period. By
excluding certain accounting effects, both positive and
negative, from certain of our GAAP financial measures, we
believe that we are providing meaningful supplemental
information to facilitate an understanding of our core or
underlying operating results and liquidity measures. These
non-GAAP financial measures are used internally to evaluate
trends in our underlying business, as well as to facilitate
comparison to the results of competitors for a single period.
While some of the items we exclude from GAAP financial measures
recur, these items tend to be disparate in amount and timing.
We use the following non-GAAP financial measures:
|
|
|
|
o
|
Organic sales growth (decline) refers to the change in
sales excluding the estimated impact of currency translation,
acquisitions and divestitures and the extra week in fiscal year
2009.
|
|
o
|
Free cash flow refers to cash flow from operations, less
net payments for property, plant, equipment, software and other
deferred charges, plus net proceeds from sale (purchase) of
investments. Free cash flow excludes mandatory debt service
requirements and other uses of cash that do not directly or
immediately support the underlying business (such as
discretionary debt reductions, dividends, share repurchases,
acquisitions, etc.).
|
|
o
|
Operational working capital refers to trade accounts
receivable and inventories, net of accounts payable. This
non-GAAP financial measure excludes cash and cash equivalents,
short-term debt, deferred taxes, other current assets and other
current liabilities, as well as current assets and current
liabilities of held-for-sale businesses.
|
|
o
|
Net debt to EBITDA ratio refers to total debt less cash
and cash equivalents, divided by earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this discussion are
forward-looking statements and are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties. Refer to our Safe Harbor
Statement at the beginning of this report.
OVERVIEW AND
OUTLOOK
Overview
Fiscal
Year
Normally, each fiscal year consists of 52 weeks, but every fifth
or sixth year consists of 53 weeks. Our 2009 fiscal year
consisted of a 53-week period, with the extra week reflected in
the first quarter.
Sales
Our sales from operations increased 9% in 2010 compared to a
decline of 11% in 2009. The increase in 2010 resulted from
increased global demand, reflecting improvement from the weak
market conditions experienced in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated change in sales due to:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Organic sales growth (decline)
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Extra week in fiscal year
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Acquisitions, net of divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Reported sales growth
(decline)(1)
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Totals may not sum due to rounding.
|
Net Income
(Loss)
In 2010, we had net income of approximately $317 million,
compared to a net loss of approximately $747 million in
2009.
Factors affecting changes in net income in 2010 compared to 2009
included:
Positive factors:
|
|
|
|
o
|
No impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible
assets, which impacted results in the prior year
|
|
o
|
Higher volume
|
|
o
|
Cost savings from productivity improvement initiatives,
including savings from restructuring actions
|
|
o
|
Lower restructuring, asset impairment, and lease cancellation
charges related to cost reduction actions
|
|
o
|
Lower net legal settlement costs
|
|
o
|
Lower loss on debt extinguishment
|
Negative factors:
|
|
|
|
o
|
Higher raw material costs
|
|
o
|
Higher tax expense
|
15
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
(continued)
|
|
|
|
o
|
Higher employee-related costs
|
|
o
|
Higher investments in growth and infrastructure
|
|
o
|
Impact of changes in customer programs in the Office and
Consumer Products segment
|
Cost Reduction
Actions
Q3
2010 Q4 2010 Actions
In the second half of 2010, we recorded approximately
$10 million in pretax charges, consisting of severance and
related costs for the reduction of approximately 725 positions,
asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation costs. We
anticipate approximately $12 million in annualized savings
from these restructuring actions to be realized by the end of
2012.
Q4
2008 Q2 2010 Program
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we initiated a restructuring
program that generated approximately $180 million in
annualized savings. We realized actual savings, net of
transition costs, of approximately $75 million in 2009 and
an incremental $72 million in 2010. We expect the remainder
of the savings to be realized in 2011.
We recorded approximately $150 million in pretax charges
(of which $105 million represents cash charges) related to
this restructuring program, consisting of severance and related
costs, asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation costs.
Of the total charges, approximately $12 million was
recorded in 2008, $129 million was recorded in 2009, and $9
million was recorded in 2010. Severance and related costs were
related to approximately 4,350 positions. We do not expect to
incur any further charges related to this program.
Q1
2008 Q3 2008 Actions
During the first three quarters of 2008, we implemented cost
reduction actions resulting in pretax charges of
$22.8 million, including severance and related costs for
approximately 775 positions, asset impairment charges, and lease
cancellation costs. We achieved annualized savings of
approximately $20 million (most of which benefited
2009) as a result of these actions.
Refer to Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions, to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Free Cash
Flow
We use free cash flow as a measure of funds available for other
corporate purposes, such as dividends, debt reduction,
acquisitions, and repurchases of common stock. We believe that
this measure provides meaningful supplemental information to our
investors to assist them in their financial analysis of the
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
486.7
|
|
|
$
|
569.0
|
|
|
$
|
539.7
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
(83.5
|
)
|
|
|
(69.7
|
)
|
|
|
(118.4
|
)
|
Purchase of software and other deferred charges
|
|
|
(25.1
|
)
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
(63.1
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale (purchase) of investments,
net(1)
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
378.9
|
|
|
$
|
468.2
|
|
|
$
|
375.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Net proceeds from sale (purchase)
of investments relate to net sales/purchases of securities held
by our captive insurance company in 2010, 2009 and 2008, and
sales of other investments in 2010 and 2008.
|
Free cash flow in 2010 reflected higher income from operations,
the amount and timing of payments for inventory purchases, and
improved accounts receivable collection efforts, as well as
lower spending on software and other deferred charges. These
factors were more than offset by higher accounts receivable and
inventory levels due to the increase in sales, payments of
severance and other costs related to various restructuring
programs, bonuses and trade rebates, as well as higher net
spending on property, plant, and equipment.
Free cash flow in 2009 reflected improved inventory management
and collection of trade accounts receivables, as well as lower
spending on property, plant and equipment, software and other
deferred charges, partially offset by lower income from
operations.
See Analysis of Results of Operations and
Liquidity below for more information.
Outlook
Certain factors that we believe may contribute to results for
2011 compared to results for 2010 are listed below.
We expect revenue and earnings to increase in 2011, the extent
to which is subject, but not limited, to the amount of higher
costs, principally due to expected raw materials inflation, that
can be offset with productivity measures
and/or price
increases and changes in global economic conditions.
We expect a reduction in ongoing retirement plan expenses and
contributions to our pension plans (domestic and international)
of approximately $50 million in 2011.
We anticipate restructuring cash charges to be approximately
$20 million.
We anticipate 2011 interest expense to be comparable to 2010.
Our assumptions on interest expense are subject to changes in
market rates through the remainder of the year.
Our annual effective tax rate may be impacted by future events
including changes in tax laws, geographic income mix,
repatriation of cash, tax audits, closure of tax years, legal
entity restructuring, and changes in valuation allowances on
deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate can potentially have
wide variances from quarter to quarter, resulting from interim
reporting requirements and the recognition of discrete events.
We anticipate increased investments in marketing, research and
development, and infrastructure.
We anticipate our capital and software expenditures to be
approximately $175 million.
16 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
ANALYSIS OF
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Income (Loss)
Before Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,512.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,952.7
|
|
|
$
|
6,710.4
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
4,686.7
|
|
|
|
4,366.2
|
|
|
|
4,983.4
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,826.0
|
|
|
|
1,586.5
|
|
|
|
1,727.0
|
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
1,370.4
|
|
|
|
1,268.8
|
|
|
|
1,304.3
|
|
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
191.3
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
$
|
351.3
|
|
|
$
|
(790.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
270.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of Sales:
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
Sales
Sales increased 9% in 2010 and decreased 11% in 2009.
The increase in 2010 reflected higher sales on an organic basis
and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation
(approximately $27 million), partially offset by the
estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009.
On an organic basis, the sales growth in 2010 reflected higher
volume driven by increased demand across all major regions, led
by double-digit growth in the Pressure-sensitive Materials and
Retail Information Services segments.
The decrease in 2009 reflected lower sales on an organic basis,
partially offset by incremental sales from the DM Label Group
(DM Label) acquisition (approximately
$9 million) and the estimated impact of the extra week in
the first quarter of 2009. In addition, foreign currency
translation had an unfavorable impact on the change in sales of
approximately $269 million. On an organic basis, sales
declined 9% in 2009, as deterioration in market conditions
contributed to volume declines, partially offset by the effect
of changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact of
inflation experienced in 2008.
Gross Profit
Margin
Gross profit margin in 2010 improved compared to 2009,
reflecting increased volume and the benefits from restructuring
and productivity initiatives. These benefits were partially
offset by raw material inflation, higher employee costs, and the
impact of changes in customer programs in the Office and
Consumer Products segment.
Gross profit margin in 2009 improved compared to 2008, primarily
due to benefits from restructuring and productivity improvement
initiatives, the effect of changes in pricing to offset the
cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008, and lower
raw material and energy costs. These benefits were partially
offset by reduced fixed-cost leverage due to lower volume,
unfavorable segment mix, and higher employee costs.
Marketing,
General and Administrative Expense
The increase in marketing, general and administrative expense in
2010 compared to 2009 primarily reflected higher
employee-related costs, higher investments in growth and
infrastructure, and lower spending in 2009 due to adverse global
economic conditions. These increases were partially offset by
savings from restructuring and productivity initiatives.
Marketing, general and administrative expense in 2009 decreased
from 2008 as cost reductions consistent with a recessionary
environment, benefits from restructuring and productivity
initiatives, and the impact of foreign currency translation
(approximately $40 million) were partially offset by higher
employee costs, investment in growth initiatives, and the
estimated impact of the extra week in 2009.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense decreased 10%, or approximately
$9 million, in 2010, and 26%, or approximately
$31 million, in 2009, due to retirements and repayments of
certain indebtedness and lower interest rates on short-term
borrowings.
Other Expense,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, pretax)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
$
|
86.8
|
|
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
Asset impairment and lease cancellation charges
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
$
|
27.7
|
|
|
$
|
191.3
|
|
|
$
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
For all three years presented, Other expense, net
consisted of charges for restructuring, including severance and
related costs, asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation
costs, as described above in Cost Reduction Actions.
Refer also to Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions,
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
In 2010, other items in Other expense, net included:
|
|
|
|
o
|
Loss from curtailment and settlement of pension obligations
($4.3 million)
|
|
o
|
Loss from debt extinguishment ($4 million)
|
|
o
|
Net legal settlement costs ($.9 million)
|
|
o
|
Gain on sale of investment ($.5 million)
|
In 2009, other items in Other expense, net included:
|
|
|
|
o
|
Legal settlement costs ($41 million)
|
|
o
|
Loss from debt extinguishment ($21.2 million)
|
For more information regarding the debt extinguishment, refer to
Financial Condition below, and Note 4,
Debt, to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For
more information regarding the legal settlement costs, refer to
Note 8, Contingencies, to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In 2008, other items included in Other expense, net
consisted of a gain on sale of investments ($4.5 million).
17
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
(continued)
Net Income (Loss)
and Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
$
|
351.3
|
|
|
$
|
(790.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
270.6
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
(44.2
|
)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
316.9
|
|
|
$
|
(746.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
266.1
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution
|
|
$
|
2.97
|
|
|
$
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as a percent of sales
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
Provision for
(Benefit from) Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was approximately 10% for 2010 compared
to approximately 6% for 2009. The 2010 effective tax rate
reflected $45.5 million of benefit from net operating
losses resulting from the local statutory write down of certain
investments in Europe and a $17.7 million net benefit from
releases and accruals of certain tax reserves.
The effective tax rate was approximately 6% for 2009 compared to
approximately 2% for 2008. The 2009 effective tax rate was most
significantly influenced by the non-cash goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges, as these
expenses were largely not tax deductible, and from one-time
benefits from tax planning actions, partially offset by
increases to our tax reserves.
Refer to Note 11, Taxes on Income, to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT
Operating income (loss) refers to income (loss) before
interest and taxes.
Pressure-sensitive
Materials Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales
|
|
$
|
3,796.8
|
|
|
$
|
3,447.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,816.3
|
|
Less intersegment sales
|
|
|
(157.0
|
)
|
|
|
(147.1
|
)
|
|
|
(172.5
|
)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,639.8
|
|
|
$
|
3,300.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,643.8
|
|
Operating
income(1)
|
|
|
317.8
|
|
|
|
184.7
|
|
|
|
257.2
|
|
|
|
(1) Included restructuring
costs and asset impairment charges for all years presented, loss
from curtailment of domestic pension obligations in 2010, and
lease cancellation costs in 2009 and 2008
|
|
$
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
75.3
|
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales
Sales in our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment increased 10%
in 2010 and decreased 9% in 2009.
In 2010, the increase reflected sales growth on an organic basis
and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation
(approximately $17 million), partially offset by the
estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009.
On an organic basis, sales grew 11% in 2010, reflecting higher
volume driven by increased demand.
On an organic basis, sales in our roll materials business in
2010 increased at a low-double digit rate compared to 2009,
reflecting growth in all of our geographic regions.
On an organic basis, sales in our graphics and reflective
business increased at a high-single digit rate, reflecting
increased promotional spending by customers and our new product
launches.
In 2009, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on
an organic basis and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency
translation (approximately $186 million), partially offset
by the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter
of 2009. On an organic basis, sales declined 6% in 2009
primarily due to declines in volume, partially offset by the
effect of changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact of
inflation experienced in 2008.
On an organic basis, sales in our roll materials business in
2009 declined at a high single-digit rate in Europe, a mid
single-digit rate (excluding intercompany sales) in North
America, and a low single-digit rate in Latin America,
reflecting weakness in end markets. These declines were
partially offset by mid-single digit growth in Asia. On an
organic basis, sales in our emerging markets (Asia, Latin
America, and Eastern Europe) remained flat in 2009 compared to
2008.
On an organic basis, sales in our graphics and reflective
business in 2009 declined at a mid-teen rate, reflecting lower
promotional spending by businesses in response to weak market
conditions.
Operating
Income
Increased operating income in 2010 reflected higher volume,
lower net legal settlement costs, cost savings from
restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives, the
benefits from pricing, and lower restructuring and asset
impairment charges, partially offset by raw material inflation,
higher employee-related costs, and higher investments in growth
and infrastructure.
Decreased operating income in 2009 reflected lower volume, legal
settlement costs, the unfavorable impact of currency
translation, higher restructuring, asset impairment, and lease
cancellation charges, and higher employee costs. These factors
were partially offset by the effect of changes in pricing to
offset the cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008,
cost savings from restructuring and productivity improvement
initiatives, and lower raw material and energy costs.
Retail
Information Services Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales
|
|
$
|
1,523.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,322.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,549.3
|
|
Less intersegment sales
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,521.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,320.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,547.2
|
|
Operating income
(loss)(1)(2)
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
(899.0
|
)
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
(1) Included restructuring
costs, asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation costs in
all years presented, and loss from curtailment of domestic
pension obligations and net legal settlement costs in 2010
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
51.6
|
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
(2) Included goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges in 2009 and
transition costs associated with acquisition integrations in 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
832.0
|
|
|
$
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales
Sales in our Retail Information Services segment increased 15%
in 2010 and decreased 15% in 2009.
In 2010, sales on reported and organic bases increased 15%
compared to 2009, as the favorable impact of foreign currency
translation
18 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
(approximately $7 million) was offset by the estimated
impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009. The sales
growth reflected increased demand due in part to significant
inventory reductions by apparel retailers during 2009, as well
as new programs with key brands and retailers.
In 2009, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on
an organic basis and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency
translation (approximately $46 million), partially offset
by the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter
of 2009 and incremental sales from the DM Label acquisition
(approximately $9 million). On an organic basis, sales
declined 14% in 2009 due primarily to lower volume from weakness
in the apparel markets in the U.S. and Europe, and tighter
inventory controls by retailers and brands.
Operating Income
(Loss)
Increased operating income in 2010 primarily reflected the
absence of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset
impairment charges recorded in the prior year. Operating income
also increased due to the benefits of higher volume, cost
savings from restructuring and productivity improvement
initiatives, and lower restructuring, asset impairment charges
and lease cancellation costs, partially offset by higher
employee-related costs.
Operating loss in 2009 reflected goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible asset impairment charges, lower volume, higher
restructuring, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges,
changes in pricing, and higher employee costs. These factors
were partially offset by incremental savings from integration
actions and the benefit of restructuring and productivity
improvement initiatives, along with reduced transition costs
associated with acquisition integrations in 2009.
Office and
Consumer Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales
|
|
$
|
816.0
|
|
|
$
|
850.0
|
|
|
$
|
937.0
|
|
Less intersegment sales
|
|
|
(.8
|
)
|
|
|
(.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
815.2
|
|
|
$
|
849.3
|
|
|
$
|
935.8
|
|
Operating
income(1)
|
|
|
91.5
|
|
|
|
118.1
|
|
|
|
145.7
|
|
|
|
(1) Included restructuring
costs in all years presented, asset impairment charges in 2009
and 2008, and loss from curtailment and settlement of pension
obligations and lease cancellation costs in 2010
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
$
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales
Sales in our Office and Consumer Products segment decreased 4%
in 2010 and 9% in 2009.
Sales in our Office and Consumer Products segment on a reported
and organic basis decreased 4% in 2010 compared to 2009, as the
estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009
offset the favorable impact of foreign currency translation
(approximately $5 million). On an organic basis, the sales
decline in 2010 reflected continued weak end-market demand,
increased competition in the label category, and changes in
customer programs.
In 2009, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on
an organic basis and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency
translation (approximately $22 million), partially offset
by the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter
of 2009. On an organic basis, sales declined 8% in 2009 due
primarily to lower volume from weak end market demand led by
slower corporate purchasing activity, partially offset by strong
back-to-school
sales and the effect of changes in pricing to offset the
cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008.
Operating
Income
Decreased operating income in 2010 reflected higher investment
in demand creation, innovation, and consumer promotions and
marketing, changes in customer programs, and raw material
inflation, partially offset by benefits from restructuring and
productivity improvement initiatives and lower restructuring and
asset impairment charges.
Decreased operating income in 2009 reflected the impact of lower
volume, higher employee costs, and increased marketing and
product development spending, partially offset by cost savings
from restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives and
the effect of changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact
of inflation experienced in 2008.
Other specialty
converting businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales
|
|
$
|
566.7
|
|
|
$
|
498.3
|
|
|
$
|
609.9
|
|
Less intersegment sales
|
|
|
(30.7
|
)
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
|
(26.3
|
)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
536.0
|
|
|
$
|
482.5
|
|
|
$
|
583.6
|
|
Operating income
(loss)(1)
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
(44.1
|
)
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
(1) Included restructuring
costs and asset impairment charges for all years presented and
loss from curtailment of domestic pension obligations in 2010
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
29.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales
Sales in our other specialty converting businesses increased 11%
in 2010 and decreased 18% in 2009.
Sales in our other specialty converting businesses increased 11%
in 2010 compared to 2009, due primarily to the increase in sales
on an organic basis, partially offset by the unfavorable impact
of foreign currency translation (approximately $2 million)
and the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter
of 2009. On an organic basis, sales grew 12% in 2010, reflecting
increased demand for products for automotive applications, which
was down sharply in 2009.
In 2009, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on
an organic basis and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency
translation (approximately $15 million), partially offset
by the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter
of 2009. On an organic basis, sales declined 16% in 2009,
primarily reflecting lower volume in products sold to the
automotive, housing, and construction industries.
Operating Income
(Loss)
Operating income for these businesses in 2010 reflected lower
restructuring and asset impairment charges, higher volume, and
the benefits from restructuring and productivity improvement
initiatives, partially offset by raw material inflation and
higher employee-related costs.
Operating loss for these businesses in 2009 reflected lower
volume and higher restructuring and asset impairment charges,
partially offset by the benefit of restructuring and
productivity improvement initiatives.
19
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
(continued)
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Liquidity
Cash Flow from
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
316.9
|
|
|
$
|
(746.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
266.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
247.6
|
|
|
|
267.3
|
|
|
|
278.4
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment and net loss on sale and disposal of assets
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Loss from debt extinguishments
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
Other non-cash expense and loss
|
|
|
43.6
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Other non-cash income and gain
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
(87.6
|
)
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(35.6
|
)
|
|
|
133.3
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(39.8
|
)
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
(30.0
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
76.5
|
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
(37.9
|
)
|
|
|
(19.2
|
)
|
Income taxes (deferred and accrued)
|
|
|
(60.2
|
)
|
|
|
(90.7
|
)
|
|
|
(79.9
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
Long-term retirement benefits and other liabilities
|
|
|
(52.6
|
)
|
|
|
(40.0
|
)
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
486.7
|
|
|
$
|
569.0
|
|
|
$
|
539.7
|
|
|
|
For cash flow purposes, changes in assets and liabilities and
other adjustments, net of the effect of business acquisitions,
exclude the impact of foreign currency translation (discussed
below in Analysis of Selected Balance Sheet
Accounts).
In 2010, cash flow provided by operating activities reflected
higher income from operations, the amount and timing of payments
for inventory purchases, and improved accounts receivable
collection efforts. These factors were more than offset by
higher accounts receivable and inventory levels due to the
increase in sales, and payments of severance and other costs
related to various restructuring programs, bonuses and trade
rebates.
In 2009, cash flow provided by operating activities reflected
improved inventory management and collection of trade accounts
receivable, partially offset by lower income from operations.
Cash Flow from
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
(83.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(118.4
|
)
|
Purchase of software and other deferred charges
|
|
|
(25.1
|
)
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
(63.1
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131.2
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale (purchase) of investments, net
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(107.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(105.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(293.5
|
)
|
|
|
Capital and
Software Spending
In 2010 and 2009, we invested in various capital projects
companywide.
Information technology investments in 2010 and 2009 included
customer service and standardization initiatives.
Payments for
acquisitions
On April 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of DM Label.
Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions, to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Proceeds from
Sale (Purchase) of Investments, net
In 2008, net proceeds from sale (purchase) of investments
consisted of the sale of securities primarily held by our
captive insurance company.
Cash Flow from
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in borrowings and
payments of debt
|
|
$
|
(189.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(300.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40.7
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(88.7
|
)
|
|
|
(134.9
|
)
|
|
|
(175.0
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(108.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
$
|
(391.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(432.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(208.5
|
)
|
|
|
Borrowings and
Repayment of Debt
Short-term variable rate domestic borrowings from commercial
paper issuances were approximately $298 million at year end
2010 (weighted-average interest rate of .4%), compared to
approximately $415 million at year end 2009
(weighted-average interest rate of .2%).
At year end 2010, our borrowings outstanding under foreign
short-term lines of credit were approximately $82 million
(weighted-average interest rate of 10.6%), compared to
approximately $60 million at year end 2009
(weighted-average interest rate of 12.8%).
The decrease in outstanding commercial paper reflects positive
cash flow from improved operating income, partially offset by
share repurchases during the fourth quarter of 2010. Refer to
Share Repurchases below for more information.
We had medium-term notes of $50 million outstanding at both
year end 2010 and 2009.
