e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 27, 2008.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 1-7685
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
95-1492269 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
150 North Orange Grove Boulevard |
|
|
Pasadena, California
|
|
91103 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (626) 304-2000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of $1 par value common stock outstanding as of October 25, 2008: 106,285,574
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
FISCAL THIRD QUARTER 2008 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 3.1 |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 3.2 |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 10.1 |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
Avery Dennison Corporation
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
81.3 |
|
|
$ |
71.5 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $61.3 and $64.2 at
September 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively |
|
|
1,120.7 |
|
|
|
1,113.8 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
648.7 |
|
|
|
631.0 |
|
Current deferred and refundable income taxes |
|
|
153.8 |
|
|
|
128.1 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
132.4 |
|
|
|
113.9 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,136.9 |
|
|
|
2,058.3 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,245.8 |
|
|
|
3,195.9 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,702.5 |
) |
|
|
(1,604.5 |
) |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,543.3 |
|
|
|
1,591.4 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,775.0 |
|
|
|
1,683.3 |
|
Other intangibles resulting from business acquisitions, net |
|
|
298.0 |
|
|
|
314.2 |
|
Non-current deferred and refundable income taxes |
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
59.9 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
551.7 |
|
|
|
537.7 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,385.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,244.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
721.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,110.8 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
730.6 |
|
|
|
679.2 |
|
Current deferred and payable income taxes |
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
630.8 |
|
|
|
656.2 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,125.4 |
|
|
|
2,477.6 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,545.2 |
|
|
|
1,145.0 |
|
Long-term retirement benefits and other liabilities |
|
|
382.6 |
|
|
|
391.5 |
|
Non-current deferred and payable income taxes |
|
|
233.2 |
|
|
|
241.3 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 400,000,000 shares at
September 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007; issued 124,126,624 shares
at September 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007; outstanding 98,329,439
shares and 98,386,897 shares at September 27, 2008 and December 29,
2007, respectively |
|
|
124.1 |
|
|
|
124.1 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
747.4 |
|
|
|
781.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,382.3 |
|
|
|
2,290.2 |
|
Cost of unallocated ESOP shares |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
Employee stock benefit trusts, 7,926,135 shares and 8,063,898 shares at
September 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively |
|
|
(358.7 |
) |
|
|
(428.8 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 17,841,050 shares and 17,645,829 shares at
September 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively |
|
|
(867.7 |
) |
|
|
(858.2 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
84.8 |
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,098.6 |
|
|
|
1,989.4 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,385.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,244.8 |
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Avery Dennison Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,724.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,680.4 |
|
|
$ |
5,198.9 |
|
|
$ |
4,593.8 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1,290.5 |
|
|
|
1,214.2 |
|
|
|
3,850.3 |
|
|
|
3,352.9 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
434.3 |
|
|
|
466.2 |
|
|
|
1,348.6 |
|
|
|
1,240.9 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
325.5 |
|
|
|
330.4 |
|
|
|
994.5 |
|
|
|
849.5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
66.5 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
277.3 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
62.7 |
|
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
223.5 |
|
|
$ |
224.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
.64 |
|
|
$ |
.60 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
$ |
.63 |
|
|
$ |
.59 |
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
Dividends |
|
$ |
.41 |
|
|
$ |
.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
Common shares, assuming dilution |
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
Common shares outstanding at period end |
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
Certain prior year amounts have been restated to reflect the change in method of accounting for inventory from last-in, first-out (LIFO) to
first-in, first-out (FIFO) for certain businesses operating in the U.S.
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Avery Dennison Corporation
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(In millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
223.5 |
|
|
$ |
224.1 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
154.8 |
|
|
|
128.8 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Asset impairment and net loss on sale and disposal of assets |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
Other non-