In March 2009, we completed an exchange of approximately
6.6 million units (or 75.15%) of our HiMEDS units. We
issued approximately 6.5 million shares of our common stock
and paid approximately $43 million in cash for the
exchanged HiMEDS units with a carrying value of approximately
$331 million. As a result of this exchange, we recorded a
debt extinguishment loss of approximately $21 million (included
in Other expense, net in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations) in the first quarter of 2009, which included a
write-off of $9.6 million related to unamortized debt
issuance costs. In November 2010, we completed the remarketing
of our remaining HiMEDS senior notes in accordance with the
original terms of the HiMEDS units by purchasing approximately
$109 million of these senior notes. In aggregate, this
remarketing resulted in the extinguishment of approximately
$109 million of senior notes and the issuance of
approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock. As a
result of this remarketing, we recorded a debt extinguishment
loss of $2.8 million (included in Other expense,
net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations),
which consisted of a write-off related to unamortized debt
issuance costs.
20 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
In January 2009, one of our subsidiaries entered into an
amendment to a credit agreement for a $400 million term
loan credit facility (Credit Facility) with certain
domestic and foreign banks, which we guaranteed. Financing
available under the Credit Facility was permitted to be used for
working capital and other general corporate purposes. The
amendment increased our flexibility for a specified period of
time in complying with the financial covenants to which the
Credit Facility is subject and excluded certain restructuring
charges from the calculation of the financial ratios under those
covenants. The amendment also increased the annual interest rate
of the Credit Facility. In April 2010, we issued $250 million of
senior notes bearing an interest rate of 5.375% per year, due
April 2020. Approximately $248 million in proceeds from the
offering, net of underwriting discounts and offering expenses,
were used, together with commercial paper borrowings, to repay
the $325 million in indebtedness outstanding under the
Credit Facility in May 2010. In the second quarter of 2010, we
recorded a debt extinguishment loss of $1.2 million related
to unamortized debt issuance costs from the Credit Facility.
Refer to Note 4, Debt, to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for more information.
Refer to Capital Resources below for further
information on the 2010 and 2009 borrowings and repayment of
debt.
Dividend
Payments
In July 2009, we reduced our quarterly dividend per share of
$.41 to $.20, resulting in an annual dividend per share of $.80
in 2010 compared to $1.22 in 2009.
Subsequent to the end of 2010, on February 2, 2011, we
announced a first quarter 2011 dividend of $.25 per share, which
represents a 25% increase from our previous dividend of $.20 per
share.
Share
Repurchases
The Board of Directors authorizes share repurchases of our
outstanding common stock. Repurchased shares may be reissued
under our stock option and incentive plans or used for other
corporate purposes. We repurchased approximately
2.7 million shares totaling $108.7 million during the
fourth quarter of 2010 to offset the impact of dilution on
earnings per share associated with the issuance of approximately
2.1 million shares of our common stock as a result of the
remarketing of our remaining HiMEDS senior notes in November
2010. Additionally, in December 2010, we executed the repurchase
of approximately .3 million shares for $13.5 million which
settled in January 2011. As of January 1, 2011,
approximately 1.2 million shares were available for
repurchase under the Board of Directors October 2006
authorization.
Subsequent to the end of 2010, on January 27, 2011, the
Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase an additional
five million shares of our stock.
Analysis of
Selected Balance Sheet Accounts
Long-lived
Assets
Goodwill decreased approximately $10 million during 2010,
which primarily reflected the impact of foreign currency
translation.
Other intangibles resulting from business acquisitions, net,
decreased approximately $33 million during 2010, which
primarily reflected current year amortization expense.
Refer to Note 3, Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Resulting from Business Acquisitions, to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for more information.
Other assets decreased approximately $16 million during
2010, which reflected amortization expense of software and other
deferred charges ($38 million), a decrease in long-term
pension assets ($6 million), a reclassification of a
third-party loan receivable to short-term receivables
($5 million), the write-off of unamortized debt issuance
costs associated with the remarketing of the HiMEDS units, net
of additional financing costs, related to the issuance of senior
notes discussed in Borrowings and Repayment of Debt
($2 million), and the impact of foreign currency
translation ($2 million). These decreases were partially
offset by purchases of software and other deferred charges
($25 million) and an increase in the cash surrender value
of our corporate-owned life insurance ($12 million).
Shareholders
Equity Accounts
Our shareholders equity was $1.65 billion at year end
2010, compared to $1.36 billion at year end 2009. The
increase in our shareholders equity was primarily due to
higher net income, a decrease in dividend payments and
recognition of current year stock-based compensation expense.
The value of our Employee Stock Benefit Trust (ESBT)
decreased approximately $170 million in 2010 due primarily
to the release of approximately 4.3 million common shares
from the ESBT, resulting from the settlement of our employee
benefit obligations ($163 million). These shares were
included as Treasury stock at cost in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The decrease was also attributable
to the issuance of shares under our incentive plans and our
defined contribution plan ($22 million), partially offset
by an increase in the market value of shares held in the trust
($15 million).
Accumulated other comprehensive loss decreased by approximately
$2 million during 2010 due primarily to the impact of
foreign currency translation ($18 million) and lower net
loss on derivative instruments designated as cash flow and firm
commitment hedges ($2 million). These decreases were
partially offset by the current year amortization of net pension
transition obligations, prior service cost, and net actuarial
losses in our pension and other postretirement plans
($18 million). Refer to Note 6, Pension and
Other Postretirement Benefits, to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for more information.
Impact of Foreign
Currency Translation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net sales
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(269
|
)
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
Change in net income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
In 2010, international operations generated approximately 68% of
our net sales. Our future results are subject to changes in
political and economic conditions in the regions in which we
operate and the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange and interest rates.
The effect of currency translation on sales in 2010 primarily
reflected a positive impact from sales in the currencies of
Australia, Brazil, Canada and South Korea, partially offset by a
negative impact from sales denominated in euros.
Translation gains and losses for operations in hyperinflationary
economies, if any, are included in net income in the period
incurred. Operations are treated as being in a hyperinflationary
economy based on the
21
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
(continued)
cumulative inflation rate over the past three years. In 2010,
2009 and 2008, we had no operations in hyperinflationary
economies.
Effect of Foreign
Currency Transactions
The impact on net income from transactions denominated in
foreign currencies may be mitigated because the costs of our
products are generally denominated in the same currencies in
which they are sold. In addition, to reduce our income and cash
flow exposure to transactions in foreign currencies, we may
enter into foreign exchange forward, option and swap contracts,
where available and appropriate.
Analysis of
Selected Financial Ratios
We utilize certain financial ratios to assess our financial
condition and operating performance, as discussed below.
Operational
Working Capital Ratio
Working capital (deficit) (current assets minus current
liabilities) as a percent of net sales increased in 2010 due to
a decrease in short-term and the current portion of long-term
debt, as well as an increase in net accounts receivable, net
inventory, and current deferred tax assets, partially offset by
an increase in accounts payable.
Operational working capital, as a percent of net sales, is a
non-GAAP financial measure and is reconciled with working
capital below. We use this non-GAAP financial measure as a tool
to assess our working capital requirements because it excludes
the impact of fluctuations attributable to our financing and
other activities (that affect cash and cash equivalents,
deferred taxes, other current assets, and other current
liabilities) that tend to be disparate in amount and timing, and
therefore, may increase the volatility of the working capital
ratio from period to period. Additionally, the items excluded
from this measure are not necessarily indicative of the
underlying trends of our operations and are not significantly
influenced by the
day-to-day
activities that are managed at the operating level. Refer to
Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Our objective is
to minimize our investment in operational working capital, as a
percentage of sales, by reducing this ratio to maximize cash
flow and return on investment.
Operational
Working Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(A) Working capital (deficit) (current assets minus current
liabilities)
|
|
$
|
120.1
|
|
|
$
|
(134.5
|
)
|
Reconciling items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(127.5
|
)
|
|
|
(138.1
|
)
|
Current deferred and refundable income taxes and other current
assets
|
|
|
(308.4
|
)
|
|
|
(199.2
|
)
|
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
381.0
|
|
|
|
535.6
|
|
Current deferred and payable income taxes and other current
accrued liabilities
|
|
|
702.6
|
|
|
|
642.3
|
|
|
|
(B) Operational working capital
|
|
$
|
767.8
|
|
|
$
|
706.1
|
|
|
|
(C) Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,512.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,850.8
|
(1)
|
|
|
Working capital (deficit), as a percent of
net sales (A)
¸
(C)
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
Operational working capital, as a percent
of net sales (B)
¸
(C)
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Adjusted for the estimated impact
of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009
|
As a percent of net sales, operational working capital in 2010
decreased compared to 2009. The primary factors contributing to
this change, which includes the impact of foreign currency
translation, are discussed below.
Accounts
Receivable Ratio
The average number of days sales outstanding was 57 days in
2010 compared to 59 days in 2009, calculated using a
four-quarter average accounts receivable balance divided by the
average daily sales for the year. The change from prior year in
the average number of days sales outstanding primarily reflected
improvement in collection efforts.
Inventory
Ratio
Average inventory turnover was 8.6 in 2010 compared to 8.4 in
2009, calculated using the annual cost of sales divided by a
four-quarter average inventory balance. The change from prior
year in the average inventory turnover reflected a continued
focus on improvements in inventory management.
Accounts Payable
Ratio
The average number of days payable outstanding was 58 days
in 2010 compared to 53 days in 2009, calculated using a
four-quarter average accounts payable balance divided by the
average daily cost of products sold for the year. The change
from prior year in the average number of days payable
outstanding was primarily due to the amount and timing of
inventory purchases and timing of payments to vendors.
Net Debt to
EBITDA Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
316.9
|
|
|
$
|
(746.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
266.1
|
|
Reconciling items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
(44.2
|
)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
172.9
|
|
|
|
187.6
|
|
|
|
204.6
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
79.7
|
|
|
|
73.8
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
675.5
|
|
|
$
|
(438.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
664.9
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
1,337.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,624.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,209.8
|
|
Less cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(127.5
|
)
|
|
|
(138.1
|
)
|
|
|
(105.5
|
)
|
|
|
Net debt
|
|
$
|
1,209.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,486.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,104.3
|
|
|
|
Net debt to EBITDA ratio
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
(1)
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The net debt to EBITDA ratio was
not meaningful for 2009 as EBITDA was negative. EBITDA in 2009
included $832 in charges related to the impairment of goodwill
and indefinite-lived intangibles.
|
We believe that the net debt to EBITDA ratio is a meaningful
measurement because investors view it as an indicator of our
leverage position.
In 2010, the net debt to EBITDA ratio improved compared to 2009
primarily due to the impact of goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible asset impairment charges recorded in the prior year,
repayment of debt, and an increase in operating income.
Financial
Covenants
Our various loan agreements in effect at year end require that
we maintain specified financial covenant ratios on total debt
and interest expense in
22 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
relation to certain measures of income. As of January 1,
2011, we were in compliance with these financial covenants. In
January 2009, we amended the covenants included in the revolving
credit agreement and term loan agreement to exclude certain
restructuring charges and adjust covenant levels. The adjusted
covenant levels changed quarterly and reverted back to the
pre-amendment
levels during 2010. The amendments also resulted in increased
pricing levels for borrowings under both agreements through the
end of their respective terms. Refer to Note 4,
Debt, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further information.
The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated primarily
based on the credit spread above U.S. Treasury securities on
notes with similar rates, credit rating, and remaining
maturities. At year end, the fair value of our total debt,
including short-term borrowings, was $1.39 billion in 2010
and $1.60 billion in 2009. Fair value amounts were
determined primarily based on Level 2 inputs, defined as
inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are
either directly or indirectly observable. Refer to Note 1,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Capital
Resources
Capital resources include cash flows from operations, cash and
cash equivalents and debt financing. At year end 2010, we had
cash and cash equivalents of approximately $128 million
held in accounts at third-party financial institutions.
Our $1 billion revolving credit facility, which supports
our commercial paper programs in the U.S. and Europe,
matures in 2012. Based upon our current outlook for our business
and market conditions, we believe that this facility, in
addition to the uncommitted bank lines of credit maintained in
the countries in which we operate, will provide the liquidity to
fund our operations during 2011.
We are exposed to financial market risk resulting from changes
in interest and foreign currency rates, and to possible
liquidity and credit risks of our counterparties.
Capital from
Debt
Our total debt decreased by approximately $287 million in
2010 to $1.34 billion compared to $1.62 billion at
year end 2009, reflecting a decrease in long-term borrowings, as
well as a decrease in commercial paper borrowings. Refer to
Borrowings and Repayment of Debt above for more
information.
We have $1.2 million of debt maturities due in 2011.
We had standby letters of credit outstanding of
$41.1 million and $52.5 million at the end of 2010 and
2009, respectively. The aggregate contract amount of outstanding
standby letters of credit approximated fair value.
Our uncommitted lines of credit were approximately
$407 million at year end 2010 and may be cancelled by the
banks or us at any time.
Credit ratings are a significant factor in our ability to raise
short-term and long-term financing. The credit ratings assigned
to us also impact the interest rates paid and our access to
commercial paper, credit facilities, and other borrowings. A
downgrade of our short-term credit ratings below our current
levels would impact our ability to access the commercial paper
markets. If our access to commercial paper markets is limited,
our revolving credit facility and other credit facilities are
available to meet our short-term funding requirements, if
necessary. When determining a credit rating, the rating agencies
place significant weight on our competitive position, business
outlook, consistency of cash flows, debt level and liquidity,
geographic dispersion and management team. We remain committed
to retaining an investment grade rating.
Contractual
Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
Contractual
Obligations at End of Year 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term lines of credit
|
|
$
|
379.8
|
|
|
$
|
379.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
949.2
|
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
694.1
|
|
Long-term capital leases
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
.6
|
|
|
|
.6
|
|
Interest on long-term
debt(1)
|
|
|
503.2
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
266.3
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
244.2
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefit payments (unfunded plans)
|
|
|
56.7
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
2,141.3
|
|
|
$
|
506.2
|
|
|
$
|
113.4
|
|
|
$
|
335.5
|
|
|
$
|
71.1
|
|
|
$
|
69.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,045.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Interest on floating rate debt was
estimated using the index rate in effect as of January 1,
2011.
|
We enter into operating leases primarily for office and
warehouse space and equipment for electronic data processing and
transportation. The table above includes minimum annual rental
commitments on operating leases having initial or remaining
non-cancelable lease terms of one year or more. The terms of our
leases do not impose significant restrictions or unusual
obligations, except for the commercial facility located in
Mentor, Ohio, as noted below.
The table above does not include:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations or open purchase orders at year end. It is
impracticable for us to either obtain such information or
provide a reasonable estimate due to the decentralized nature of
our purchasing systems. In addition, purchase orders are
generally at fair value and are cancelable without penalty.
|
|
|
Cash funding requirements for pension benefits payable to
certain eligible current and future retirees under our funded
plans Benefits paid by our funded pension plans are
paid through a trust or trust equivalent. Cash funding
requirements for our funded plans, which can be significantly
impacted by earnings on investments, the discount rate, changes
in the plans, and funding laws and regulations, are not included
in this table as we are not able to estimate required
contributions to the trust or trust equivalent. Refer to Note 6,
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits, to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for expected contributions to
our plans.
|
23
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded termination indemnity benefits to certain employees
outside of the U.S. These benefits are subject to
applicable agreements, local laws and regulations. We have not
incurred significant costs related to performance under these
types of arrangements.
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefit reserves of approximately
$154 million, of which approximately $14 million may
become payable during 2011. The resolution of the balance,
including the timing of payments, is contingent upon various
unknown factors and cannot be reasonably estimated. Refer to
Note 11, Taxes Based on Income, to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on
unrecognized tax benefits.
|
|
|
Obligations associated with the headquarters and research center
for our roll materials division (the Facility),
located in Mentor, Ohio We completed the lease
financing for the Facility, which consists generally of land,
buildings, equipment and office furnishings, on September 9,
2005. We have leased the Facility under an operating lease
arrangement, which contains a residual value guarantee of $33.4
million.
|
Legal
Proceedings
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior
Court for the County of Los Angeles, California, a purported
class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock
against us, UPM-Kymenne Corporation (UPM) and
UPMs subsidiary Raflatac (Raflatac), seeking
treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive
practices, with allegations including that the defendants
attempted to limit competition among themselves through
anticompetitive understandings. Three similar complaints were
filed in various California courts. In November 2003, on
petition from the parties, the California Judicial Council
ordered the cases be coordinated for pretrial purposes. The
cases were assigned to a coordination trial judge in the
Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco on
March 30, 2004. On September 30, 2004, the Harman
Press amended its complaint to add Bemis Company Inc.s
subsidiary Morgan Adhesives Company (MACtac) as a
defendant. On January 21, 2005, American International
Distribution Corporation filed a purported class action on
behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court for
Chittenden County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by
Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court
of Johnson County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on
February 16, 2005 in the District Court of Scotts Bluff
County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a
purported multi-state class action on behalf of indirect
purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke County, Tennessee.
Without admitting liability, we agreed to pay plaintiffs
$2 million to resolve all claims related to the purported
state class actions in the states of Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee
and Vermont. Those settlements were approved by the Tennessee
court on March 12, 2010 and the complaints in those state
actions were dismissed with prejudice. We recorded
$2 million in the third quarter of 2009 in respect of the
settlement of those claims, and made that payment on
December 28, 2009. Also, without admitting liability, we
paid $2.5 million on July 15, 2010 to resolve all
claims in the California action. On December 8, 2010, the
California court granted final approval of the settlement and
dismissed all claims against us with prejudice. In respect of
settlement of this claim, we recorded $.7 million in the
fourth quarter of 2009 and $.3 million and
$1.5 million in the first and second quarters of 2010,
respectively.
We and our subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits,
claims, inquiries, and other regulatory and compliance matters,
which are either routine to the nature of our business, or,
based upon current information, if determined to be adverse for
us, are not expected to have a material effect on our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Environmental
Matters
As of January 1, 2011, we have been designated by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party
(PRP) at fourteen waste disposal or waste recycling
sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil
and/or
groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of our
liability has been agreed. We are participating with other PRPs
at such sites and anticipate that our share of cleanup costs
will be determined pursuant to remediation agreements entered
into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other
governmental authorities.
We have accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites
where it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the cost
or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because
of the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment
and remediation activities, future expense to remediate the
currently identified sites and any sites that could be
identified in the future for cleanup could be higher than the
liabilities accrued.
The activity in 2010 and 2009 related to environmental
liabilities was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
51.5
|
|
|
$
|
54.6
|
|
Purchase price adjustments related to acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
46.3
|
|
|
$
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
At year end 2010, approximately $9 million of the total
balance was classified as short-term.
These estimates could change depending on various factors, such
as modification of currently planned remedial actions, changes
in remediation technologies, changes in site conditions, changes
in the estimated time to complete remediation projects, changes
in laws and regulations affecting remediation requirements and
other factors.
Other
We participate in international receivable financing programs
with several financial institutions whereby advances may be
requested from these financial institutions. Such advances are
guaranteed by us. At year end 2010, we had guaranteed
approximately $14 million.
At year end 2010, we guaranteed up to approximately
$17 million of certain of our foreign subsidiaries
credit granted by suppliers and $393 million of certain of
our subsidiaries lines of credit with various financial
institutions.
Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies, in the Consolidated Financial Statements for
information regarding asset retirement obligations and product
warranties.
24 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
for the reporting period and as of the financial statement date.
These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities
and the reported amounts of revenue and expense. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Critical accounting policies are those that are important to the
portrayal of our financial condition and results, and which
require us to make difficult, subjective
and/or
complex judgments. Critical accounting policies cover accounting
matters that are inherently uncertain because the future
resolution of such matters is unknown. We believe that critical
accounting policies include accounting for revenue recognition,
sales returns and allowances, accounts receivable allowances,
inventory and inventory reserves, long-lived asset impairments,
goodwill, fair value measurements, pension and postretirement
benefits, income taxes, stock-based compensation, restructuring
and severance costs, litigation and environmental matters, and
business combinations.
Revenue
Recognition
Sales are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, pricing is determinable, delivery has occurred based on
applicable sales terms, and collection is reasonably assured.
Sales terms are generally free on board (f.o.b.) shipping point
or f.o.b. destination, depending upon local business customs.
For most regions in which we operate, f.o.b. shipping point
terms are utilized and sales are recorded at the time of
shipment, because this is when title and risk of loss are
transferred. In certain regions, notably in Europe, f.o.b.
destination terms are generally utilized and sales are recorded
when the products are delivered to the customers delivery
site, because this is when title and risk of loss are
transferred. Furthermore, sales, provisions for estimated
returns, and the cost of products sold are recorded at the time
title transfers to customers and when the customers assume the
risks and rewards of ownership. Actual product returns are
charged against estimated sales return allowances.
Sales rebates and discounts are common practice in the
industries in which we operate. Volume, promotional, price, cash
and other discounts and customer incentives are accounted for as
a reduction to gross sales. Rebates and discounts are recorded
based upon estimates at the time products are sold. These
estimates are based upon historical experience for similar
programs and products. We review such rebates and discounts on
an ongoing basis and accruals for rebates and discounts are
adjusted, if necessary, as additional information becomes
available.
Sales Returns and
Allowances
Sales returns and allowances represent credits we grant to our
customers (both affiliated and non-affiliated) for the return of
unsatisfactory product or a negotiated allowance in lieu of
return. We accrue for returns and allowances based upon the
gross price of the products sold and historical experience for
such products. We record these allowances based on the following
factors: (i) customer specific allowances; and (ii) an
estimated amount, based on our historical experience, for issues
not yet identified.
Accounts
Receivable Allowances
We are required to make judgments as to the collectability of
accounts receivable based on established aging policy,
historical experience and future expectations. The allowances
for doubtful accounts represent allowances for customer trade
accounts receivable that are estimated to be partially or
entirely uncollectible. These allowances are used to reduce
gross trade receivables to their net realizable value. We record
these allowances based on estimates related to the following
factors: (i) customer specific allowances;
(ii) amounts based upon an aging schedule; and
(iii) an estimated amount, based on our historical
experience, for issues not yet identified. No single customer
represented 10% or more of our net sales in, or trade accounts
receivable at year end of, 2010 or 2009. However, during 2010,
our ten largest customers by net sales represented 12% of our
net sales. As of January 1, 2011, our ten largest
customers by trade accounts receivable represented 13% of our
trade accounts receivable. These customers were primarily
concentrated in Office and Consumer Products segment. The
financial position and operations of these customers are
monitored on an ongoing basis.
Inventory and
Inventory Reserves
Inventories are stated at the
lower-of-cost-or-market
value and are categorized as raw materials,
work-in-progress
or finished goods. Cost is determined using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Inventory reserves are
recorded for matters such as damaged, obsolete, excess and
slow-moving inventory. We use estimates to record these
reserves. Slow-moving inventory is reviewed by category and may
be partially or fully reserved for depending on the type of
product and the length of time the product has been included in
inventory.
Impairment of
Long-lived Assets
We record impairment charges when the carrying amounts of
long-lived assets are determined not to be recoverable.
Impairment is measured by assessing the usefulness of an asset
or by comparing the carrying value of an asset to its fair
value. Fair value is typically determined using quoted market
prices, if available, or an estimate of undiscounted future cash
flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its
eventual disposition. The key estimates applied when preparing
cash flow projections relate to revenues, gross margins,
economic life of assets, overheads, taxation and discount rates.
The amount of impairment loss is calculated as the excess of the
carrying value over the fair value. Changes in market conditions
and management strategy have historically caused us to reassess
the carrying amount of our long-lived assets.
Goodwill
Our reporting units are composed of either a discrete business
or an aggregation of businesses with similar economic
characteristics. Our reporting units for the purpose of
performing the impairment tests for goodwill consist of roll
materials; retail information services; office and consumer
products; graphics and reflective products; industrial products;
and business media. For the purpose of performing the required
impairment tests, we primarily apply a present value (discounted
cash flow) method to determine the fair value of the reporting
units with goodwill. We perform our annual impairment test of
goodwill during the fourth quarter.
Certain factors may result in the need to perform an impairment
test prior to the fourth quarter, including significant
underperformance of our business relative to expected operating
results, significant adverse
25
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
(continued)
economic and industry trends, significant decline in our market
capitalization for an extended period of time relative to net
book value, or decision to divest an individual business within
a reporting unit.
We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using various
valuation techniques, with the primary technique being a
discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis
requires us to make various assumptions about sales, operating
margins, growth rates and discount rates. Assumptions about
discount rates are based on a weighted-average cost of capital
for comparable companies. Assumptions about sales, operating
margins, and growth rates are based on our forecasts, business
plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and
marketplace data. Assumptions are also made for varying
perpetual growth rates for periods beyond the long-term business
plan period.
Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The
first step is to identify if a potential impairment exists by
comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying
amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting
unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit
is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second
step of the impairment is not necessary. However, if the
carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the
second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired
and to measure the amount of impairment loss to recognize, if
any.
The second step, if necessary, compares the implied fair value
of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the implied
fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount, then
goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying
amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment
loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
Fair Value
Measurements
We define fair value as the price that would be received from
selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
When determining the fair value measurements for assets and
liabilities which are required to be recorded at fair value, we
consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we
would transact and the market-based risk measurements or
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability.
We determine fair value based on a three-tier fair value
hierarchy, which we use to prioritize the inputs used in
measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined
as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in
which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an
entity to develop its own assumptions to determine the best
estimate of fair value.
Pension and
Postretirement Benefits
Assumptions used in determining projected benefit obligations
and the fair value of plan assets for our pension plan and other
postretirement benefit plans are evaluated by management in
consultation with outside actuaries. In the event we determine
that changes are warranted in the assumptions used, such as the
discount rate, expected long-term rate of return, or health care
costs, future pension and postretirement benefit expenses could
increase or decrease. Due to changing market conditions or
changes in the participant population, the actuarial assumptions
we use may differ from actual results, which could have a
significant impact on our pension and postretirement liability
and related cost.
Discount
Rate
We, in consultation with our actuaries, annually review and
determine the discount rates to be used in connection with our
postretirement obligations. The assumed discount rate for each
pension plan reflects market rates for high quality corporate
bonds currently available. In the U.S., our discount rate is
determined by evaluating several yield curves consisting of
large populations of high quality corporate bonds. The projected
pension benefit payment streams are then matched with the bond
portfolios to determine a rate that reflects the liability
duration unique to our plans.
Long-term Return
on Assets
We determine the long-term rate of return assumption for plan
assets by reviewing the historical and expected returns of both
the equity and fixed income markets, taking into consideration
that assets with higher volatility typically generate a greater
return over the long run. Additionally, current market
conditions, such as interest rates, are evaluated and peer data
is reviewed to check for reasonability and appropriateness.
Healthcare Cost
Trend Rate
Our practice is to fund the cost of postretirement benefits on a
cash basis. For measurement purposes, an 8.5% annual rate of
increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits
was assumed for 2011. This rate is expected to decrease to
approximately 5% by 2018.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect temporary
differences between the amount of assets and liabilities for
financial and tax reporting purposes. Such amounts are adjusted,
as appropriate, to reflect changes in tax rates expected to be
in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation
allowance is recorded to reduce our deferred tax assets to the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Changes in
tax laws or accounting standards and methods may affect recorded
deferred taxes in future periods.
Income taxes have not been provided on certain undistributed
earnings of international subsidiaries because such earnings are
considered to be indefinitely reinvested.
When establishing a valuation allowance, we consider future
sources of taxable income such as future reversals of
existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income
exclusive of reversing temporary differences and
carryforwards and tax planning strategies. A
tax planning strategy is defined as an action that: is
prudent and feasible; an enterprise ordinarily might not take,
but would take to prevent an operating loss or tax credit
carryforward from expiring unused; and would result in
realization of deferred tax assets. In the event we
determine the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the
future, the valuation adjustment to the deferred tax assets will
be charged to earnings in the period in which we make such a
determination. We have also acquired certain net deferred tax
assets with existing valuation allowances. If it is later
determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets will be realized, we will release the valuation allowance
to current earnings or adjust the purchase price allocation.
We calculate our current and deferred tax provision based on
estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual
results reflected in
26 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
income tax returns filed in subsequent years. Adjustments based
on filed returns are recorded when identified.
Investment tax credits are accounted for in the period earned in
accordance with the flow-through method.
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits
by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. Our estimate of
the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is subject to
managements assessment of relevant risks, facts, and
circumstances existing at that time. We use a
more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement
recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. We record a liability for the
difference between the benefit recognized and measured and tax
position taken or expected to be taken on our tax return. To the
extent that our assessment of such tax positions changes, the
change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the
determination is made. We report tax-related interest and
penalties as a component of income tax expense.
We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there
will be a material change in the tax related balances or
valuation allowance balances. However, due to the complexity of
some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may be
materially different from the current estimate.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Valuation of
Stock Options
Our stock-based compensation expense is the estimated fair value
of options granted, amortized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period. The fair value of each of our stock
option awards is estimated as of the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires input
assumptions for our expected dividend yield, expected stock
price volatility, risk-free interest rate and the expected
option term.
Risk-free interest rate was based on the 52-week average
of the Treasury-Bond rate that has a term corresponding to the
expected option term.
Expected stock price volatility for options was
determined based on an average of implied and historical
volatility.
Expected dividend yield was based on the current annual
dividend divided by the
12-month
average of our monthly stock price prior to grant.
Expected option term was determined based on historical
experience under our stock option plans.
Forfeiture rate assumption was determined based on
historical data of our stock option forfeitures.
Certain of the assumptions used above are based on
managements estimates. If factors change and require us to
change our assumptions and estimates, our stock-based
compensation expense could be significantly different in the
future.
The fair value of certain stock-based awards that are subject to
performance metrics based on market conditions is determined
using the Monte-Carlo simulation model, which utilizes multiple
input variables, including expected volatility assumptions and
other assumptions appropriate for determining fair value to
estimate the probability of satisfying the market condition
target stipulated in the award.
We have not capitalized costs associated with stock-based
compensation.
Accounting for
Income Taxes for Stock-based Compensation
We elected to use the short-cut method to calculate the
historical pool of windfall tax benefits related to employee
stock-based compensation awards. In addition, we elected to
follow the tax ordering laws to determine the sequence in which
deductions and net operating loss carryforwards are utilized, as
well as the direct-only approach to calculating the amount of
windfall or shortfall tax benefits.
Restructuring and
Severance Costs
We have severance pay plans that provide eligible employees with
severance payments in the event of an involuntary termination
due to qualifying cost reduction actions. We calculate severance
pay using the severance benefit formula under the plans.
Accordingly, we record provisions for such amounts and other
related exit costs when they are probable and estimable. In the
absence of a plan or established local practice for overseas
jurisdictions, liabilities for severance and related costs are
recognized when incurred.
Litigation and
Environmental Matters
We are currently involved in various lawsuits, claims, inquiries
and other regulatory and compliance matters, most of which are
routine to the nature of our business. When it is probable that
obligations have been incurred and where a range of the cost of
compliance or remediation can be estimated, the best estimate
within the range or, if the most likely amount
cannot be determined, the low end of the range is
accrued. The ultimate resolution of these claims could affect
future results of operations should our exposure be materially
different from our estimates or should liabilities be incurred
that were not previously accrued.
Environmental expenditures are generally expensed. However,
environmental expenditures for newly acquired assets and those
which extend or improve the economic useful life of existing
assets are capitalized and amortized over the remaining asset
life. During each annual reporting period, we review our
estimates of costs of compliance with environmental laws related
to remediation and cleanup of various sites, including sites in
which governmental agencies have designated us a potentially
responsible party. When it is probable that obligations have
been incurred and where a range of the cost of compliance or
remediation can be estimated, the best estimate within the range
is accrued. When the best estimate within the range cannot be
determined, the low end of the range is accrued. Potential
insurance reimbursements are not offset against potential
liabilities, and such liabilities are not discounted.
Asset Retirement
Obligations
We recognize liabilities for the fair value of conditional asset
retirement obligations based on estimates determined through
present value techniques. An asset retirement is
conditional when the timing and (or) method of
settlement of the retirement obligation is conditioned upon a
future event that may or may not be within our control. Our
asset retirement obligations primarily relate to lease
restoration costs.
Business
Combinations
We record the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from
acquired businesses at fair value, and we make estimates and
assumptions to determine such fair values.
We utilize a variety of assumptions and estimates that are
believed to be reasonable in determining fair value for assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. These assumptions and
estimates include discounted cash flow analysis, growth rates,
discount rates, current replacement cost for similar capacity
for certain assets, market rate assumptions for certain
27
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
(continued)
obligations and certain potential costs of compliance with
environmental laws related to remediation and cleanup of
acquired properties. We also utilize information obtained from
management of the acquired businesses and our own historical
experience from previous acquisitions.
We apply significant assumptions and estimates in determining
certain intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions (such
as customer relationships, patents and other acquired
technology, and trademarks and trade names, as well as related
applicable useful lives), property, plant and equipment,
receivables, inventories, investments, tax accounts,
environmental liabilities, stock option awards, lease
commitments and restructuring and integration costs.
Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur, which may
affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates
or actual results. As such, decreases to fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed (including cost estimates for
certain obligations and liabilities) are recorded as an
adjustment to goodwill indefinitely, whereas increases to
estimates are recorded as an adjustment to goodwill during the
purchase price allocation period (generally within one year of
the acquisition date) and as operating expenses thereafter.
RECENT ACCOUNTING
REQUIREMENTS
During 2010, we adopted certain accounting and financial
disclosure requirements of the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB), none of which had a significant impact
on our financial results of operations and financial position.
Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information.
MARKET-SENSITIVE
INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk
Management
We are exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates and
foreign currency exchange rates.
Our policy is not to purchase or hold foreign currency, interest
rate or commodity contracts for trading purposes.
Our objective in managing the exposure to foreign currency
changes is to reduce the risk to our earnings and cash flow
associated with foreign exchange rate changes. As a result, we
enter into foreign exchange forward, option and swap contracts
to reduce risks associated with the value of our existing
foreign currency assets, liabilities, firm commitments and
anticipated foreign revenues and costs, when available and
appropriate. The gains and losses on these contracts are
intended to offset changes in the related exposures. We do not
hedge our foreign currency exposure in a manner that would
entirely eliminate the effects of changes in foreign exchange
rates on our consolidated net income.
Our objective in managing our exposure to interest rate changes
is to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and
cash flows. To achieve our objectives, we may periodically use
interest rate contracts to manage the exposure to interest rate
changes related to our borrowings.
Additionally, we enter into certain natural gas futures
contracts to reduce the risks associated with anticipated
domestic natural gas used in manufacturing and operations. These
amounts are not material to our financial statements.
In the normal course of operations, we also face other risks
that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks
principally include changes in economic or political conditions,
other risks associated with foreign operations, commodity price
risk and litigation risk, which are not represented in the
analyses that follow.
Foreign Exchange
Value-At-Risk
We use a
Value-At-Risk
(VAR) model to determine the estimated maximum
potential
one-day loss
in earnings associated with our foreign exchange positions and
contracts. This approach assumes that market rates or prices for
foreign exchange positions and contracts are normally
distributed. The VAR model estimates were made assuming normal
market conditions. Firm commitments, accounts receivable and
accounts payable denominated in foreign currencies, which
certain of these instruments are intended to hedge, were
included in the model. Forecasted transactions, which certain of
these instruments are intended to hedge, were excluded from the
model.
In 2010, the VAR was estimated using a variance-covariance
methodology. The currency correlation was based on one-year
historical data obtained from one of our domestic banks. The
estimated maximum potential
one-day loss
in earnings for our foreign exchange positions and contracts was
approximately $.8 million at year end 2010.
In 2009, the VAR was estimated using a variance-covariance
methodology based on historical volatility for each currency.
The volatility and correlation used in the calculation were
based on two-year historical data obtained from one of our
domestic banks. The estimated maximum potential
one-day loss
in earnings for our foreign exchange positions and contracts was
approximately $1 million at year end 2009.
In both 2010 and 2009, a 95% confidence level was used for a
one-day time
horizon.
The VAR model is a risk analysis tool and does not purport to
represent actual losses in fair value that could be incurred by
us, nor does it consider the potential effect of favorable
changes in market factors.
Interest Rate
Sensitivity
An assumed 19 basis point move in interest rates affecting
our variable-rate borrowings (10% of our weighted-average
interest rate on floating rate debt) would have had an estimated
$1 million effect on our 2010 earnings.
An assumed 25 basis point move in interest rates affecting
our variable-rate borrowings (10% of our weighted-average
interest rate on floating rate debt) would have had an estimated
$3 million effect on our 2009 earnings.
28 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
127.5
|
|
|
$
|
138.1
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $51.4 and $56.2 at
end of year 2010 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
996.1
|
|
|
|
918.6
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
519.9
|
|
|
|
477.3
|
|
Current deferred and refundable income taxes
|
|
|
144.7
|
|
|
|
103.5
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
163.7
|
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,951.9
|
|
|
|
1,733.2
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,262.9
|
|
|
|
1,354.7
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
940.8
|
|
|
|
950.8
|
|
Other intangibles resulting from business acquisitions, net
|
|
|
228.9
|
|
|
|
262.2
|
|
Non-current deferred and refundable income taxes
|
|
|
266.0
|
|
|
|
236.6
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
448.9
|
|
|
|
465.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,099.4
|
|
|
$
|
5,002.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
381.0
|
|
|
$
|
535.6
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
748.2
|
|
|
|
689.8
|
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
|
|
|
259.7
|
|
|
|
216.0
|
|
Accrued trade rebates
|
|
|
126.0
|
|
|
|
115.1
|
|
Current deferred and payable income taxes
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
263.7
|
|
|
|
270.4
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,831.8
|
|
|
|
1,867.7
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
956.2
|
|
|
|
1,088.7
|
|
Long-term retirement benefits and other liabilities
|
|
|
541.1
|
|
|
|
556.0
|
|
Non-current deferred and payable income taxes
|
|
|
124.6
|
|
|
|
127.8
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 7 and 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized
400,000,000 shares at end of year 2010 and 2009;
issued 124,126,624 shares at end of year 2010
and 2009; outstanding 105,391,940 shares and
105,298,317 shares at end of year 2010 and 2009,
respectively
|
|
|
124.1
|
|
|
|
124.1
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
768.0
|
|
|
|
722.9
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,727.9
|
|
|
|
1,499.7
|
|
Employee stock benefit trust, 1,784,741 shares and
6,744,845 shares
at end of year 2010 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
(73.2
|
)
|
|
|
(243.1
|
)
|
Treasury stock at cost, 16,934,943 shares and
12,068,462 shares
at end of year 2010 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
(758.2
|
)
|
|
|
(595.8
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(142.9
|
)
|
|
|
(145.2
|
)
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,645.7
|
|
|
|
1,362.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,099.4
|
|
|
$
|
5,002.8
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
29
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,512.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,952.7
|
|
|
$
|
6,710.4
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
4,686.7
|
|
|
|
4,366.2
|
|
|
|
4,983.4
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,826.0
|
|
|
|
1,586.5
|
|
|
|
1,727.0
|
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
1,370.4
|
|
|
|
1,268.8
|
|
|
|
1,304.3
|
|
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
191.3
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
|
351.3
|
|
|
|
(790.9
|
)
|
|
|
270.6
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
(44.2
|
)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
316.9
|
|
|
$
|
(746.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
266.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution
|
|
$
|
2.97
|
|
|
$
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
$
|
.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
105.8
|
|
|
|
103.6
|
|
|
|
98.4
|
|
Common shares, assuming dilution
|
|
|
106.8
|
|
|
|
103.6
|
|
|
|
98.7
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
30 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
unallocated
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock, $1
|
|
|
excess of
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
ESOP
|
|
|
benefit
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
par value
|
|
|
par value
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
trust
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended 2007
|
|
$
|
124.1
|
|
|
$
|
781.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,290.2
|
|
|
$
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(428.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(858.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
84.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,989.4
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266.1
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177.3
|
)
|
|
|
(177.3
|
)
|
Effective portion of gains or losses on cash flow hedges, net of
tax of $(.6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition asset,
net of tax of $(103.5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191.0
|
)
|
|
|
(191.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367.3
|
)
|
|
|
(367.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101.2
|
)
|
Repurchase of 195,221 shares for treasury, net of shares
issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
Stock issued under option plans, including $13.4 of tax and
dividends paid on stock held in stock trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
Dividends: $1.64 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175.0
|
)
|
ESOP transactions, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Employee stock benefit trust market value adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended 2008
|
|
|
124.1
|
|
|
|
642.9
|
|
|
|
2,381.3
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(246.9
|
)
|
|
|
(867.7
|
)
|
|
|
(282.5
|
)
|
|
|
1,750.0
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(746.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(746.7
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.4
|
|
|
|
103.4
|
|
Effective portion of gains or losses on cash flow hedges, net of
tax of $2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition asset,
net of tax of $6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.3
|
|
|
|
137.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(609.4
|
)
|
Issuance of 6,459,088 shares for treasury in conjunction
with HiMEDS conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312.9
|
|
Employee stock benefit trust transfer of 686,500 shares to
treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued under option plans, including $8.2 of tax and
dividends paid on stock held in stock trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.8
|
|
Dividends: $1.22 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134.9
|
)
|
ESOP transactions, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Employee stock benefit trust market value adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended 2009
|
|
|
124.1
|
|
|
|
722.9
|
|
|
|
1,499.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243.1
|
)
|
|
|
(595.8
|
)
|
|
|
(145.2
|
)
|
|
|
1,362.6
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316.9
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Effective portion of gains or losses on cash flow hedges, net of
tax of $1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition asset,
net of tax of $(3.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319.2
|
|
Issuance of 2,133,656 shares for treasury in conjunction
with HiMEDS remarketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.3
|
|
Repurchase of 2,683,243 shares for treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108.7
|
)
|
Employee stock benefit transfer of 4,316,894 shares to
treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163.0
|
|
|
|
(163.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued under stock option plans, including $4.4 of tax and
dividends paid on stock held in stock trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
Dividends: $.80 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88.7
|
)
|
Employee stock benefit trust market value adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended 2010
|
|
$
|
124.1
|
|
|
$
|
768.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,727.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(73.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(758.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(142.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,645.7
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
31
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
316.9
|
|
|
$
|
(746.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
266.1
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
172.9
|
|
|
|
187.6
|
|
|
|
204.6
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
79.7
|
|
|
|
73.8
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment and net loss on sale and disposal of assets of
$2.8, $9.4, and $6.5 in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Loss from debt extinguishments
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
Other non-cash expense and loss
|
|
|
43.6
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Other non-cash income and gain
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities and other adjustments, net of
the effect of business acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
(87.6
|
)
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(35.6
|
)
|
|
|
133.3
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(39.8
|
)
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
(30.0
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
76.5
|
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
(37.9
|
)
|
|
|
(19.2
|
)
|
Taxes on income
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(48.2
|
)
|
|
|
(91.0
|
)
|
|
|
(114.2
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
Long-term retirement benefits and other liabilities
|
|
|
(52.6
|
)
|
|
|
(40.0
|
)
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
486.7
|
|
|
|
569.0
|
|
|
|
539.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
(83.5
|
)
|
|
|
(69.7
|
)
|
|
|
(118.4
|
)
|
Purchase of software and other deferred charges
|
|
|
(25.1
|
)
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
(63.1
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131.2
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale (purchase) of investments, net
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(107.8
|
)
|
|
|
(105.8
|
)
|
|
|
(293.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in borrowings (maturities of 90 days or less)
|
|
|
(98.4
|
)
|
|
|
(192.3
|
)
|
|
|
(390.1
|
)
|
Additional borrowings (maturities longer than 90 days)
|
|
|
249.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400.1
|
|
Payments of debt (maturities longer than 90 days)
|
|
|
(341.2
|
)
|
|
|
(108.3
|
)
|
|
|
(50.7
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(88.7
|
)
|
|
|
(134.9
|
)
|
|
|
(175.0
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(108.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(391.5
|
)
|
|
|
(432.7
|
)
|
|
|
(208.5
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash balances
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(10.6
|
)
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
138.1
|
|
|
|
105.5
|
|
|
|
71.5
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
127.5
|
|
|
$
|
138.1
|
|
|
$
|
105.5
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
32 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of
Operations
Avery Dennison Corporation (the Company) is an
industry leader that develops innovative identification and
decorative solutions for businesses and consumers worldwide. The
Companys products include pressure-sensitive labeling
technology and materials; graphics imaging media; retail
branding and information solutions; radio-frequency
identification (RFID) inlays and tags; organization
and identification products for offices and consumers; specialty
tapes; and a variety of specialized labels for automotive,
industrial and durable goods applications.
Principles of
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
majority-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts, transactions
and profits are eliminated in consolidation. Investments
representing less than 20% ownership are accounted for using the
cost method of accounting.
Financial
Presentation
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation.
Segment
Reporting
The Company has determined that it has three reportable segments
for financial reporting purposes:
|
|
|
|
o
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials manufactures and sells
pressure-sensitive labeling technology and materials, films for
graphic and reflective applications, performance polymers
(largely adhesives used to manufacture pressure-sensitive
materials), and extruded films
|
|
o
|
Retail Information Services designs, manufactures
and sells a wide variety of branding and information products
and services, including brand and price tickets, tags and
labels, and related services, supplies and equipment
|
|
o
|
Office and Consumer Products manufactures and sells
a variety of office and consumer products, including labels,
binders, dividers, sheet protectors, and writing instruments
|
Certain operating segments are aggregated or combined based on
materiality, quantitative factors, and similar qualitative
economic characteristics, including primary products, production
processes, customers, and distribution methods. Operating
segments that do not exceed the quantitative thresholds or are
not considered for aggregation are reported in a category
entitled other specialty converting businesses,
which is comprised of several businesses that produce specialty
tapes and highly engineered labels, including RFID inlays and
labels and other converted products.
In 2010, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment contributed
approximately 56% of the Companys total sales, while the
Retail Information Services and Office and Consumer Products
segments contributed approximately 23% and 13%, respectively, of
the Companys total sales. The other specialty converting
businesses contributed the remaining 8% of the Companys
total sales. Of the Companys total sales in 2010,
international and domestic operations generated approximately
68% and 32%, respectively. Refer to Note 12, Segment
Information, for further information.
Fiscal
Year
Normally, each fiscal year consists of 52 weeks, but every
fifth or sixth fiscal year consists of 53 weeks. The
Companys 2010 and 2008 fiscal years consisted of 52-week
periods ending January 1, 2011 and December 27, 2008,
respectively. The Companys 2009 fiscal year consisted of a
53-week
period ending January 2, 2010, with the extra week
reflected in the first quarter.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, or GAAP, requires management to make estimates and
assumptions for the reporting period and as of the financial
statement date. These estimates and assumptions affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of
contingent liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and
expense. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, deposits in
banks, and short-term investments with maturities of three
months or less when purchased. The carrying value of these
assets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of the
instruments. Cash paid for interest and income taxes was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of capitalized amounts
|
|
$
|
69.7
|
|
|
$
|
78.3
|
|
|
$
|
114.6
|
|
Income taxes, net of refunds
|
|
|
94.5
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
In 2010, 2009, and 2008, non-cash activities included accruals
for capital expenditures of approximately $12 million,
$8 million, and $5 million, respectively, due to the
timing of payments. In 2010, the Company released approximately
4.3 million common shares, totaling $163 million, from
the Companys Employee Stock Benefit Trust
(ESBT), resulting from the settlement of the
Companys employee benefit obligations. These shares were
included as Treasury Stock at Cost in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Accounts
Receivable
The Company records trade accounts receivable at the invoiced
amount. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents
allowances for customer trade accounts receivable that are
estimated to be partially or entirely uncollectible. The
customer complaint reserve represents estimated sales returns
and allowances. These allowances are used to reduce gross trade
receivables to their net realizable values. The Company records
these allowances based on estimates related to the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
o
|
Customer-specific allowances
|
|
o
|
Amounts based upon an aging schedule
|
|
o
|
An estimated amount, based on the Companys historical
experience
|
No single customer represented 10% or more of the Companys
net sales in, or trade accounts receivable at year end of, 2010
or 2009. However, during 2010, the ten largest customers by net
sales represented 12% of the Companys net sales. As of
January 1, 2011, the ten largest customers by trade
accounts receivable represented 13% of the Companys trade
accounts receivable. These customers were primarily concentrated
in the Office and Consumer Products segment. The Company does
not generally require its customers to provide collateral.
33
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the
lower-of-cost-or-market
value and are categorized as raw materials,
work-in-progress
or finished goods. Cost is determined using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Inventory reserves are
recorded for matters such as damaged, obsolete, excess and
slow-moving inventory. The Company uses estimates to record
these reserves. Slow-moving inventory is reviewed by category
and may be partially or fully reserved for depending on the type
of product and the length of time the product has been included
in inventory.
Inventories at end of year were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
243.3
|
|
|
$
|
217.9
|
|
Work-in-progress
|
|
|
130.5
|
|
|
|
119.6
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
205.3
|
|
|
|
205.2
|
|
|
|
Inventories at lower of cost or market (approximates replacement
cost)
|
|
|
579.1
|
|
|
|
542.7
|
|
Inventory reserves
|
|
|
(59.2
|
)
|
|
|
(65.4
|
)
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
$
|
519.9
|
|
|
$
|
477.3
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant
and Equipment
Major classes of property, plant and equipment are stated at
cost and were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
65.1
|
|
|
$
|
68.4
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
738.1
|
|
|
|
764.1
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,325.7
|
|
|
|
2,334.8
|
|
Construction-in-progress
|
|
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
3,186.2
|
|
|
|
3,207.9
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,923.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1,853.2
|
)
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,262.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,354.7
|
|
|
|
Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging
from two to forty-five years for buildings and improvements and
two to fifteen years for machinery and equipment. Leasehold
improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the useful life
of the asset or the term of the associated leases. Maintenance
and repair costs are expensed as incurred; renewals and
betterments are capitalized. Upon the sale or retirement of
assets, the accounts are relieved of the cost and the related
accumulated depreciation, with any resulting gain or loss
included in net income. There were no significant capital lease
assets at year end 2010 and 2009.
Software
The Company capitalizes internal and external software costs
that are incurred during the application development stage of
the software development, including costs incurred for the
design, coding, installation to hardware, testing, and upgrades
and enhancements that provide additional functionalities and
capabilities to the software and hardware of the chosen path.
Internal and external software costs during the preliminary
project stage are expensed, as are those costs during the
post-implementation
and/or
operation stage, including internal and external training costs
and maintenance costs.
Capitalized software, which is included in Other
assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, is amortized on
a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the
software, ranging from two to ten years. Capitalized software
costs were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
$
|
381.7
|
|
|
$
|
364.0
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(238.7
|
)
|
|
|
(214.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
143.0
|
|
|
$
|
149.9
|
|
|
|
Impairment of
Long-lived Assets
Impairment charges are recorded when the carrying amounts of
long-lived assets are determined not to be recoverable.
Impairment is measured by assessing the usefulness of an asset
or by comparing the carrying value of an asset to its fair
value. Fair value is typically determined using quoted market
prices, if available, or an estimate of undiscounted future cash
flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its
eventual disposition. The key estimates applied when preparing
cash flow projections relate to revenues, gross margins,
economic life of assets, overheads, taxation and discount rates.
The amount of impairment loss is calculated as the excess of the
carrying value over the fair value. Historically, changes in
market conditions and management strategy have caused the
Company to reassess the carrying amount of its long-lived assets.
Goodwill and
Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions
Business combinations are accounted for by the purchase method,
and the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of
net tangible assets and identified intangible assets acquired is
considered goodwill. As a result, the Company discloses goodwill
separately from other intangible assets. Other identifiable
intangibles include customer relationships, patents and other
acquired technology, trade names and trademarks, and other
intangibles.
The Companys reporting units for the purpose of performing
the impairment tests for goodwill consist of roll materials;
retail information services; office and consumer products;
graphics and reflective products; industrial products; and
business media. In performing the required impairment tests, the
Company primarily applies a present value (discounted cash flow)
method to determine the fair value of the reporting units with
goodwill. The Company performs its annual impairment test of
goodwill during the fourth quarter.
Certain factors may result in the need to perform an impairment
test prior to the fourth quarter, including significant
underperformance of the Companys business relative to
expected operating results, significant adverse economic and
industry trends, significant decline in the Companys
market capitalization for an extended period of time relative to
net book value, or a decision to divest an individual business
within a reporting unit.
The Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units
using various valuation techniques, with the primary technique
being a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow
analysis requires the Company to make various assumptions about
sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates.
Assumptions about discount rates are based on a weighted-average
cost of capital for comparable companies. Assumptions about
sales, operating margins, and growth rates are based
34 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
on the Companys forecasts, business plans, economic
projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data.
Assumptions are also made for varying perpetual growth rates for
periods beyond the long-term business plan period.
Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The
first step is to identify if a potential impairment exists by
comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying
amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting
unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit
is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second
step of the impairment is not necessary. However, if the
carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the
second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired
and to measure the amount of impairment loss to recognize, if
any.
The second step, if necessary, compares the implied fair value
of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the implied
fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount, then
goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying
amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment
loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
See also Note 3, Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Resulting from Business Acquisitions.
Foreign
Currency
Asset and liability accounts of international operations are
translated into U.S. dollars at current rates. Revenues and
expenses are translated at the weighted-average currency rate
for the fiscal year. Translation gains and losses of
subsidiaries operating in hyperinflationary economies, if any,
are included in net income in the period incurred. Gains and
losses resulting from hedging the value of investments in
certain international operations and from translation of balance
sheet accounts are recorded directly as a component of other
comprehensive income.
Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions
are included in income in the period incurred. Transactions in
foreign currencies (including receivables, payables and loans
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency)
decreased net income by $5.8 million and $2.8 million
in 2010 and 2009, respectively, and increased net income by
$16.1 million in 2008. In 2008, transactions in foreign
currencies included a foreign currency net gain related to
certain intercompany transactions of approximately
$9 million. These amounts exclude the effects from
translation of foreign currencies on the Companys
financial statements.
The Company had no operations in hyperinflationary economies in
fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008.
Financial
Instruments
The Company enters into certain foreign exchange hedge contracts
to reduce its risk from exchange rate fluctuations associated
with receivables, payables, loans and firm commitments
denominated in certain foreign currencies that arise primarily
as a result of its operations outside the U.S. The Company
enters into certain interest rate contracts to help manage its
exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The Company also enters
into certain natural gas and other commodity futures contracts
to hedge price fluctuations for a portion of its anticipated
domestic purchases. The maximum length of time for which the
Company hedges its exposure to the variability in future cash
flows for forecasted transactions is generally 12 to
24 months.
On the date the Company enters into a derivative contract, it
determines whether the derivative will be designated as a hedge.
Those derivatives not designated as hedges are recorded on the
balance sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value
recognized in earnings. Those derivatives designated as hedges
are classified as either (1) a hedge of the fair value of a
recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment
(a fair value hedge); or (2) a hedge of a
forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows that are
to be received or paid in connection with a recognized asset or
liability (a cash flow hedge). The Company generally
does not purchase or hold any foreign currency, interest rate or
commodity contracts for trading purposes.
The Company assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on
an ongoing basis, whether hedges are highly effective. If it is
determined that a hedge is not highly effective, the Company
prospectively discontinues hedge accounting. For cash flow
hedges, the effective portion of the related gains and losses is
recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, and the
ineffective portion is reported in earnings. Amounts in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified
into earnings in the same period during which the hedged
forecasted transaction is consummated. In the event the
anticipated transaction is no longer likely to occur, the
Company recognizes the change in fair value of the instrument in
current period earnings. Changes in fair value hedges are
recognized in current period earnings. Changes in the fair value
of underlying hedged items (such as recognized assets or
liabilities) are also recognized in current period earnings and
offset the changes in the fair value of the derivative.
In the Statements of Cash Flows, hedge transactions are
classified in the same category as the item hedged, primarily in
operating activities.
See also Note 5, Financial Instruments.
Fair Value
Measurements
The Company defines fair value as the price that would be
received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability
in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements
for assets and liabilities which are required to be recorded at
fair value, the Company considers the principal or most
advantageous market in which the Company would transact and the
market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The Company determines fair value based on a three-tier fair
value hierarchy, which it uses to prioritize the inputs used in
measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined
as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in
which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an
entity to develop its own assumptions to determine the best
estimate of fair value.
Revenue
Recognition
Sales are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, pricing is determinable, delivery has occurred based on
applicable sales terms, and collection is reasonably assured.
Sales terms are generally free on board (f.o.b.) shipping point
or f.o.b. destination, depending upon local business customs.
For most regions in which the Company operates, f.o.b. shipping
point terms are utilized and sales are recorded at the time of
shipment, because this is when title and risk of loss are
transferred. In certain regions, notably in Europe, f.o.b.
destination terms are generally utilized and sales are recorded
when the products are delivered to the customers delivery
site, because this is when title and risk of loss are
35
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
transferred. Furthermore, sales, provisions for estimated
returns, and the cost of products sold are recorded at the time
title transfers to customers and when the customers assume the
risks and rewards of ownership. Actual product returns are
charged against estimated sales return allowances.
Sales rebates and discounts are common practice in the
industries in which the Company operates. Volume, promotional,
price, cash and other discounts and customer incentives are
accounted for as a reduction to gross sales. Rebates and
discounts are recorded based upon estimates at the time products
are sold. These estimates are based upon historical experience
for similar programs and products. The Company reviews such
rebates and discounts on an ongoing basis and accruals for
rebates and discounts are adjusted, if necessary, as additional
information becomes available.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs included in Marketing, general and
administrative expense were approximately $39 million
in 2010, $24 million in 2009, and $23 million in 2008.
The Companys policy is to expense advertising costs as
incurred.
Research and
Development
Research and development costs are related to research, design
and testing of new products and applications and are expensed as
incurred. Research and development expense was
$95.6 million in 2010, $90.7 million in 2009, and
$94 million in 2008.
Pension and
Postretirement Benefits
Assumptions used in determining projected benefit obligations
and the fair value of plan assets for the Companys pension
plans and other postretirement benefit plans are evaluated by
management in consultation with outside actuaries. In the event
that the Company determines that changes are warranted in the
assumptions used, such as the discount rate, expected long-term
rate of return, or health care costs, future pension and
postretirement benefit expenses could increase or decrease. Due
to changing market conditions or changes in the participant
population, the actuarial assumptions that the Company uses may
differ from actual results, which could have a significant
impact on the Companys pension and postretirement
liability and related cost. Refer to Note 6, Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefits, for further information
on such assumptions.
Product
Warranty
The Company provides for an estimate of costs that may be
incurred under its basic limited warranty at the time product
revenue is recognized. These costs primarily include materials
and labor associated with the service or sale of the product.
Factors that affect the Companys warranty liability
include the number of units installed or sold, historical and
anticipated rate of warranty claims on those units, cost per
claim to satisfy the Companys warranty obligation and
availability of insurance coverage. Because these factors are
impacted by actual experience and future expectations, the
Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability
and adjusts the amounts as necessary. The Companys
liability associated with product warranty was $1.7 million
and $2 million at year end 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Companys stock-based compensation expense is the
estimated fair value of options granted, amortized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The fair
value of the Companys stock option awards is estimated as
of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. This model requires input assumptions for the
Companys expected dividend yield, expected stock price
volatility, risk-free interest rate and the expected option term.
The fair value of certain stock-based awards that are subject to
performance metrics based on market conditions is determined
using the Monte-Carlo simulation model, which utilizes multiple
input variables, including expected volatility assumptions and
other assumptions appropriate for determining fair value to
estimate the probability of satisfying the market condition
target stipulated in the award.
The Company uses the short-cut method to calculate the
historical pool of windfall tax benefits related to employee
stock-based compensation awards. In addition, the Company
elected to follow the tax ordering laws to determine the
sequence in which deductions and net operating loss
carryforwards are utilized, as well as the direct-only approach
to calculating the amount of windfall or shortfall tax benefits.
See also Note 9, Shareholders Equity and
Stock-Based Compensation.
Environmental
Expenditures
Environmental expenditures are generally expensed. However,
environmental expenditures for newly acquired assets and those
which extend or improve the economic useful life of existing
assets are capitalized and amortized over the remaining asset
life. During each annual reporting period, the Company reviews
its estimates of costs of compliance with environmental laws
related to remediation and cleanup of various sites, including
sites in which governmental agencies have designated the Company
as a potentially responsible party. When it is probable that
obligations have been incurred and where a range of the cost of
compliance or remediation can be estimated, the best estimate
within the range is accrued. When the best estimate within the
range cannot be determined, the low end of the range is accrued.
Potential insurance reimbursements are not offset against
potential liabilities, and such liabilities are not discounted.
Refer to Note 8, Contingencies, for further
information.
Asset Retirement
Obligations
The Company recognizes a liability for the fair value of
conditional asset retirement obligations based on estimates
determined through present value techniques. An asset retirement
is conditional when the timing and (or) method of
settlement of the retirement obligation is conditional upon a
future event that may or may not be within the control of the
Company. The Companys asset retirement obligations
primarily relate to lease restoration costs. The Companys
estimated liability associated with asset retirement obligations
was $8 million and $7.9 million at year end 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Restructuring and
Severance Costs
The Company has severance pay plans that provide eligible
employees with severance payments in the event of an involuntary
termination due to qualifying cost reduction actions. Severance
pay is calculated by using a severance benefit formula under the
plans. Accordingly, the provisions for such amounts and other
related exit costs are recorded when they are
36 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
probable and estimable. In the absence of a plan or established
local practice for overseas jurisdictions, liabilities for
severance and related costs are recognized when incurred. See
also Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions.
Taxes on
Income
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect temporary
differences between the amount of assets and liabilities for
financial and tax reporting purposes. Such amounts are adjusted,
as appropriate, to reflect changes in tax rates expected to be
in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation
allowance is recorded to reduce the Companys deferred tax
assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. Changes in tax laws or accounting standards and
methods may affect recorded deferred taxes in future periods.
Income taxes have not been provided on certain undistributed
earnings of international subsidiaries because such earnings are
considered to be indefinitely reinvested.
When establishing a valuation allowance, the Company considers
future sources of taxable income such as future reversals
of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income
exclusive of reversing temporary differences and
carryforwards and tax planning strategies. A
tax planning strategy is defined as an action that: is
prudent and feasible; an enterprise ordinarily might not take,
but would take to prevent an operating loss or tax credit
carryforward from expiring unused; and would result in
realization of deferred tax assets. In the event the
Company determines that the deferred tax assets will not be
realized in the future, the valuation adjustment to the deferred
tax assets is charged to earnings in the period in which the
Company makes such a determination. The Company has also
acquired certain net deferred tax assets with existing valuation
allowances. If it is later determined that it is more likely
than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized, the
Company will release the valuation allowance to current earnings
or adjust the purchase price allocation.
The Company calculates its current and deferred tax provision
based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the
actual results reflected in income tax returns filed in
subsequent years. Adjustments based on filed returns are
recorded when identified.
Investment tax credits are accounted for in the period earned in
accordance with the flow-through method.
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to
ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities.
The Companys estimate of the potential outcome of any
uncertain tax issue is subject to managements assessment
of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that
time. The Company applies a more-likely-than-not threshold for
financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company
records a liability for the difference between the benefit
recognized and measured and the tax position taken or expected
to be taken on the tax return. To the extent that the
Companys assessment of such tax positions changes, the
change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the
determination is made. The Company reports tax-related interest
and penalties as a component of income tax expense.
The Company does not believe there is a reasonable likelihood
that there will be a material change in the tax related balances
or valuation allowance balances. However, due to the complexity
of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may be
materially different from the current estimate.
See also Note 11, Taxes Based on Income.
Net Income (Loss)
Per Share
Net income (loss) per common share amounts were computed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
316.9
|
|
|
$
|
(746.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
266.1
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
105.8
|
|
|
|
103.6
|
|
|
|
98.4
|
|
|
|
Dilutive shares (additional common shares issuable under
employee stock-based awards)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, assuming
dilution
|
|
|
106.8
|
|
|
|
103.6
|
|
|
|
98.7
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share (A)
¸
(B)
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution (A)
¸
(C)
|
|
$
|
2.97
|
|
|
$
|
(7.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
Certain employee stock-based awards were not included in the
computation of net income (loss) per common share, assuming
dilution, because they would not have had a dilutive effect.
Employee stock-based awards excluded from the computation
totaled approximately 9 million shares and 10 million
shares in 2010 and 2008, respectively.
In 2009, the effect of normally dilutive securities (for
example, stock-based awards) was not dilutive because the
Company generated a net operating loss. Employee stock-based
awards excluded from the computation totaled approximately
11 million shares in 2009.
As further discussed under Recent Accounting
Requirements below, effective at the beginning of 2009,
the Company adopted additional guidance from the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) regarding the
calculation of earnings per share. This did not have a material
impact on net income (loss) per share.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss), foreign
currency translation adjustment, net actuarial loss, prior
service cost and net transition assets, net of tax, and the
gains or losses on the effective portion of cash flow and firm
commitment hedges, net of tax, that are currently presented as a
component of shareholders equity.
37
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of
tax, with the exception of the foreign currency translation
adjustment) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
187.3
|
|
|
$
|
169.2
|
|
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition
assets, less amortization, net of tax benefits of $152.7 and
$149.4 at year end 2010 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
(321.2
|
)
|
|
|
(303.4
|
)
|
Net loss on derivative instruments designated as cash flow and
firm commitment hedges, net of tax benefits of $5.4 and $6.6 at
year end 2010 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(142.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(145.2
|
)
|
|
|
Cash flow and firm commitment hedging instrument activities in
other comprehensive loss, net of tax, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning accumulated derivative loss
|
|
$
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15.8
|
)
|
Net loss reclassified to earnings
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
Net change in the revaluation of hedging transactions
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
|
|
Ending accumulated derivative loss
|
|
$
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
|
Business
Combinations
The Company records the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
from acquired businesses at fair value, and the Company makes
estimates and assumptions to determine such fair values.
The Company utilizes a variety of assumptions and estimates that
are believed to be reasonable in determining fair value for
assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These assumptions and
estimates include estimated discounted cash flow analysis,
growth rates, discount rates, current replacement cost for
similar capacity for certain assets, market rate assumptions for
certain obligations and certain potential costs of compliance
with environmental laws related to remediation and cleanup of
acquired properties. The Company also utilizes information
obtained from management of the acquired businesses and its
historical experience from previous acquisitions.
The Company applies significant assumptions and estimates in
determining certain intangible assets resulting from the
acquisitions (such as customer relationships, patents and other
acquired technology, and trademarks and trade names, as well as
related applicable useful lives), property, plant and equipment,
receivables, inventories, investments, tax accounts,
environmental liabilities, stock option awards, lease
commitments and restructuring and integration costs.
Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur, which may
affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates
or actual results. As such, decreases to fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed (including cost estimates for
certain obligations and liabilities) are recorded as an
adjustment to goodwill indefinitely, whereas increases to the
estimates are recorded as an adjustment to goodwill during the
purchase price allocation period (generally within one year of
the acquisition date) and as operating expenses thereafter.
Recent Accounting
Requirements
In December 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting
standards related to goodwill which (1) modifies step one of the
goodwill impairment test by requiring entities with reporting
units that have a zero or negative carrying value to assess
whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment
exists, and (2) does not prescribe a specific method of
calculating the carrying value of a reporting unit in the
performance of step one of the goodwill impairment test. Under
the requirements of the amended standards, if the entity
concludes that it is more likely than not that a goodwill
impairment exists, an entity must perform step two of the
goodwill impairment test. In determining whether it is more
likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity
should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative
factors indicating that an impairment exists. This amendment
will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010. The Company does not expect this amendment to have a
material impact on the Companys financial results of
operations and financial condition.
In January 2010, the FASB updated the accounting guidance
regarding fair value measurement disclosure. This guidance
requires companies to disclose the amount of significant
transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair
value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers and for any
transfers in or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
In addition, the guidance clarifies certain existing disclosure
requirements. This updated guidance was effective at the
beginning of 2010 and did not have a material impact on the
Companys disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued changes to consolidation
accounting. Among other items, these changes respond to concerns
about the application of certain key provisions of previous
accounting standards, including those regarding the transparency
of the involvement with variable interest entities. The Company
adopted these changes at the beginning of 2010. These changes
did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification) as the single source
of authoritative non-governmental U.S. GAAP. The
Codification was effective for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification
changed the manner in which U.S. GAAP guidance is
referenced, but did not have any impact on the Companys
financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or
disclosures.
The FASB issued in May 2009, and amended in February 2010, a new
accounting standard on subsequent events. This standard defines
what qualifies as a subsequent event those events or
transactions that occur following the balance sheet date, but
before the financial statements are issued, or are available to
be issued. This standard was effective for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted
this accounting standard in the second quarter of 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued changes to disclosure
requirements regarding fair value of financial instruments,
which require disclosure about fair value of financial
instruments, whether recognized or not recognized in the
statements of financial position, in interim financial
information. These changes also require fair value information
to be presented together with the related carrying amount and
disclosure regarding the methods and significant assumptions
used to estimate fair value. These changes were effective for
interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with
early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. The Company has included the required disclosures in
Note 4, Debt.
38 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
The FASB issued in December 2007, and amended in April 2009, a
revised accounting standard for business combinations. This
standard defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control
of one or more businesses in the business combination and
establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer
achieves control. In general, this standard requires the
acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the fair
value of all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the
transaction; establishes the acquisition-date as the fair value
measurement point; and modifies the disclosure requirements.
This standard applies prospectively to business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
The adoption of this standard has not had a material impact on
the Companys financial results of operations and financial
condition as there have been no acquisitions since the effective
date.
In December 2008, the FASB issued changes to disclosure
requirements about postretirement benefit plan assets, which
provides additional guidance on an employers disclosures
about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other
postretirement plan. These changes were effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009. These changes increased the disclosures
in the financial statements related to the assets of the
Companys pension and postretirement benefits plans. These
disclosures are included in Note 6, Pension and Other
Postretirement Benefits.
In August 2008, the FASB issued additional accounting guidance
regarding defensive intangible assets. This guidance clarifies
that a defensive intangible asset should be accounted for as a
separate unit of accounting. This applies to all intangible
assets acquired, including intangible assets acquired in a
business combination, in situations in which the acquirer does
not intend to actively use the asset but intends to hold (lock
up) the asset to prevent its competitors from obtaining access
to the asset (defensive assets). This guidance was effective for
intangible assets acquired on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on December 15,
2008. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on
the Companys financial results of operations and financial
condition as there have been no acquisitions since the effective
date.
In June 2008, the FASB issued additional accounting guidance
regarding the effect of share-based payments transactions on the
computation of earnings per share. This guidance clarifies that
unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or
unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in
the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class
method. This guidance was effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008,
and interim periods within those years and required
retrospective application. The adoption of this guidance did not
have a material impact on the Companys financial results
of operations and financial condition as the Company does not
have participating securities.
In April 2008, the FASB issued changes to the method for
determining the useful life of intangible assets. These changes
modified factors that should be considered in developing renewal
or extension assumptions used for purposes of determining the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset. These changes were
intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset for purposes of determining
impairment and the period of expected cash flows used to measure
the fair value of the asset in a business combination and other
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These
changes were effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of these changes did not
have a material impact on the Companys financial results
of operations and financial condition.
In March 2008, the FASB issued changes to disclosure
requirements regarding derivative instruments and hedging
activities. These changes were intended to improve transparency
in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures of an
entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities and
their effects on the entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. These disclosure requirements apply
to all derivative instruments as well as related hedged items,
bifurcated derivatives, and non-derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with
such instruments must provide more robust qualitative
disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. These changes
were effective prospectively for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. The
Company has included the required disclosures in Note 5,
Financial Instruments.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on
non-controlling interests. This standard was effective for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after
December 15, 2008, with earlier adoption prohibited. This
standard requires the recognition of a non-controlling interest
(minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial
statements and separate from the parents equity. The
amount of net income attributable to the non-controlling
interest will be included in consolidated net income on the
statements of operations. This standard also includes expanded
disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent
and its non-controlling interest. The adoption of this standard
did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on
fair value measurements, which was effective for fiscal years
and interim periods after November 15, 2007. This standard
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and expands the related disclosure requirements. This
standard applies to all financial assets and liabilities and to
all non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis. This standard indicates, among other things,
that a fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to
sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal
market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a
principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or
liability. This standard defines fair value based upon an exit
price model. The Company applied the provisions of this standard
to assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis as
of the beginning of the 2009 fiscal year. The adoption of this
standard did not have a significant impact on the Companys
financial results of operations or financial position.
Transactions with
Related Persons
From time to time, the Company enters into transactions in the
normal course of business with related persons. Management
believes that such transactions are on terms that would have
been obtained from unaffiliated third persons.
One of the Companys directors, Peter W. Mullin, is the
chairman, chief executive officer and majority stockholder in
various entities (collectively referred to as the Mullin
Companies), which previously provided executive
compensation, benefit consulting and insurance agency services.
In October 2008, the above described operations of the Mullin
39
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
Companies were sold to a subsidiary of Prudential Financial,
Inc. (Prudential). During 2010, the Company paid
premiums to insurance carriers for life insurance originally
placed by the Mullin Companies in connection with various
Company employee benefit plans (however, the interests of the
Mullin Companies in this insurance were sold to Prudential in
October 2008). Prudential has advised the Company that it earned
commissions from such insurance carriers in an aggregate amount
of approximately $.4 million, $.4 million, and
$.6 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively, for the
placement and renewal of this insurance, in which
Mr. Mullin had an interest of approximately
$.09 million, $.09 million, and $.3 million in
2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Mr. Mullins
interest in the 2010 and 2009 commissions was determined in
accordance with the terms of a commission sharing agreement
entered into between Mr. Mullin and Prudential at the time
of the sale.
The Mullin Companies own a minority interest in M Financial
Holdings, Inc. (MFH). Substantially all of the life
insurance policies, which the Company originally placed through
the Mullin Companies, are issued by insurance carriers that
participate in reinsurance agreements entered into between these
insurance carriers and M Life Insurance Company (M
Life), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFH. Reinsurance
returns earned by M Life are determined annually by the
insurance carriers and can be negative or positive, depending
upon the results of M Lifes aggregate reinsurance pool,
which consists of the insured lives reinsured by M Life. The
Mullin Companies have advised that in 2010, 2009 and 2008 they
participated in net reinsurance gains (without risk of
forfeiture) of M Life, of which approximately $.2 million,
none and $.2 million, respectively, of such gains were
ascribed by M Life to the Companys life insurance policies
referred to above, and in which gains Mr. Mullin had an
interest of approximately $.1 million, none and
$.1 million, respectively. In addition, the Mullin
Companies have advised that in 2010, 2009 and 2008, they also
participated in net reinsurance gains of M Life that are subject
to risk of forfeiture, of which approximately $.03 million,
none and $.05 million, respectively, of such gains were
ascribed by M Life to the Companys life insurance
policies, and in which gains Mr. Mullin had an interest of
approximately $.02 million, none and $.04 million,
respectively.
NOTE 2. ACQUISITIONS
On April 1, 2008, the Company acquired DM Label Group
(DM Label). DM Label operations are included in the
Companys Retail Information Services segment.
NOTE 3. GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLES RESULTING FROM BUSINESS
ACQUISITIONS
Results from the Companys annual impairment test in the
fourth quarter of 2010 indicated that no impairment had occurred
in 2010.
In connection with the preparation of its first quarter 2009
financial statements, the Company determined that there was a
need to initiate an interim impairment test of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets (goodwill
impairment). The factors considered included both a
sustained decline in the Companys stock price and a
decline in the Companys 2009 revenue projections for the
retail information services reporting unit, following lower than
expected revenues in March 2009, which continued in April 2009.
The peak season for the retail information services reporting
unit has traditionally been March through the end of the second
quarter.
The Companys interim impairment analysis indicated that
the fair value of each of the Companys reporting units
exceeded its carrying value, except for the Companys
retail information services reporting unit, which had a fair
value less than its carrying value. In evaluating the fair value
of the retail information services reporting unit, the Company
assumed further declines in revenue for 2009 from 2008,
reflecting continued and further weakness in the retail apparel
market. The Company then assumed that revenues by 2012 would
increase to levels comparable with 2007 (including estimated
sales for Paxar Corporation (Paxar), a business
acquired in 2007, and DM Label, adjusted for foreign currency
translation). The Company also assumed a discount rate of 14.5%
reflecting the increased uncertainty of global economic
conditions in the first three months of 2009.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded non-cash
impairment charges of $832 million for the retail
information services reporting unit, of which $820 million
was related to goodwill and $12 million was related to
indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company completed its
interim goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of 2009,
with no additional impairment charge recorded thereafter.
Results from the Companys annual impairment test in the
fourth quarter of 2009 indicated that no further impairment had
occurred.
The primary factors contributing to the $832 million of
non-cash impairment charges relative to the Companys
goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2008 were the
assumed increase in the discount rate, the reduced assumptions
for revenue growth through 2013, and the associated cash flow
impact from these reduced projections. The change in these
factors reflected worsening economic projections and market
conditions.
40 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
Goodwill
Changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill from operations
for 2010 and 2009, by reportable segment, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive
|
|
|
Information
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
converting
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Materials
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 27, 2008
|
|
$
|
334.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,211.6
|
|
|
$
|
167.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,716.7
|
|
Acquisition
adjustments(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
Goodwill impairment
charges(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(820.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(820.0
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 2, 2010
|
|
|
351.4
|
|
|
|
422.8
|
|
|
|
173.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
950.8
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
351.4
|
|
|
|
1,242.8
|
|
|
|
173.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
1,770.8
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(820.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(820.0
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 2, 2010
|
|
|
351.4
|
|
|
|
422.8
|
|
|
|
173.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
950.8
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.7
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(.1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2011
|
|
|
346.0
|
|
|
|
423.2
|
|
|
|
168.1
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
940.8
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
346.0
|
|
|
|
1,243.2
|
|
|
|
168.1
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
1,760.8
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(820.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(820.0
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
346.0
|
|
|
$
|
423.2
|
|
|
$
|
168.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
940.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Acquisition adjustments in 2009
consisted of opening balance sheet adjustments associated with
the DM Label acquisition in April 2008 of $32.6 and other
acquisition adjustments of $(1.7).
|
|
(2)
|
|
As part of the interim goodwill
impairment test completed in the second quarter of 2009, the
Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $820 for the
retail information services reporting unit in the first quarter
of 2009, with no additional impairment charge recorded
thereafter.
|
Indefinite-Lived
Intangible Assets
In connection with the acquisition of Paxar, the Company
acquired approximately $30 million of indefinite-lived
intangible assets, consisting of certain trade names and
trademarks, which are not subject to amortization because they
have an indefinite useful life. In the first quarter of 2009,
the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of
$12 million related to these indefinite-lived intangible
assets, with no additional impairment charge recorded
thereafter. At January 1, 2011, the carrying value of these
indefinite-lived intangible assets was $18 million. At
January 2, 2010, the carrying value of these
indefinite-lived intangible assets was $17.9 million, which
included $.1 million of negative currency impact.
Finite-Lived
Intangible Assets
The following table sets forth the Companys finite-lived
intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions at
January 1, 2011 and January 2, 2010, which continue to
be amortized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
291.9
|
|
|
$
|
119.2
|
|
|
$
|
172.7
|
|
|
$
|
295.0
|
|
|
$
|
94.8
|
|
|
$
|
200.2
|
|
Patents and other acquired technology
|
|
|
53.6
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
53.6
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
Trade names and trademarks
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
404.7
|
|
|
$
|
193.8
|
|
|
$
|
210.9
|
|
|
$
|
409.5
|
|
|
$
|
165.2
|
|
|
$
|
244.3
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense on finite-lived intangible assets resulting
from business acquisitions was $32.9 million for 2010,
$33.5 million for 2009, and $32.8 million for 2008.
The estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible
assets resulting from completed business acquisitions for each
of the next five fiscal years is expected to be approximately
$33 million in 2011, $33 million in 2012,
$31 million in 2013, $28 million in 2014, and
$24 million in 2015.
41
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
As of January 1, 2011, the weighted-average amortization
periods from the date of acquisition and weighted-average
remaining useful lives of finite-lived intangible assets were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortization periods
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
|
from the date of
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
(In years)
|
|
acquisition
|
|
|
useful life
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Patents and other acquired technology
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Trade names and trademarks
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4. DEBT
Short-term variable rate domestic borrowings from commercial
paper issuances were approximately $298 million
(weighted-average interest rate of .4%) at January 1, 2011
and approximately $415 million (weighted-average interest
rate of .2%) at January 2, 2010.
The Company had $81.8 million (weighted-average interest
rate of 10.6%) and $60.1 million (weighted-average interest
rate of 12.8%) of borrowings outstanding under foreign
short-term lines of credit at January 1, 2011 and
January 2, 2010, respectively.
Uncommitted lines of credit were approximately $407 million
at January 1, 2011 and may be cancelled at any time by the
Company or the banks.
Available short-term financing arrangements totaled
$1.03 billion at January 1, 2011.
Commitment fees related to the Companys committed lines of
credit in 2010, 2009, and 2008 were $2.6 million,
$2.3 million, and $.8 million, respectively.
Long-term debt and its respective weighted-average interest
rates at January 1, 2011 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Medium-term notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series 1995 at 7.5% due 2015 through 2025
|
|
$
|
50.0
|
|
|
$
|
50.0
|
|
Long-term notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340.0
|
|
Senior notes due 2013 at 4.8%
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
Senior notes due 2017 at 6.6%
|
|
|
249.2
|
|
|
|
249.0
|
|
HiMEDS Senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.4
|
|
Senior notes due 2020 at 5.4%
|
|
|
249.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes due 2033 at 6.0%
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
Other long-term borrowings
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
.8
|
|
Less amount classified as current
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(60.5
|
)
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
956.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,088.7
|
|
|
|
The Companys medium-term notes have maturities from 2015
through 2025 and accrue interest at various fixed rates.
Maturities of long-term debt during the years 2011 through 2015
are $1.2 million (classified as current),
$2.3 million, $252 million, $1.6 million and
$5.6 million, respectively, with $694.7 million
maturing in 2016 and thereafter.
In March 2009, the Company completed an exchange of
approximately 6.6 million units (or 75.15%) of its HiMEDS
units. The Company issued approximately 6.5 million shares
of its common stock and paid approximately $43 million in
cash for the exchanged HiMEDS units with a carrying value of
approximately $331 million. As a result of this exchange,
the Company recorded a debt extinguishment loss of approximately
$21 million (included in Other expense, net in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations) in the first quarter
of 2009, which included a write-off of $9.6 million related
to unamortized debt issuance costs. In November 2010, the
Company completed the remarketing of its remaining HiMEDS senior
notes in accordance with the original terms of the HiMEDS units
by purchasing approximately $109 million of these senior
notes. In aggregate, this remarketing resulted in the
extinguishment of approximately $109 million of senior
notes and the issuance of approximately 2.1 million shares
of the Companys common stock. As a result of this
remarketing, the Company recorded a debt extinguishment loss of
$2.8 million (included in Other expense, net in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations), which consisted of a
write-off related to unamortized debt issuance costs.
In January 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to a
credit agreement for a $1 billion revolving credit facility
(the Revolver) with certain domestic and foreign
banks, maturing August 10, 2012. The amendment increased
the Companys flexibility for a specified period of time in
complying with the financial covenants to which the Revolver is
subject and excluded certain restructuring charges from the
calculation of the financial ratios under those covenants.
Additionally, the amendment increased the annual interest rate
of the Revolver and provided for an increase in the facility fee
payable under the Revolver. Financing available under the
Revolver was used as a commercial paper
back-up
facility and to finance other corporate requirements.
In January 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
entered into an amendment to a credit agreement for a
$400 million term loan credit facility (Credit
Facility) with certain domestic and foreign banks. The
subsidiarys payment and performance under the agreement
were guaranteed by the Company. Financing available under the
Credit Facility was permitted to be used for working capital and
other general corporate purposes. The amendment increased the
Companys flexibility for a specified period of time in
complying with the financial covenants to which the Credit
Facility is subject and excluded certain restructuring charges
from the calculation of the financial ratios under those
covenants. The amendment also increased the annual interest rate
of the Credit Facility. In April 2010, the Company issued $250
million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 5.375% per
year, due April 2020. Approximately $248 million in
proceeds from the offering, net of underwriting discounts and
offering expenses, were used, together with commercial paper
borrowings, to repay the $325 million in indebtedness
outstanding under the Credit Facility in May 2010. In the second
quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a debt extinguishment loss
of $1.2 million related to unamortized debt issuance costs
from the Credit Facility.
42 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
As of January 1, 2011, the Company was in compliance with
its financial covenants.
The Companys total interest costs in 2010, 2009 and 2008
were $80.6 million, $89.5 million and
$122.1 million, respectively, of which $4 million,
$4.2 million and $6.2 million, respectively, were
capitalized as part of the cost of assets.
The fair value of the Companys long-term debt is estimated
primarily based on the credit spread above U.S. Treasury
securities on comparable notes with similar rates, credit
rating, and remaining maturities. The fair value of the
Companys total debt, including short-term borrowings, was
$1.39 billion at January 1, 2011 and
$1.60 billion at January 2, 2010. Fair value amounts
were determined primarily based on Level 2 inputs. Refer to
Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies.
The Company had standby letters of credit with an aggregate
contract amount of outstanding totaling $41.1 million and
$52.5 million at January 1, 2011 and January 2, 2010,
respectively. The aggregate contract amount of outstanding
standby letters of credit approximated fair value.
|
|
NOTE 5.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
As of January 1, 2011, the U.S. dollar equivalent
notional values of the Companys outstanding commodity
contracts and foreign exchange contracts were approximately
$6.9 million and $1.18 billion, respectively.
The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either
assets or liabilities at fair value in the statements of
financial position. The Company designates commodity forward
contracts on forecasted purchases of commodities and foreign
currency contracts on forecasted transactions as cash flow
hedges and foreign currency contracts on existing balance sheet
items as fair value hedges.
In April 2010, the Company entered into a contract to lock in
the Treasury rate component of the interest rate on its
$250 million debt issuance, which is discussed in
Note 4, Debt. On April 9, 2010, the
contract settled at a loss of $.3 million, which is being
amortized into interest expense over the term of the related
debt.
The following table provides the balances and locations of
derivatives as of January 1, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
7.9
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the balances and locations of
derivatives as of January 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative, as well as
the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to
the hedged risk, are recognized in current earnings, resulting
in no net material impact to income.
The following table provides the components of the gain (loss)
recognized in income related to fair value hedging contracts.
The corresponding gains or losses on the underlying hedged items
approximated the net gain on these fair value hedging contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) in Income
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.8
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36.8
|
|
|
$
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow
Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on
the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive
income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period
or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge
ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment
of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.
The following table provides the components of the loss
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on
derivatives (effective portion) related to cash flow hedging
contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
$
|
(.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10.4
|
)
|
|
|
43
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
The following table provides the components of the loss
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
(effective portion) related to cash flow hedging contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Location of Loss in Income
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.9
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15.2
|
)
|
|
|
The amount of gain or loss recognized in income related to the
ineffective portion of, and the amounts excluded from,
effectiveness testing for cash flow hedges and derivatives not
designated as hedging instruments was not significant in 2010
and 2009.
As of January 1, 2011, a net loss of approximately
$8 million is expected to be reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive loss to earnings within the next
12 months.
|
|
NOTE 6.
|
PENSION AND OTHER
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
Defined Benefit
Plans
The Company sponsors a number of defined benefit plans covering
eligible U.S. employees and employees in certain other
countries. The Company makes contributions that are sufficient
to meet the minimum funding requirements of applicable laws and
regulations, plus additional amounts, if any, that management
determines to be appropriate, to these plans. Benefits payable
to employees are based primarily on years of service and
employees pay during their employment with the Company.
Certain benefits provided by one of the Companys
U.S. defined benefit plans may be paid, in part, from an
employee stock ownership plan. While the Company has not
expressed any intent to terminate these plans, the Company may
do so at any time, subject to applicable laws and regulations.
The Company is also obligated to pay unfunded termination
indemnity benefits to certain employees outside of the U.S.
These benefits are subject to applicable agreements, local laws
and regulations. The Company has not incurred significant costs
related to performance under these types of arrangements and the
associated liability is not included in the disclosures below.
The Companys U.S. defined benefit pension plans and
early retiree medical plan were closed to employees hired after
December 31, 2008. Employees who participated in these
plans before December 31, 2008 continued to participate and
accrue pension benefits after satisfying the eligibility
requirements of these plans.
Effective December 31, 2010, benefits for three of the
Companys U.S. defined benefit plans the
Avery Dennison Pension Plan (ADPP), the Benefit
Restoration Plan (BRP), and the Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) were
frozen. Benefits under these plans stopped accruing; however,
pension benefits accrued through December 31, 2010 were
preserved and will be paid out (for employees fully vested at
the time of retirement or other qualified event) under the terms
of their respective plans. As a result of freezing the ADPP and
BRP, the Company recognized a curtailment loss of
$2.4 million in 2010, recorded in Other expense,
net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. No
curtailment gain or loss was recognized from freezing the SERP,
as future service continues to impact the plans benefits
and the determination of the value is not known until retirement
of the participants. In connection with the freezing of the
SERP, the Company granted an aggregate of approximately
.2 million of stock options to the active SERP
participants, which resulted in approximately $2.2 million
of pretax stock-based compensation expense in the fourth quarter
of 2010. This expense reflected the immediate recognition of
compensation cost associated with those stock options granted to
employees who are retirement eligible, as defined in the
Companys stock option and incentive plan. Refer to
Note 9, Shareholders Equity and Stock-based
Compensation.
Additionally, settlement events in Canada, Belgium, and Korea
resulted in the Companys recognition of a $2.3 million
settlement loss in 2010.
Plan
Assets
Assets of the Companys U.S. defined benefit pension
plans are invested in a diversified portfolio that consists
primarily of equity and fixed income securities. Furthermore,
equity investments are diversified across U.S. and
non-U.S. stocks,
including growth, value, and both small and large capitalization
stocks. The Companys target plan asset investment
allocation in the U.S. is 75% in equity securities and 25%
in fixed income securities and cash, subject to periodic
fluctuations in these respective asset classes. The investment
objective of the plans is to maximize the total rate of return
(income and appreciation) within the limits of prudent
risk-taking and Section 404 of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The plans are
diversified across asset classes, striving to achieve an optimal
balance between risk and return and between income and capital
appreciation. Because many of the pension liabilities are
long-term,
the investment horizon is also long-term, but the investment
plan must also ensure adequate near-term liquidity to meet
benefit payments.
Assets of the Companys international plans are invested in
accordance with local accepted practices and include equity
securities, fixed income securities, insurance contracts and
cash. Asset allocations and investments vary by country and
plan. The Companys target plan asset investment allocation
for its international plans combined is 54% in equity
securities, 37% in fixed income securities and cash, and 8% in
insurance contracts and other investments, subject to periodic
fluctuations in these respective asset classes.
The weighted-average asset allocations for the Companys
defined benefit pension plans at end of year 2010 and 2009, by
asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Fixed income securities and cash
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Insurance contracts and other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
44 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
Fair Value
Measurements
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies
used for assets measured at fair value:
Cash is valued at nominal value. Money market funds are valued
at a net asset value (NAV). Mutual funds are valued
at fair value as determined by quoted market prices, based upon
the NAV of shares held by the plans at year end. Pooled funds,
which include real estate pooled funds and multi-asset common
trust funds are comprised of shares or units in funds that are
not publicly traded and are valued at net unit value, as
determined by the funds trustees based on the underlying
securities in the trust. Equities are valued at the closing
price reported on the active market on which the individual
securities are traded. Real estate investment trusts are valued
based on quoted prices in active markets. Bonds and debentures
consist primarily of government bonds, corporate bonds, and
financial debentures, and are valued at average price provided
by independent pricing companies. Insurance contracts are valued
at book value, which approximates fair value and is calculated
using the prior year balance plus or minus investment returns
and changes in cash flows.
The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation
that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective
of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes
the valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other
market participants, the use of different methodologies or
assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial
instruments could result in a different fair value measurement
at the reporting date.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value
hierarchy, the U.S. plans assets at fair value as of
year end 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds U.S. bonds
|
|
|
109.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
165.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities U.S. growth
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities U.S. value
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities international
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual fund international
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds U.S. equities
|
|
|
140.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds international
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
|
373.9
|
|
|
|
198.9
|
|
|
|
175.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. plan assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
539.7
|
|
|
$
|
199.1
|
|
|
$
|
340.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Other
assets(1)
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. plan assets
|
|
$
|
540.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Included accrued receivables and
pending broker settlements at year end 2010.
|
45
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value
hierarchy, the international plans assets at fair value as
of year end 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds European bonds
|
|
|
179.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
179.7
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
179.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds global
|
|
|
79.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds European region
|
|
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds Asia Pacific region
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds U.S.
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds emerging markets
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds real estate investment trusts
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
|
198.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds other
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance contracts
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
Total other investments
|
|
|
44.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
Total international plan assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
426.0
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
394.3
|
|
|
$
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
Other
assets(1)
|
|
|
.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total international plan assets
|
|
$
|
426.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Included accrued receivables and
pending broker settlements at year end 2010.
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of Level 3
assets held during the year ended January 1, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 2, 2010
|
|
$
|
26.9
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain
|
|
|
.8
|
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
(.3
|
)
|
Net transfers in (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
|
(.1
|
)
|
|
|
Ending balance at January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
46 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value
hierarchy, the U.S. plans assets at fair value as of
year end 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
.3
|
|
|
$
|
.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds
|
|
|
97.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
138.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
174.9
|
|
|
|
174.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds
|
|
|
137.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
|
327.4
|
|
|
|
190.1
|
|
|
|
137.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate investment trusts
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. plan assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
467.9
|
|
|
$
|
192.3
|
|
|
$
|
275.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Other
assets(1)
|
|
|
(.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. plan assets
|
|
$
|
467.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Included accrued receivables and
pending broker settlements at year end 2009.
|
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value
hierarchy, the international plans assets at fair value as
of year end 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and debentures
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled funds
|
|
|
179.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
181.0
|
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
180.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity pooled funds
|
|
|
163.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance contracts
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
Real estate pooled funds
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-asset common trust funds
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total international plan assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
401.7
|
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
$
|
369.9
|
|
|
$
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
Other
assets(1)
|
|
|
.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total international plan assets
|
|
$
|
402.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Included accrued receivables and
pending broker settlements at year end 2009.
|
47
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
The following table presents a reconciliation of Level 3
assets held during the year ended January 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at December 27, 2008
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain
|
|
|
.9
|
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Net transfers in (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at January 2, 2010
|
|
$
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
Health Benefits
The Company provides postretirement health benefits to certain
U.S. retired employees up to the age of 65 under a
cost-sharing arrangement, and provides supplemental Medicare
benefits to certain U.S. retirees over the age of 65. The
Companys policy is to fund the cost of the postretirement
benefits on a cash basis. While the Company has not expressed
any intent to terminate postretirement health benefits, the
Company may do so at any time.
Plan
Assumptions
Discount
Rate
The Company, in consultation with its actuaries, annually
reviews and determines the discount rates to be used in
connection with its postretirement obligations. The assumed
discount rate for each pension plan reflects market rates for
high quality corporate bonds currently available. In the U.S.,
the Companys discount rate was determined by evaluating
several yield curves consisting of large populations of high
quality corporate bonds. The projected pension benefit payment
streams were then matched with the bond portfolios to determine
a rate that reflected the liability duration unique to the
Companys plans.
Long-term Return
on Assets
The Company determines the long-term rate of return assumption
for plan assets by reviewing the historical and expected returns
of both the equity and fixed income markets, taking into
consideration that assets with higher volatility typically
generate a greater return over the long run. Additionally,
current market conditions, such as interest rates, are evaluated
and peer data is reviewed to check for reasonability and
appropriateness.
Healthcare Cost
Trend Rate
The Companys practice is to fund the cost of
postretirement benefits on a cash basis. For measurement
purposes, an 8.5% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost
of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2011. This rate
is expected to decrease to approximately 5% by 2018.
A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-percentage-point
|
|
|
One-percentage-point
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
increase
|
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
|
|
$
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
(.2
|
)
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
Plan Balance
Sheet Reconciliations
The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations,
plan assets, funded status of the plans and accumulated other
comprehensive income:
Plan Benefit
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in projected benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
693.6
|
|
|
$
|
465.8
|
|
|
$
|
611.9
|
|
|
$
|
449.9
|
|
|
$
|
37.0
|
|
|
$
|
31.8
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Participant contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Amendments
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Plan
transfer(1)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(37.8
|
)
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
(41.2
|
)
|
|
|
(20.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Net transfer in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension curtailment
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)
|
|
|
(.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
settlements(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
744.8
|
|
|
$
|
504.7
|
|
|
$
|
693.6
|
|
|
$
|
465.8
|
|
|
$
|
38.7
|
|
|
$
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
742.3
|
|
|
$
|
474.9
|
|
|
$
|
658.0
|
|
|
$
|
439.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Plan transfer for the U.S.
represented a transfer from the Companys savings plan.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Pension settlements in 2010
represented settlement events in Canada, Belgium, Korea, Taiwan,
and France.
|
48 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
Plan
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
467.7
|
|
|
$
|
402.1
|
|
|
$
|
386.6
|
|
|
$
|
325.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
|
|
44.1
|
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
transfer(1)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Participant contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(37.8
|
)
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
(20.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Pension
settlements(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
540.0
|
|
|
$
|
426.6
|
|
|
$
|
467.7
|
|
|
$
|
402.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Plan transfer for the U.S.
represented a transfer from the Companys savings plan.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Pension settlements in 2010
represented settlement events in Canada, Belgium, Korea, Taiwan,
and France.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Adjustment in 2009 represented an
additional plan assets related to a German pension plan.
|
Funded
Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status of the plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(201.5
|
)
|
|
|
(115.2
|
)
|
|
|
(222.8
|
)
|
|
|
(107.0
|
)
|
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)
|
|
|
Plan assets less than benefit obligations
|
|
$
|
(204.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(225.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used for determining year end
obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.24
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.72
|
%
|
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
Rate of increase in future compensation levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount in non-current pension assets represents the net
assets of the Companys overfunded plans, which consist of
a few international plans. The amounts in current and
non-current pension liabilities represent the net obligation of
the Companys underfunded plans, which consist of all U.S.
and several international plans.
For U.S. and international plans combined, the projected
benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension
plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets were approximately $1.02 billion and
$693.3 million, respectively, at year end 2010 and
$952.2 million and $616.9 million, respectively, at
year end 2009.
For U.S. and international plans combined, the accumulated
benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension
plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets were approximately $1 billion and
$693.3 million, respectively, at year end 2010 and
$897.8 million and $609.5 million, respectively, at
year end 2009.
49
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (AOCI)
The pretax amounts recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
355.1
|
|
|
$
|
(.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
359.3
|
|
|
$
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
25.8
|
|
|
$
|
25.6
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)
|
|
|
(18.5
|
)
|
Net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in AOCI
|
|
$
|
357.3
|
|
|
$
|
107.3
|
|
|
$
|
364.0
|
|
|
$
|
81.7
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
The after-tax amounts and reconciliation of AOCI components as
of January 1, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
|
Before-Tax
|
|
|
Before-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-of-Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-of-Tax
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI at January 2, 2010
|
|
$
|
364.0
|
|
|
$
|
81.7
|
|
|
$
|
(146.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
299.0
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
Less: Amortization
|
|
|
(23.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)
|
|
|
.4
|
|
|
|
(.2
|
)
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Net AOCI
|
|
|
340.6
|
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
(137.0
|
)
|
|
|
280.6
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
(1)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
(.7
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
(.3
|
)
|
|
|
.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI at January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
357.3
|
|
|
$
|
107.3
|
|
|
$
|
(149.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
315.5
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Net of foreign currency translation
gain of $2.1.
|
Plan Income
Statement Reconciliations
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic
benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
23.8
|
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(48.4
|
)
|
|
|
(25.9
|
)
|
|
|
(48.6
|
)
|
|
|
(26.8
|
)
|
|
|
(50.9
|
)
|
|
|
(29.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Amortization of transition obligation (asset)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized loss (gain) on curtailment
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
(.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized loss on settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
(1)
|
|
|
.9
|
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
20.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represented settlement events in
Canada, Belgium, and Korea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used for determining net
periodic cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%(1)
|
|
|
5.72
|
%
|
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
|
6.55
|
%
|
|
|
5.53
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.75
|
|
|
|
6.23
|
|
|
|
8.75
|
|
|
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
8.75
|
|
|
|
6.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of increase in future compensation levels
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The ADPP and BRP were remeasured on
August 1, 2010 at 5.40% to reflect the plan freezes
effective December 31, 2010.
|
Plan
Contributions
In 2011, the Company expects to contribute approximately
$8 million and may contribute up to an additional
$25 million to its U.S. pension plans, and expects to
contribute $21 million to its international pension plans
(totaling approximately $50 million). The Company also expects
to contribute approximately $3 million to its
postretirement benefit plan in 2011.
50 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
Future Benefit
Payments
Benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
$
|
18.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
2012
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
2013
|
|
|
43.1
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
2014
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
2015
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
2016 2020
|
|
|
259.6
|
|
|
|
143.2
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Amortization Amounts in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income
The Companys estimates of fiscal year 2011 amortization of
amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
.4
|
|
|
|
.4
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Net transition obligation (asset)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount to be recognized
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
(.2
|
)
|
|
|
Defined
Contribution Plans
The Company sponsors various defined contribution plans
worldwide, with the largest plan being the Avery Dennison
Corporation Savings Plan (Savings Plan), a 401(k)
plan covering its U.S. employees. Employees hired after
December 31, 2008, who were no longer eligible to
participate in the Companys defined benefit pension plans
and early retiree medical plan, received an enhanced Company
matching contribution in the Savings Plan through
December 31, 2010. Effective January 1, 2011, the
Company increased and made uniform its matching contribution for
all participants in the Savings Plan in connection with the
freeze of the ADPP and BRP on December 31, 2010.
Beginning March 2009, the Companys match to the Savings
Plan was funded by shares in the Companys ESBT. During
2010 and 2009, the Company expensed $11.8 million and
$9.2 million, respectively, related to its match of
participant contributions in the Companys defined
contribution plan. This amount was recorded in Marketing,
general and administrative expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. See Note 9,
Shareholders Equity and Stock-based
Compensation, for more information.
Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (ESOP)
The Savings Plan has a leveraged ESOP feature, which allows the
plan to borrow funds to purchase shares of the Companys
common stock at market prices. Savings Plan expense consisted
primarily of stock contributions from the ESOP to participant
accounts. As of March 2009, the shares in the ESOP were fully
allocated to participants, and in August 2009, the final payment
of the principal and interest on the outstanding loan was made.
ESOP expense was accounted for under the cost of shares
allocated method. Net ESOP expense for 2009 and 2008 was
$1.2 million and $1 million, respectively. Company
contributions to pay interest or principal on ESOP borrowings
were $2.2 million and $3.7 million in 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
In 2009, interest costs incurred by the ESOP and dividends on
unallocated ESOP shares used for debt service were not
significant. In 2008, interest costs incurred by the ESOP were
$.3 million and dividends on unallocated ESOP shares used
for debt service were $.4 million.
The cost of shares allocated to the ESOP for 2009 and 2008 was
$1.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Of the
total shares held by the ESOP at year end 2008, .8 million
shares were allocated and .1 million shares were
unallocated.
Other Retirement
Plans
The Company has deferred compensation plans which permit
eligible employees and directors to defer a portion of their
compensation. The deferred compensation, together with certain
Company contributions, earns specified and variable rates of
return. As of year end 2010 and 2009, the Company had accrued
$135.3 million and $128.4 million, respectively, for
its obligations under these plans. These obligations are funded
by corporate-owned life insurance contracts and standby letters
of credit. As of year end 2010 and 2009, these obligations were
secured by standby letters of credit of $16 million and
$28 million, respectively. To assist in the funding of
these plans, the Company has purchased corporate-owned life
insurance contracts. Proceeds from the insurance policies are
payable to the Company upon the death of covered participants.
The cash surrender value of these policies, net of outstanding
loans, included in Other assets in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet, was $181.7 million and $170 million at
year end 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Companys deferred compensation expense was
$5.2 million, $7 million, and $9.5 million for
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. A portion of the interest on
certain Company contributions may be forfeited by participants
if employment is terminated before age 55 other than by
reason of death, disability or retirement.
Minimum annual rental commitments on operating leases having
initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms of one year or
more are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
66.1
|
|
2012
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
2013
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
2014
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
2015
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
244.2
|
|
|
|
Operating leases relate primarily to office and warehouse space,
and equipment for electronic data processing and transportation.
The terms of these leases do not impose significant restrictions
or unusual obligations, except as noted below. There were no
significant capital lease obligations at year end 2010 and 2009.
On September 9, 2005, the Company completed the lease
financing for a commercial facility (the Facility)
located in Mentor, Ohio, used primarily for the new headquarters
and research center for the Companys roll materials group.
The Facility consists generally of land, buildings,
51
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
equipment and office furnishings. The Company has leased the
Facility under an operating lease arrangement, which contains a
residual value guarantee of $33.4 million.
Rent expense for operating leases, which includes maintenance
and insurance costs and property taxes, was approximately
$99 million in 2010, $100 million in 2009, and
$105 million in 2008.
Legal
Proceedings
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior
Court for the County of Los Angeles, California, a purported
class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock
against the Company, UPM-Kymenne Corporation (UPM)
and UPMs subsidiary Raflatac (Raflatac),
seeking treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful
competitive practices, with allegations including that the
defendants attempted to limit competition among themselves
through anticompetitive understandings. Three similar complaints
were filed in various California courts. In November 2003, on
petition from the parties, the California Judicial Council
ordered the cases be coordinated for pretrial purposes. The
cases were assigned to a coordination trial judge in the
Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco on
March 30, 2004. On September 30, 2004, the Harman
Press amended its complaint to add Bemis Company Inc.s
subsidiary Morgan Adhesives Company (MACtac) as a
defendant. On January 21, 2005, American International
Distribution Corporation filed a purported class action on
behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court for
Chittenden County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by
Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court
of Johnson County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on
February 16, 2005 in the District Court of Scotts Bluff
County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a
purported multi-state class action on behalf of indirect
purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke County, Tennessee.
Without admitting liability, the Company agreed to pay
plaintiffs $2 million to resolve all claims related to the
purported state class actions in the states of Kansas, Nebraska,
Tennessee and Vermont. Those settlements were approved by the
Tennessee court on March 12, 2010 and the complaints in
those state actions were dismissed with prejudice. The Company
recorded $2 million in the third quarter of 2009 in respect
of the settlement of those claims, and made that payment on
December 28, 2009. Also, without admitting liability, the
Company paid $2.5 million on July 15, 2010 to resolve
all claims in the California action. On December 8, 2010,
the California court granted final approval of the settlement
and dismissed all claims against the Company with prejudice. In
respect of settlement of this claim, the Company recorded
$.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 and
$.3 million and $1.5 million in the first and second
quarters of 2010, respectively.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other
lawsuits, claims, inquiries, and other regulatory and compliance
matters, most of which are routine to the nature of the
Companys business. Based upon current information,
management believes that the impact of the resolution of these
other matters is not material to the Companys financial
position, or is not estimable.
Environmental
Matters
As of January 1, 2011, the Company has been designated by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party
(PRP) at fourteen waste disposal or waste recycling
sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil
and/or
groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of the
Companys liability has been agreed. The Company is
participating with other PRPs at such sites and anticipates that
its share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to
remediation agreements entered into in the normal course of
negotiations with the EPA or other governmental authorities.
The Company has accrued liabilities for these and certain other
sites where it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the
cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However,
because of the uncertainties associated with environmental
assessment and remediation activities, future expense to
remediate the currently identified sites and any sites that
could be identified in the future for cleanup could be higher
than the liabilities accrued.
The activity in 2010 and 2009 related to environmental
liabilities was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
51.5
|
|
|
$
|
54.6
|
|
Purchase price adjustments related to acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
46.3
|
|
|
$
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2011, approximately $9 million of the
total balance was classified as short-term.
These estimates could change depending on various factors, such
as modification of currently planned remedial actions, changes
in remediation technologies, changes in site conditions, changes
in the estimated time to complete remediation projects, changes
in laws and regulations affecting remediation requirements and
other factors.
Other
The Company participates in international receivable financing
programs with several financial institutions whereby advances
may be requested from these financial institutions. Such
advances are guaranteed by the Company. At January 1, 2011,
the Company had guaranteed approximately $14 million.
As of January 1, 2011, the Company guaranteed up to
approximately $17 million of certain foreign
subsidiaries credit granted by suppliers, and
$393 million of certain subsidiaries lines of credit
with various financial institutions.
NOTE 9. SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Common Stock and
Common Stock Repurchase Program
The Companys Certificate of Incorporation authorizes five
million shares of $1 par value preferred stock (none
outstanding), with respect to which the Board of Directors may
fix the series and terms of issuance, and 400 million
shares of $1 par value voting common stock.
In 1996, the Company established the ESBT to help meet the
Companys future obligations under employee benefit and
compensation plans, including stock plans, 401(k) plans, and
other employee benefit plans by contributing common stock of the
Company. The Board of Directors previously authorized the
issuance of up to 18 million shares to be used for the
52 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
issuance of stock options and the funding of other Company
obligations arising from various employee benefit plans. During
2010 and 2009, approximately 4.3 million and
.7 million ESBT shares (with fair values of
$163 million and $25 million, respectively) were
released by the ESBT upon the settlement of the Companys
employee benefit obligations. These released shares were
included as Treasury stock at cost in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of January 1, 2011,
approximately 2 million shares remaining available for
issuance are held in the ESBT. The ESBT common stock is carried
at market value with changes in share price from prior reporting
periods reflected as an adjustment to capital in excess of par
value.
The Board of Directors authorizes the Company to repurchase
shares of the Companys outstanding common stock.
Repurchased shares may be reissued under the Companys
stock option and incentive plans or used for other corporate
purposes. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company
repurchased approximately 2.7 million shares totaling
$108.7 million. Additionally, in December 2010, the Company
executed the repurchase of approximately .3 million shares
for $13.5 million, which settled in January 2011. As of
January 1, 2011, approximately 1.2 million shares were available
for repurchase under the Board of Directors October 2006
authorization.
Subsequent to the end of 2010, on January 27, 2011, the
Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase an
additional 5 million shares of the Companys stock.
Stock Based
Compensation
The Company maintains various stock option and incentive plans.
Net income for 2010, 2009 and 2008 included pretax stock-based
compensation expense, which related to stock options,
performance units (PUs), restricted stock units
(RSUs) and restricted stock, of $35.2 million,
$25.8 million and $29 million, respectively. These expenses
were included in Marketing, general and administrative
expense and were recorded in corporate expense and the
Companys operating segments, as appropriate. The total
recognized tax benefit related to these stock-based compensation
expenses for 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $11.9 million,
$8.5 million and $9.7 million, respectively. No
stock-based compensation cost was capitalized for the years
ended 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Stock
Options
Stock options granted to directors and employees may be granted
at no less than 100% of the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on the date of the grant. Options
generally vest ratably over a three-year period for directors
and over a four-year period for employees. Prior to fiscal year
2010, options granted to directors generally vested ratably over
a two-year period. Unexercised options expire ten years from the
date of grant. All stock options granted under these plans have
an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant.
The Companys stock-based compensation expense related to
stock options is the estimated fair value of options granted,
amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period. The fair value of the Companys stock option awards
is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. This model requires input assumptions for
the Companys expected dividend yield, expected stock price
volatility, risk-free interest rate and the expected option
term. The following describes the assumptions used in estimating
fair value of granted stock options.
Risk-free interest rate was based on the 52-week average
of the Treasury-Bond rate that has a term corresponding to the
expected option term.
Expected stock price volatility for options represents an
average of the implied and historical volatility.
Expected dividend yield was based on the current annual
dividend divided by the
12-month
average of the Companys monthly stock price prior to grant.
Expected option term was determined based on historical
experience under the Companys stock option plan.
Forfeiture rate of 5% was determined based on historical
data of the Companys stock option forfeitures.
The weighted-average fair value per share of options granted
during 2010 was $8.76, compared to $6.57 for the year ended 2009
and $13.82 for the year ended 2008.
The underlying weighted-average assumptions used were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
|
2.76
|
%
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
31.99
|
%
|
|
|
41.51
|
%
|
|
|
29.86
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
|
|
3.83
|
%
|
|
|
2.76
|
%
|
Expected option term
|
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
|
|
6.1 years
|
|
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth stock option information related
to the Companys stock option plans during 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of options
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
intrinsic value
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life (in years)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 2, 2010
|
|
|
10,760.2
|
|
|
$
|
49.72
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
$
|
34.0
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,850.8
|
|
|
|
33.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(121.2
|
)
|
|
|
21.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(921.4
|
)
|
|
|
53.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
11,568.4
|
|
|
$
|
47.06
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
11,441.9
|
|
|
|
47.25
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
Options exercisable at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
8,298.1
|
|
|
$
|
52.70
|
|
|
|
4.69
|
|
|
$
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
53
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was
$1.9 million in 2010, $.2 million in 2009 and
$1.9 million in 2008. Cash received by the Company from the
exercise of these stock options was approximately
$2.5 million in 2010, $.6 million in 2009 and
$3 million in 2008. The tax deduction associated with these
options exercised was $.6 million in 2010, $.1 million
in 2009 and $.6 million in 2008. The intrinsic value of the
stock options is based on the amount by which the market value
of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
In April and February 2010, the Company granted its annual
stock-based compensation awards to its directors and certain of
its eligible employees, respectively. Awards granted to
retirement-eligible employees are treated as though they were
immediately vested; as a result, the compensation expense
related to stock option awards of $2.5 million,
$.5 million and $3 million was recognized during 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively, and was included in the stock
option expense noted below.
Net income for 2010, 2009 and 2008 included pretax expense for
stock options of $19.4 million, $17 million and
$18.6 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the Companys unvested stock
options during 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
of options
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested options outstanding at January 2, 2010
|
|
|
3,566.3
|
|
|
$
|
36.01
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,850.8
|
|
|
|
33.09
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(2,006.8
|
)
|
|
|
38.59
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(140.0
|
)
|
|
|
36.32
|
|
|
|
Unvested options outstanding at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
3,270.3
|
|
|
$
|
32.76
|
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2011, the Company had approximately
$20 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested stock option awards granted under the Companys
plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over the
weighted-average remaining requisite service period of
approximately 3 years.
Performance
Units
Since the second quarter of 2008, following the shareholder
approval of the Companys amended and restated stock option
and incentive plan on April 24, 2008, the Company has
granted PUs to certain eligible employees of the Company. These
PUs are payable in shares of the Companys common stock at
the end of a three-year cliff vesting period provided that
certain performance metrics are achieved at the end of each
respective performance period. Over the performance period, the
number of the Companys common stock issued will be
adjusted upward or downward based upon the probability of
achievement of performance metrics. The actual number of shares
issued can range from 0% to 200% of the target shares at the
time of grant.
The pretax compensation expense related to PUs was
$7.7 million, $3.1 million and $1.2 million for
the years ended 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The tax
deduction associated with the vesting of PUs and the related
issuance of common stock was $.2 million in 2010 and
$.2 million in 2009.
The following table summarizes information about awarded PUs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
PUs
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at January 2, 2010
|
|
|
651.2
|
|
|
$
|
22.12
|
|
Granted at target
|
|
|
342.5
|
|
|
|
29.06
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)
|
|
|
28.66
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(60.5
|
)
|
|
|
23.45
|
|
|
|
Unvested at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
918.1
|
|
|
$
|
24.52
|
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2011, the Company had approximately
$12 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
these PUs, which reflects the Companys current expectation
of meeting certain performance metrics. This cost is expected to
be recognized over the weighted-average remaining requisite
service period of approximately 2 years.
Restricted Stock
Units and Restricted Stock
RSUs are granted under the Companys stock option and
incentive plan and vest based on one of the following:
|
|
|
|
o
|
A vesting period of 1 to 5 years provided that employment
continues for 1 to 5 years after the date of the
award; or
|
|
o
|
A vesting period of 3 years provided that a certain
performance objective is met at the end of the third year after
the year of the award. If the performance objective is not
achieved at the end of the third year, these same RSUs may vest
if the performance objective is met at the end of the fourth
year, and if not achieved at that time, then these same RSUs may
vest if the performance objective is met at the end of the fifth
year following the year of grant.
|
For both groups, if the above vesting conditions are not met,
the RSUs will be forfeited.
Certain RSUs granted from 2005 through 2008 include dividend
equivalents in the form of additional RSUs, which are equivalent
to the amount of the dividend paid or property distributed on a
single share of common stock multiplied by the number of RSUs in
the employees account. Starting in fiscal year 2008, the
Company began granting RSUs without dividend equivalents.
The following table summarizes information about awarded RSUs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at January 2, 2010
|
|
|
783.3
|
|
|
$
|
32.24
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
598.4
|
|
|
|
30.01
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(197.8
|
)
|
|
|
39.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(56.0
|
)
|
|
|
29.76
|
|
|
|
Unvested at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
1,127.9
|
|
|
$
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
54 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
The total compensation expense related to RSUs and restricted
stock is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period.
The pretax compensation expense related to RSUs was
$8 million, $5.5 million and $7.8 million for the
years ended 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The tax deduction
associated with the vesting of RSUs and the related issuance of
common stock was approximately $2.2 million in 2010,
$1.3 million in 2009 and $.8 million in 2008.
The pretax compensation expense related to Paxar converted
performance share awards was $.1 million in 2009 and
$1.1 million in 2008. The tax deduction associated with the
vesting of performance shares and the related issuance of common
stock was $.4 million in 2009 and $.2 million in 2008.
During 2005, the Company also awarded 30,000 shares of
restricted stock, which vests in two equal increments, the first
vested in 2009 and the second will vest in 2012. Pretax
compensation expense for this award was $.1 million in
2010, $.1 million in 2009 and $.3 million in 2008.
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation awards granted
to retirement-eligible employees as though they were immediately
vested; as a result, the pretax compensation expense related to
RSUs granted to retirement-eligible employees was recognized and
included in the compensation expense noted above.
As of January 1, 2011, the Company had approximately
$19 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested RSUs and restricted stock. This cost is expected to be
recognized over the remaining requisite service period
(weighted-average remaining service period of approximately
2 years for RSUs and restricted stock).
NOTE 10.
COST REDUCTION ACTIONS
Severance charges recorded under the restructuring actions below
are included in Other accrued liabilities in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Severance and related costs
represent cash paid or to be paid to employees terminated under
these actions. Asset impairments are based on the estimated
market value of the assets. Charges below are included in
Other expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
2010
In 2010, the Company continued its cost reduction program
initiated in late 2008 and implemented additional restructuring
actions resulting in a reduction of approximately 1,040
positions, impairment of certain assets, and lease
cancellations. At January 1, 2011, approximately
500 employees impacted by these actions remain with the
Company, and are expected to leave in 2011. Pretax charges
related to these actions totaled $19 million, including
severance and related costs of $15.3 million, impairment of
fixed assets, buildings, and land of $2.6 million, and
lease cancellation charges of $1.1 million. The table below
details the accruals and payments related to these actions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive
|
|
|
Information
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
converting
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Total severance and related costs accrued during the period
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
.7
|
|
|
$
|
.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
July 3, 2010
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
January 1, 2011
|
|
|
.9
|
|
|
|
(.4
|
)
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
Total expense accrued during 2010
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
2010 Settlements
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
(.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
.6
|
|
|
$
|
.8
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
.1
|
|
|
$
|
.5
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
.7
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Land
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease cancellations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
.9
|
|
|
$
|
.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
2009
In 2009, the Company continued its cost reduction program
initiated in late 2008, resulting in a reduction of
approximately 3,335 positions, impairment of certain assets, and
lease cancellations. At January 1, 2011, no employees
impacted by these actions remain with the Company. Pretax
charges related to
55
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
these actions totaled $129.1 million, including severance
and related costs of $86.8 million, impairment of fixed
assets, buildings, land and patents of $39.9 million, and
lease cancellation charges of $2.4 million. The table below
details the accruals and payments related to these actions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive
|
|
|
Information
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
converting
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Total severance and related costs accrued during the period
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 4, 2009
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
July 4, 2009
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
(.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
January 2, 2010
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
Total expense accrued during 2009
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
|
2009 Settlements
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
(23.6
|
)
|
|
|
(.3
|
)
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
|
(54.4
|
)
|
2010 Settlements
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(30.7
|
)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
.6
|
|
|
$
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
.6
|
|
|
$
|
.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
.7
|
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
$
|
28.0
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
.7
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Land
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease cancellations
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
|
$
|
42.3
|
|
|
|
2008
In 2008, the Company implemented cost reduction actions,
including the new program initiated in the fourth quarter,
resulting in a reduction of approximately 1,475 positions,
impairment of certain assets and software, as well as lease
cancellations. At January 1, 2011, no employees impacted by
these actions remain with the Company. Pretax charges related to
these actions totaled $40.7 million, including severance
and related costs of $29.8 million, impairment of fixed
assets and buildings of $7.7 million, lease cancellation
charges of $2.3 million and software impairment of
$.9 million. The table below details the accruals and
payments related to these actions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive
|
|
|
Information
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
converting
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Total severance and related costs accrued during the period
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
June 28, 2008
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
September 27, 2008
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
December 27, 2008
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
Total expense accrued during 2008
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
2008 Settlements
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
2009 Settlements
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(16.2
|
)
|
2010 Settlements
|
|
|
(.2
|
)
|
|
|
(.1
|
)
|
|
|
(.7
|
)
|
|
|
(.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1
|
|
Software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease cancellations
|
|
|
.9
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
56 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
NOTE 11.
TAXES BASED ON INCOME
Taxes based on income (loss) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal tax
|
|
$
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
State taxes
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
International taxes
|
|
|
97.9
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
126.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.4
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
134.9
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal tax
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)
|
State taxes
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
International taxes
|
|
|
(38.6
|
)
|
|
|
(35.2
|
)
|
|
|
(96.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48.0
|
)
|
|
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|
|
(130.4
|
)
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
$
|
34.4
|
|
|
$
|
(44.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
The principal items accounting for the difference in taxes as
computed at the U.S. statutory rate, and as recorded, were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Computed tax at 35% of income (loss) before taxes
|
|
$
|
123.0
|
|
|
$
|
(276.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
94.7
|
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Foreign earnings taxed at different rates
|
|
|
(63.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(62.2
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
(45.3
|
)
|
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation assets
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
(30.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal tax credits (R&D and low-income housing)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
Tax contingencies and audit settlements
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
Other items, net
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
$
|
34.4
|
|
|
$
|
(44.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income (loss) before taxes for U.S. and
international operations was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
$
|
(412.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14.2
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
324.3
|
|
|
|
(378.3
|
)
|
|
|
284.8
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
$
|
351.3
|
|
|
$
|
(790.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
270.6
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate was approximately 10% for the full year
2010 compared to approximately 6% for the full year 2009. The
2010 effective tax rate reflects $45.5 million of benefit
from net operating losses resulting from the local statutory
write down of certain investments in Europe and
$17.7 million of net benefit from releases and accruals of
certain tax reserves. The 2009 effective tax rate was most
significantly influenced by the non-cash goodwill and intangible
asset impairment charges, as these expenses are largely not tax
deductible, thereby reducing the tax benefit from the loss.
Income taxes have not been provided on certain undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries of $1.20 billion and
$1.23 billion at years ended 2010 and 2009, respectively,
because such earnings are considered to be indefinitely
reinvested. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax
that would be payable upon distribution of these earnings.
Deferred taxes have been accrued for earnings that are not
considered indefinitely reinvested. The repatriation accrual for
2010 and 2009 was $15.3 million and $21.7 million,
respectively.
Deferred income taxes reflect the temporary differences between
the amounts at which assets and liabilities are recorded for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts utilized for tax
purposes. The primary components of the temporary differences
that gave rise to the Companys deferred tax assets and
liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses not currently deductible
|
|
$
|
69.7
|
|
|
$
|
65.8
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
|
348.5
|
|
|
|
214.7
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
111.4
|
|
|
|
101.8
|
|
Capital loss carryforward
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Postretirement and postemployment benefits
|
|
|
108.6
|
|
|
|
94.8
|
|
Pension costs
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
107.3
|
|
Inventory reserves
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(115.6
|
)
|
|
|
(115.4
|
)
|
|
|
Total deferred tax
assets(1)
|
|
|
659.4
|
|
|
|
496.1
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(188.1
|
)
|
|
|
(184.3
|
)
|
Repatriation accrual
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
Foreign operating loss recapture
|
|
|
(122.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
Total deferred tax
liabilities(1)
|
|
|
(332.0
|
)
|
|
|
(219.0
|
)
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax assets from operations
|
|
$
|
327.4
|
|
|
$
|
277.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects gross amount before
jurisdictional netting of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
|
A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets
to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. When
establishing a valuation allowance, the Company considers future
sources of taxable income such as future reversals of
existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income
exclusive of reversing temporary differences and
carryforwards and tax planning strategies.
Net operating loss carryforwards of foreign subsidiaries for
2010 and 2009 were $1.14 billion and $709.6 million,
respectively. The increase in 2010 is largely due to certain
foreign statutory investment impairments. If unused, foreign net
operating losses of $41.7 million will expire between 2011
and 2014, and $78.7 million will expire after 2014. Net
operating losses of $1.02 billion can be carried forward
indefinitely. Based on current projections, certain indefinite
lived foreign net operating losses may take approximately
50 years to be fully utilized. Tax credit carryforwards of
both domestic and foreign subsidiaries for 2010 and 2009 totaled
$111.4 million and $101.8 million, respectively. If
unused, tax credit carryforwards of $2.6 million will
expire between 2011 and 2013, $54.3 million will expire
between 2014 and 2018, and $47.5 million will expire after
2018. Tax credit carryforwards of $7 million can be carried
forward indefinitely. The Company has established a valuation
allowance for the net operating loss
57
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
and credit carryforwards not expected to be utilized. The
valuation allowance for 2010 and 2009 is $115.6 million and
$115.4 million, respectively.
The Company has been granted tax holidays in several
jurisdictions including Bangladesh, China, Thailand and Vietnam.
The tax holidays expire between 2011 and 2016. These tax
holidays benefit the Companys consolidated effective tax
rate on operations by less than 2%.
Tax Benefit
Reserve
On January 1, 2011, the Companys unrecognized tax
benefits totaled $154.2 million, including
$102.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits which, if
recognized, would reduce the annual effective income tax rate.
As of January 2, 2010, the Companys unrecognized tax
benefits totaled $182.0 million, including
$121.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits which, if
recognized, would reduce the annual effective income tax rate.
Where applicable, the Company recognizes potential accrued
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits from
its global operations in income tax expense. The Company
recognized a benefit of $2.6 million of interest and
penalties in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in 2010
and an expense of $1.1 million and $7.6 million of
interest and penalties in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company has
accrued for $20.9 million and $23.4 million of
interest and penalties in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in
2010 and 2009, respectively.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
151.7
|
|
|
$
|
142.9
|
|
Acquired balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
Additions for tax position of prior years
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in judgment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Lapses of applicable statute
|
|
|
(36.7
|
)
|
|
|
(41.9
|
)
|
Changes due to translation of foreign currencies
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year (excluding interest and penalties)
|
|
|
127.2
|
|
|
|
151.7
|
|
Interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year (including interest and penalties)
|
|
$
|
154.2
|
|
|
$
|
182.0
|
|
|
|
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to
ongoing audits by taxing jurisdictions around the world. The
Companys estimate of the potential outcome of any
uncertain tax issue is subject to managements assessment
of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that
time. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for
reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to these matters.
However, the Companys future results may include favorable
or unfavorable adjustments to its estimated tax liabilities in
the period the assessments are made or resolved, which may
impact the Companys effective tax rate. With some
exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer
subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years
prior to 2005.
It is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months,
the Company may realize a decrease in its gross uncertain tax
positions by approximately $32 million, primarily as the
result of cash payments and closing tax years. The Company
anticipates that it is reasonably possible that cash payments of
up to $14 million relating to gross uncertain tax positions
could be paid within the next 12 months.
NOTE 12.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The accounting policies of the segments are described in
Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies. Intersegment sales are recorded at or near
market prices and are eliminated in determining consolidated
sales. The Company evaluates performance based on income from
operations before interest expense and taxes. General corporate
expenses are also excluded from the computation of income from
operations for the segments.
The Company does not disclose total assets by reportable segment
since the Company does not produce and review such information
internally. The Company does not disclose revenues from external
customers for each product because it is impracticable to do so.
As the Companys reporting structure is not organized by
country, results by individual country are not provided because
it is impracticable to do so.
Financial information by reportable segment and other businesses
from operations is set forth below. Prior year amounts have been
restated to reflect the transfer of a business from Retail
Information Services to other specialty converting businesses to
align with a change in the Companys internal reporting
structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to unaffiliated customers:
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials
|
|
$
|
3,639.8
|
|
|
$
|
3,300.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,643.8
|
|
Retail Information Services
|
|
|
1,521.7
|
|
|
|
1,320.9
|
|
|
|
1,547.2
|
|
Office and Consumer Products
|
|
|
815.2
|
|
|
|
849.3
|
|
|
|
935.8
|
|
Other specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
536.0
|
|
|
|
482.5
|
|
|
|
583.6
|
|
|
|
Net sales to unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
6,512.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,952.7
|
|
|
$
|
6,710.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials
|
|
$
|
157.0
|
|
|
$
|
147.1
|
|
|
$
|
172.5
|
|
Retail Information Services
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Office and Consumer Products
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
.7
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Other specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(190.5
|
)
|
|
|
(165.2
|
)
|
|
|
(202.1
|
)
|
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials
|
|
$
|
317.8
|
|
|
$
|
184.7
|
|
|
$
|
257.2
|
|
Retail Information Services
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
(899.0
|
)
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
Office and Consumer Products
|
|
|
91.5
|
|
|
|
118.1
|
|
|
|
145.7
|
|
Other specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
(44.1
|
)
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Corporate expense
|
|
|
(51.2
|
)
|
|
|
(65.3
|
)
|
|
|
(35.1
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(76.6
|
)
|
|
|
(85.3
|
)
|
|
|
(115.9
|
)
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
$
|
351.3
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
(790.9
|
)(2)
|
|
$
|
270.6
|
(3)
|
|
|
58 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials
|
|
$
|
50.2
|
|
|
$
|
41.5
|
|
|
$
|
50.1
|
|
Retail Information Services
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
Office and Consumer Products
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Other specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures(4)
|
|
$
|
107.3
|
|
|
$
|
75.6
|
|
|
$
|
119.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials
|
|
$
|
77.8
|
|
|
$
|
86.2
|
|
|
$
|
91.7
|
|
Retail Information Services
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
Office and Consumer Products
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
Other specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
$
|
172.9
|
|
|
$
|
187.6
|
|
|
$
|
204.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Results for 2010 included
Other expense, net totaling $27.7, consisting of
restructuring costs, asset impairment charges and lease
cancellation costs of $19, loss from curtailment and settlement
of pension obligations of $4.3, loss from debt extinguishments
of $4, net legal settlement costs of $.9, partially offset by a
gain on a sale of investment of $(.5). Of the total $27.7, the
Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $6.9, the Retail
Information Services segment recorded $5.8, the Office and
Consumer Products segment recorded $8.4, the other specialty
converting businesses recorded $3.1, and Corporate recorded $3.5.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Results for 2009 included
Other expense, net totaling $191.3, consisting of
restructuring costs, asset impairment charges and lease
cancellation costs of $129.1, legal settlements of $41, and a
loss from debt extinguishment of $21.2. Of the total $191.3, the
Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $75.3, the Retail
Information Services segment recorded $51.6, the Office and
Consumer Products segment recorded $14, the other specialty
converting businesses recorded $29.2 and Corporate recorded
$21.2.
|
|
|
|
Additionally, 2009 operating loss
for the Retail Information Services segment included goodwill
and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $832
taken in the first quarter of 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Results for 2008 included
Other expense, net totaling $36.2, consisting of
restructuring costs, asset impairment charges and lease
cancellation costs of $40.7, partially offset by a gain on sale
of investments of $(4.5). Of the total $36.2, the
Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $12.6, the Retail
Information Services segment recorded $12.2, the Office and
Consumer Products segment recorded $12.7, the other specialty
converting businesses recorded $3.2 and Corporate recorded
$(4.5).
|
|
|
|
Additionally, 2008 operating income
for the Retail Information Services segment included transition
costs associated with the Paxar and DM Label acquisitions of
$24.1.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Included capital expenditures
accrued but not paid of $12.4 in 2010, $8.2 in 2009 and $4.7 in
2008. Capital expenditures refer to purchases of property, plant
and equipment.
|
Financial information relating to the Companys operations
by geographic area is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to unaffiliated customers:
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
2,111.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,026.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,218.4
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
2,019.5
|
|
|
|
1,949.4
|
|
|
|
2,366.6
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
1,513.3
|
|
|
|
1,236.8
|
|
|
|
1,297.6
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
484.3
|
|
|
|
394.2
|
|
|
|
448.0
|
|
Other international
|
|
|
384.1
|
|
|
|
345.9
|
|
|
|
379.8
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,512.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,952.7
|
|
|
$
|
6,710.4
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net:
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
488.4
|
|
|
$
|
509.3
|
|
|
$
|
604.2
|
|
International
|
|
|
774.5
|
|
|
|
845.4
|
|
|
|
888.8
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,262.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,354.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,493.0
|
|
|
|
Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the
location to which the product is shipped. Export sales from the
United States to unaffiliated customers are not a material
factor in the Companys business.
|
|
NOTE 13.
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
Quarter(1)
|
|
|
Quarter(2)
|
|
|
Quarter(3)
|
|
|
Quarter(4)
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,554.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,680.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,640.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,637.1
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
440.8
|
|
|
|
490.4
|
|
|
|
453.0
|
|
|
|
441.8
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
|
|
83.8
|
|
|
|
64.2
|
|
|
|
114.2
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
|
.52
|
|
|
|
.79
|
|
|
|
.61
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution
|
|
|
.51
|
|
|
|
.78
|
|
|
|
.60
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,426.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,455.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,549.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,521.8
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
345.1
|
|
|
|
390.3
|
|
|
|
436.0
|
|
|
|
415.1
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(898.9
|
)
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
(8.99
|
)
|
|
|
.38
|
|
|
|
.59
|
|
|
|
.47
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution
|
|
|
(8.99
|
)
|
|
|
.38
|
|
|
|
.59
|
|
|
|
.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Results in the first quarter of
2010 included pretax Other expense, net totaling
$6.3, consisting of restructuring costs of $4.7, asset
impairment charges of $.2, and an accrual for legal settlements
of $1.4.
|
|
|
|
Results in the first quarter of
2009 included pretax Other expense, net totaling
$97.3 consisting of asset impairment charges of $21.9,
restructuring costs of $17.1, lease cancellation charges of $.1,
an accrual for a legal settlement of $37, and a loss of $21.2
from debt extinguishment. Additionally, results included
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment
charges of $832.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Results in the second quarter of
2010 included pretax Other expense, net totaling
$4.6, consisting of restructuring costs of $1.9, asset
impairment charges of $.6, a loss from curtailment and
settlement of a foreign pension obligation of $1.9, and a loss
of $1.2 from debt extinguishment, partially offset by a gain on
sale of investment of $(.5) and net gain on legal settlements of
$(.5).
|
|
|
|
Results in the second quarter of
2009 included pretax Other expense, net totaling
$29.6 consisting of restructuring costs of $25.8 asset
impairment charges of $3.3, and lease cancellation charges of
$.5.
|
59
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(continued)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Results in the third quarter of
2010 included pretax Other expense, net totaling
$10.5, consisting of restructuring costs of $5.8, asset
impairment charges of $1.3 and lease cancellation costs of $1
and a loss from curtailment and settlement of domestic pension
obligations of $2.4.
|
|
|
|
Results in the third quarter of
2009 included pretax Other expense, net totaling
$35.5 consisting of restructuring costs of $27 and asset
impairment charges of $4.7, lease cancellation charges of $1.8,
and legal settlement charges of $2.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Results in the fourth quarter of
2010 included pretax Other expense, net totaling
$6.3 consisting of restructuring costs of $2.9, asset impairment
charges of $.4, and lease cancellation charges of $.2, and a
loss of $2.8 from debt extinguishment.
|
|
|
|
Results in the fourth quarter of
2009 included pretax Other expense, net totaling
$28.9 consisting of restructuring costs of $16.9, asset
impairment charges of $9.9, lease cancellation charges of $.1,
and legal settlement charges of $2. Additionally, results
included
out-of-period
adjustments related to deferred compensation assets of $4.9 and
a deferred tax asset of $1, which decreased net income by $5.9.
|
|
|
NOTE 14.
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
|
Recurring Fair
Value Measurements
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried
at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of
January 1, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
.1
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried
at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of
January 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities are measured at fair value using
quoted prices and classified within Level 1 of the
valuation hierarchy. Derivatives that are exchange-traded are
measured at fair value using quoted market prices and are
classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Derivatives measured based on inputs that are readily available
in public markets are classified within Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy.
Non-recurring
Fair Value Measurements
The following table summarizes the fair value measurements of
assets measured on a non-recurring basis during 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
Long-lived assets with carrying amounts totaling
$3.4 million were written down to their fair values of
$2.4 million, resulting in an impairment charge of
$1.0 million during 2010, which was included in Other
expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
60 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
The following table summarizes the fair value measurements of
assets measured on a non-recurring basis during 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
415.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
415.0
|
|
|
$
|
(820.0
|
)
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(20.3
|
)
|
|
|
Long-lived assets with carrying amounts totaling
$31.3 million were written down to their fair values
totaling $11 million, resulting in impairment charges of
$20.3 million during 2009. These charges were included in
Other expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Goodwill with a carrying amount of $1.21 billion was
written down to its estimated implied fair value of
$415 million, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of
$820 million in the first quarter of 2009. Additionally,
certain indefinite-lived assets with a carrying value of
approximately $30 million were written down to their
estimated implied fair value of $18 million, resulting in a
non-cash impairment charge of $12 million in the first
quarter of 2009. These charges were included in Goodwill
and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to
Note 3, Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from
Business Acquisitions, for further information.
61
STATEMENT OF
MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The consolidated financial statements and accompanying
information were prepared by and are the responsibility of
management. The statements were prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and, as such, include amounts that are based on
managements best estimates and judgments.
Oversight of managements financial reporting and internal
accounting control responsibilities is exercised by the Board of
Directors, through the Audit Committee, which is comprised
solely of independent directors. The Committee meets
periodically with financial management, internal auditors and
the independent registered public accounting firm to obtain
reasonable assurance that each is meeting its responsibilities
and to discuss matters concerning auditing, internal accounting
control and financial reporting. The independent registered
public accounting firm and the Companys internal audit
department have free access to meet with the Audit Committee
without managements presence.
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
Under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including the chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based
on the framework in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the
Companys evaluation under the framework in Internal
Control Integrated Framework, management has
concluded that internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of January 1, 2011. Managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of January 1, 2011 has been audited
by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included
herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dean A. Scarborough
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Mitchell R. Butier
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
|
62 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Avery Dennison
Corporation:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Avery Dennison
Corporation and its subsidiaries at January 1, 2011 and
January 2, 2010, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
January 1, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
January 1, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for these financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express opinions on these financial
statements and on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted
our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 25, 2011
63
Corporate
Information
Counsel
Latham & Watkins LLP
Los Angeles, California
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
Transfer
Agent Registrar
Computershare Trust Co., N.A.
P. O. Box 43078
Providence, Rhode Island
02940-3078
(877) 498-8861
(800) 952-9245
(TDD/TTY)
www.computershare.com/investor
Annual
Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at
1:30 p.m. on April 28, 2011 in the Conference Center
of the Avery Dennison Miller Corporate Center, 150 North Orange
Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, California.
The
DirectSERVICEtm
Investment
Program
Shareholders of record may reinvest their cash dividends in
additional shares of Avery Dennison common stock at market
price. Investors may also invest optional cash payments of up to
$12,500 per month in Avery Dennison common stock at market
price. Avery Dennison investors not yet participating in the
program, as well as brokers and custodians who hold Avery
Dennison common stock for clients, may obtain a copy of the
program by writing to The
DirectSERVICEtm
Investment Program,
c/o Computershare
Trust Co., Inc. (include a reference to Avery Dennison in
the correspondence), P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI
02940-3078,
calling
(877) 498-8861,
or logging onto their web site at
http://www.computershare.com/investor.
Direct Deposit of
Dividends
Avery Dennison shareholders may deposit quarterly dividend
checks directly into their checking or savings accounts. For
more information, call Avery Dennisons transfer agent and
registrar, Computershare Trust Co., Inc., at
(877) 498-8861.
Other
Information
The Company is including, as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), certificates of the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and the Company submitted to the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) the Companys annual
written affirmation on April 28, 2010, along with the Chief
Executive Officers certificate that he is not aware of any
violation by the Company of NYSEs corporate governance
listing standards.
A copy of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as filed with the SEC, will be furnished to shareholders and
interested investors free of charge upon written request to the
Secretary of the Company. Copies may also be obtained from the
Investors section of the Companys web site at
www.averydennison.com.
Corporate
Headquarters
Avery Dennison Corporation
Miller Corporate Center
150 North Orange Grove Boulevard
Pasadena, California 91103
Phone:
(626) 304-2000
Fax:
(626) 792-7312
Mailing
Address:
P.O. Box 7090
Pasadena, California
91109-7090
Stock and
Dividend Data
Common shares of Avery Dennison are listed on the NYSE.
Ticker symbol: AVY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
Price(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
40.07
|
|
|
$
|
30.79
|
|
|
$
|
33.61
|
|
|
$
|
17.26
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
41.39
|
|
|
|
31.32
|
|
|
|
29.76
|
|
|
|
23.94
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
38.04
|
|
|
|
31.67
|
|
|
|
36.56
|
|
|
|
24.23
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
42.49
|
|
|
|
35.80
|
|
|
|
40.02
|
|
|
|
34.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Prices shown represent closing
prices on the NYSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Dividends Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
.20
|
|
|
$
|
.41
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
.41
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
.20
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shareholders of record as of year end
|
|
|
7,610
|
|
|
|
8,180
|
|
|
|
64 Avery Dennison Corporation 2010 Annual Report
exv21
EXHIBIT 21
|
|
|
|
|
JURISDICTION OF |
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY |
|
ORGANIZATION |
ADC PHILIPPINES, INC.
|
|
PHILIPPINES |
ADESPAN S.R.L.
|
|
ITALY |
ADESPAN U.K. LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
ADHIPRESS BANGLADESH LTD.
|
|
BANGLADESH |
ADHIPRESS (HONG KONG) LTD.
|
|
HONG KONG |
ADVANCE FAR INVESTMENTS LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
ALKAHN HONG KONG LABELS LTD.
|
|
HONG KONG |
AMERICAN TRIM PRODUCTS (ASIA) LIMITED
|
|
HONG KONG |
ARTISTIC INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD.
|
|
HONG KONG |
ASTRIA S.R.L.
|
|
ITALY |
AVERY CORP.
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DE MEXICO SRL DE CV
|
|
MEXICO |
AVERY DENNISON HOLDINGS (MALTA) LIMITED
|
|
MALTA |
AVERY DENNISON AUSTRALIA GROUP HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED
|
|
AUSTRALIA |
AVERY DENNISON AUSTRALIA INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS PTY LTD.
|
|
AUSTRALIA |
AVERY DENNISON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD.
|
|
AUSTRALIA |
AVERY DENNISON BELGIE BVBA
|
|
BELGIUM |
AVERY DENNISON BENELUX BVBA
|
|
BELGIUM |
AVERY DENNISON BULGARIA EOOD
|
|
BULGARIA |
AVERY DENNISON BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON CANADA CORPORATION
|
|
CANADA |
AVERY DENNISON CENTRAL EUROPE GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON CHILE S.A.
|
|
CHILE |
AVERY DENNISON COLOMBIA S. A.
|
|
COLOMBIA |
AVERY DENNISON CONVERTED PRODUCTS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.
|
|
MEXICO |
AVERY DENNISON CONVERTED PRODUCTS EL SALVADOR S. A. DE C. V.
|
|
EL SALVADOR |
AVERY DENNISON COORDINATION CENTER BVBA
|
|
BELGIUM |
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON C.A.
|
|
VENEZUELA |
AVERY DENNISON DE ARGENTINA S.A.
|
|
ARGENTINA |
AVERY DENNISON DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON DO BRASIL LTDA.
|
|
BRAZIL |
AVERY DENNISON DOMINICAN REPUBLIC S. A.
|
|
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC |
AVERY DENNISON EGYPT LLC
|
|
EGYPT |
AVERY DENNISON ETIKET TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
|
|
TURKEY |
AVERY DENNISON EUROPE GMBH
|
|
SWITZERLAND |
AVERY DENNISON EUROPE HOLDING (DEUTSCHLAND) GMBH & CO KG
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE BELGIUM BVBA
|
|
BELGIUM |
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE GERMANY GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE LUXEMBOURG II SARL
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE LUXEMBOURG S. A. R. L.
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE LUXEMBOURG III SARL
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON FOUNDATION
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON FRANCE S.A.S.
|
|
FRANCE |
AVERY DENNISON G HOLDINGS I LLC
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON G HOLDINGS III LLC
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON G INVESTMENTS 111 LIMITED
|
|
GIBRALTAR |
AVERY DENNISON G INVESTMENTS V LIMITED
|
|
GIBRALTAR |
AVERY DENNISON GROUP DANMARK APS
|
|
DENMARK |
AVERY DENNISON GROUP SINGAPORE (PTE) LIMITED
|
|
SINGAPORE |
AVERY DENNISON GULF FZCO
|
|
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES |
|
|
|
|
|
JURISDICTION OF |
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY |
|
ORGANIZATION |
AVERY DENNISON HOLDING AG
|
|
SWITZERLAND |
AVERY DENNISON HOLDING GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON HOLDING LUXEMBOURG S. A. R. L.
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON HOLDING & FINANCE THE NETHERLANDS BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON HOLDINGS LLC
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON HOLDINGS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
|
|
NEW ZEALAND |
AVERY DENNISON HONG KONG BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON HUNGARY LIMITED
|
|
HUNGARY |
AVERY DENNISON IBERICA, S.A.
|
|
SPAIN |
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENT LUXEMBOURG II SARL
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENTS LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L.
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENTS LUXEMBOURG III SARL
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENTS LUXEMBOURG IV SARL
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENTS LUXEMBOURG V SCA
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON ITALIA S.R.L.
|
|
ITALY |
AVERY DENNISON JAPAN K.K.
|
|
JAPAN |
AVERY DENNISON KAGIT URUNLERI SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
|
|
TURKEY |
AVERY DENNISON KOREA LIMITED
|
|
SOUTH KOREA |
AVERY DENNISON LANKA (PRIVATE) LIMITED
|
|
SRI LANKA |
AVERY DENNISON LUXEMBOURG SALES SARL
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L.
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON MANAGEMENT GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON MANAGEMENT KGAA
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON MANAGEMENT S.A.R.L.
|
|
LUXEMBOURG |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS EUROPE B.V.
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS EUROPE GMBH
|
|
SWITZERLAND |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS FRANCE S.A.R.L.
|
|
FRANCE |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS IRELAND LIMITED
|
|
IRELAND |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS NEDERLAND BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
|
|
NEW ZEALAND |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS PTY LIMITED
|
|
AUSTRALIA |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS ROM SRL
|
|
ROMANIA |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS RUSSIA LLC
|
|
RUSSIA |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS SALES FRANCE S. A. S.
|
|
FRANCE |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS SALES GERMANY GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS SDN BHD
|
|
MALAYSIA |
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS U.K. LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
AVERY DENNISON MAURITIUS LTD.
|
|
MAURITIUS |
AVERY DENNISON MOROCCO SARL
|
|
MOROCCO |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT 0 BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT I BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT II B. V.
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT III BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT IX BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT NORTH AMERICA BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT VI BV
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT VII B.V.
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT VIII COOPERATIEF U.A.
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT X B V
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT XI COOPERATIEF U.A.
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON NORDIC APS
|
|
DENMARK |
AVERY DENNISON NORGE A/S
|
|
NORWAY |
AVERY DENNISON NTP A. S.
|
|
NORWAY |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE ACCESSORIES U.K. LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY
|
|
U.S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
JURISDICTION OF |
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY |
|
ORGANIZATION |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS DE MEXICO, S DE R.L. DE C.V.
|
|
MEXICO |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS FRANCE S. A. S.
|
|
FRANCE |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS HOLDINGS COMPANY
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS ITALIA S.R.L.
|
|
ITALY |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING U.K. LTD.
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS PTY LIMITED
|
|
AUSTRALIA |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS (NZ) LIMITED
|
|
NEW ZEALAND |
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS (PTY.) LTD.
|
|
SOUTH AFRICA |
AVERY DENNISON OVERSEAS CORPORATION
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON OVERSEAS CORPORATION (JAPAN BRANCH)
|
|
JAPAN |
AVERY DENNISON PENSION TRUSTEE LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
AVERY DENNISON PERU S. R. L.
|
|
PERU |
AVERY DENNISON POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
|
|
POLAND |
AVERY DENNISON PRAHA SPOL. S R. O.
|
|
CZECH REPUBLIC |
AVERY DENNISON REFLECTIVES DO BRAZIL LTDA.
|
|
BRAZIL |
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES COLOMBIA S. A.
|
|
COLOMBIA |
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES DE MEXICO, S. A. DE C.V.
|
|
MEXICO |
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, S. A.
|
|
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC |
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES EL SALVADOR S. A. DE C. V.
|
|
EL SALVADOR |
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES GUATEMALA, S. A.
|
|
GUATEMALA |
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES UK LTD.
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES (PTY) LTD
|
|
SOUTH AFRICA |
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES HONDURAS, S. R.L.
|
|
HONDURAS |
AVERY DENNISON RFID COMPANY
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON RIS KOREA LTD.
|
|
KOREA |
AVERY DENNISON RIS MALAYSIA SDN BHD.
|
|
MALAYSIA |
AVERY DENNISON RIS TAIWAN LTD.
|
|
TAIWAN |
AVERY DENNISON RIS VIETNAM CO. LTD.
|
|
VIETNAM |
AVERY DENNISON R.I.S. FRANCE S. A. S.
|
|
FRANCE |
AVERY DENNISON R.I.S. IBERIA S.L.
|
|
SPAIN |
AVERY DENNISON R.I.S. ITALIA S.R.L.
|
|
ITALY |
AVERY DENNISON R.I.S. POLSKA SP.ZO.O
|
|
POLAND |
AVERY DENNISON SCANDINAVIA AB
|
|
SWEDEN |
AVERY DENNISON SCANDINAVIA APS
|
|
DENMARK |
AVERY DENNISON SCHWEIZ AG
|
|
SWITZERLAND |
AVERY DENNISON SECURITY PRINTING EUROPE APS
|
|
DENMARK |
AVERY DENNISON SHARED SERVICES, INC.
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY DENNISON SINGAPORE INVESTMENTS B.V.
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
AVERY DENNISON SINGAPORE (PTE) LTD
|
|
SINGAPORE |
AVERY DENNISON SOUTH AFRICA (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
|
|
SOUTH AFRICA |
AVERY DENNISON SUOMI OY
|
|
FINLAND |
AVERY DENNISON SVERIGE AB
|
|
SWEDEN |
AVERY DENNISON SYSTEMES DETIQUETAGE FRANCE S.A.S.
|
|
FRANCE |
AVERY DENNISON S.R.L.
|
|
ROMANIA |
AVERY DENNISON TEKSTIL URUNLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
|
|
TURKEY |
AVERY DENNISON TAIWAN LIMITED
|
|
TAIWAN |
AVERY DENNISON U.K. II LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
AVERY DENNISON U.K. LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
AVERY DENNISON VERMOGENSVERWALTUNGS GMBH & CO K.G.
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON ZWECKFORM AUSTRIA GMBH
|
|
AUSTRIA |
AVERY DENNISON ZWECKFORM OFFICE PRODUCTS EUROPE GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON ZWECKFORM OFFICE PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
AVERY DENNISON (ASIA) HOLDINGS LIMITED
|
|
MAURITIUS |
AVERY DENNISON (CHINA) COMPANY LIMITED
|
|
CHINA |
AVERY DENNISON (FUZHOU) CONVERTED PRODUCTS LIMITED
|
|
CHINA |
|
|
|
|
|
JURISDICTION OF |
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY |
|
ORGANIZATION |
AVERY DENNISON (GUANGZHOU) CONVERTED PRODUCTS LIMITED
|
|
CHINA |
AVERY DENNISON (GUANGZHOU) CO. LTD.
|
|
CHINA |
AVERY DENNISON (HONG KONG) LIMITED
|
|
HONG KONG |
AVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
|
|
INDIA |
AVERY DENNISON (IRELAND) LIMITED
|
|
IRELAND |
AVERY DENNISON (KUNSHAN) CO., LIMITED
|
|
CHINA |
AVERY DENNISON (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.
|
|
MALAYSIA |
AVERY DENNISON (QINGDAO) CONVERTED PRODUCTS LIMITED
|
|
CHINA |
AVERY DENNISON (SUZHOU) CO. LIMITED
|
|
CHINA |
AVERY DENNISON (THAILAND) LTD.
|
|
THAILAND |
AVERY DENNISON (VIETNAM) LIMITED
|
|
VIETNAM |
AVERY DENNISON, S.A. DE C.V.
|
|
MEXICO |
AVERY GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY GUIDEX LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
AVERY HOLDING LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
AVERY HOLDING S.A.S.
|
|
FRANCE |
AVERY LLC
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY OFFICE PRODUCTS PUERTO RICO L.L.C.
|
|
PUERTO RICO |
AVERY PACIFIC LLC
|
|
U.S.A. |
AVERY PROPERTIES PTY. LIMITED
|
|
AUSTRALIA |
BEST COURAGE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
BONFIRE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
BONNIE NICE INDUSTRIES LTD.
|
|
HONG KONG |
COLLITEX S.R.L.
|
|
ITALY |
CREATERO GMBH
|
|
GERMANY |
DAH MEI LABEL LIMITED
|
|
HONG KONG |
DENNISON COMERCIO, IMPORTACAS E EXPORTACAO LTDA.
|
|
BRAZIL |
DENNISON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES
|
|
U.S.A. |
DENNISON INTERNATIONAL COMPANY
|
|
U.S.A. |
DENNISON MANUFACTURING COMPANY
|
|
U.S.A. |
DM LABELS & RIBBONS LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
DONGGUAN DAH MEI LABEL CO. LIMITED
|
|
CHINA |
EDMOND PACKAGING (GUANGZHOU) LTD.
|
|
CHINA |
EUSTON FINANCIAL LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
INDUSTRIAL DE MARCAS LTDA
|
|
COLOMBIA |
INFODRAGON MANAGEMENT LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
JAC ASIA PACIFIC SDN BHD
|
|
MALAYSIA |
JAC CARIBE C.S.Z.
|
|
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC |
JAC DO BRASIL LTDA.
|
|
BRAZIL |
JAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
|
|
NEW ZEALAND |
JAC (U.K.) LIMITED
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
JACKSTADT FRANCE S.N.C.
|
|
FRANCE |
JACKSTADT SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD.
|
|
SOUTH AFRICA |
JINTEX LIMITED
|
|
JERSEY, CHANNEL ISLANDS |
KUNSHAN DAH MEI WEAVING CO. LTD
|
|
CHINA |
L&E AMERICAS SERVICIOS, S. A. DE C.V.
|
|
MEXICO |
L&E PACKAGING FAR EAST LIMITED
|
|
HONG KONG |
MARKSTAR INTERNATIONAL LTD.
|
|
HONG KONG |
MODERN MARK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
|
|
HONG KONG |
MONARCH INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
U.S.A. |
MONARCH MARKING SYSTEMS HOLDINGS LTD
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
MONARCH MARKING (S.E.A.) PTE. LTD
|
|
SINGAPORE |
MONARCH SERVICE BUREAU LTD.
|
|
HONG KONG |
NAPERVILLE GLOBAL LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
NEW WALES FINANCE LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
NEWCLASSIC INVESTMENT LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
|
|
|
|
|
JURISDICTION OF |
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY |
|
ORGANIZATION |
PAXAR BANGLADESH LTD.
|
|
BANGLADESH |
PAXAR B. V.
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
PAXAR CANADA CORPORATION
|
|
CANADA |
PAXAR CORPORATION
|
|
U.S.A. |
PAXAR CORPORATION PTY LTD.
|
|
AUSTRALIA |
PAXAR CORPORATION (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.
|
|
MALAYSIA |
PAXAR CORPORATIVO MEXICO S. A. DE C. V.
|
|
MEXICO |
PAXAR DE COLOMBIA FTZ LTDA.
|
|
COLOMBIA |
PAXAR DE EL SALVADOR S. A. DE C. V.
|
|
EL SALVADOR |
PAXAR DE GUATEMALA, S. A.
|
|
GUATEMALA |
PAXAR DE MEXICO S. A. DE C. V.
|
|
MEXICO |
PAXAR DE NICARAGUA. S.A.
|
|
NICARAGUA |
PAXAR DO BRASIL LTDA
|
|
BRAZIL |
PAXAR EUROPE (1998) LTD.
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
PAXAR FAR EAST LTD.
|
|
HONG KONG |
PAXAR KOREA LTD.
|
|
SOUTH KOREA |
PAXAR MOROC SARL
|
|
MOROCCO |
PAXAR PACKAGING (GUANGZHOU) LTD.
|
|
CHINA |
PAXAR PAKISTAN (PVT) LTD.
|
|
PAKISTAN |
PAXAR PERU S. A. C.
|
|
PERU |
PAXAR PRINTING & PACKAGING (SHANGHAI) LTD.
|
|
CHINA |
PAXAR SISTEMAS LTDA
|
|
BRAZIL |
PAXAR SYSTEMS (GUANGZHOU) LTD.
|
|
CHINA |
PAXAR (CHINA) LTD.
|
|
HONG KONG |
PAXAR (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD.
|
|
SINGAPORE |
PAXAR (THAILAND) LIMITED
|
|
THAILAND |
PT AVERY DENNISON INDONESIA
|
|
INDONESIA |
PT AVERY DENNISON PACKAGING INDONESIA
|
|
INDONESIA |
P. T. PACIFIC LABEL INDONESIA
|
|
INDONESIA |
P. T. PAXAR INDONESIA
|
|
INDONESIA |
RAXAP ARRENDADORA, S. A. DE C. V.
|
|
MEXICO |
RAXAP SERVICIOS, S. A. DE C. V.
|
|
MEXICO |
RF IDENTICS, INC.
|
|
U.S.A. |
RINKE DIS TISCARET LTD (SIRKETI)
|
|
TURKEY |
RINKE ETIKET SERVIS SANAYI VE TICARET LTD SIRKETI
|
|
TURKEY |
RINKE FAR EAST LTD
|
|
HONG KONG |
RIPRO FAR EAST LTD
|
|
HONG KONG |
RVL AMERICAS, S DE R.L. DE C.V.
|
|
MEXICO |
RVL CENTRAL AMERICA, S. A.
|
|
GUATEMALA |
RVL PACKAGING FAR EAST LIMITED
|
|
HONG KONG |
RVL PACKAGING SINGAPORE PTE LTD.
|
|
SINGAPORE |
RVL PHILIPPINES, INC.
|
|
PHILIPPINES |
RVL PRINTED LABEL FAR EAST LIMITED
|
|
HONG KONG |
RVL SERVICE, S. DE R. L. DE C. V.
|
|
MEXICO |
SECURITY PRINTING DIVISION, INC.
|
|
U.S.A. |
SINGAPORE LACES & LABELS (PTE) LIMITED
|
|
SINGAPORE |
SKILLFIELD INVESTMENTS LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
SU ZHOU JI ZHONG GARMENTS ACCESSORY CO. LIMITED
|
|
CHINA |
SUZHOU FENG YI HENG YE DYE CO. ,LTD.
|
|
CHINA |
TESSITURA ITALIAN ETICHETTE S.R.L.
|
|
ITALY |
TIADECO PARTICIPACOES, LTDA.
|
|
BRAZIL |
TIGER EIGHT GROUP LIMITED
|
|
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS |
UNIVERSAL PACKAGING & DESIGN, LTD.
|
|
HONG KONG |
WORLDWIDE RISK INSURANCE, INC.
|
|
U.S.A. |
exv24
Exhibit 24
Power of Attorney
WHEREAS, Avery Dennison Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), proposes to file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director of the Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mitchell R. Butier and
Susan C. Miller, and each of them, as attorneys-in-fact for and in the name, place and stead of the
undersigned, and in the capacity of the undersigned as a director of the Company, to execute the
above referenced Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements thereto, hereby giving and granting to
said attorneys-in-fact, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
required and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes
as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each
attorney-in-fact may or shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney effective February 25,
2011.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dean A. Scarborough
Dean A. Scarborough
|
|
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bradley A. Alford
Bradley A. Alford
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter K. Barker
Peter K. Barker
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Rolf Börjesson
Rolf Börjesson
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John T. Cardis |
|
Director |
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ken C. Hicks
Ken C. Hicks
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter W. Mullin
Peter W. Mullin
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David E. I. Pyott
David E. I. Pyott
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Debra L. Reed
Debra L. Reed
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick T. Siewert
Patrick T. Siewert
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Julia A. Stewart
Julia A. Stewart
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, Dean A. Scarborough, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Avery Dennison Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dean A. Scarborough |
|
|
|
|
|
Dean A. Scarborough |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
February 25, 2011
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, Mitchell R. Butier, certify that:
|
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Avery Dennison Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mitchell R. Butier |
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell R. Butier |
|
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
February 25, 2011
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER*
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Avery Dennison Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to the best
of his knowledge, that:
|
(i) |
|
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
ended January 1, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. |
Dated: February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dean A. Scarborough
|
|
|
Dean A. Scarborough |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
* |
|
The above certification accompanies the issuers Annual Report on Form
10-K and is furnished, not filed, as provided in SEC Release 33-8238,
dated June 5, 2003. |
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER*
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Avery Dennison Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to the best
of his knowledge, that:
|
(i) |
|
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
ended January 1, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. |
Dated: February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mitchell R. Butier
|
|
Mitchell R. Butier |
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
* |
|
The above certification accompanies the issuers Annual Report on Form
10-K and is furnished, not filed, as provided in SEC Release 33-8238,
dated June 5, 2003. |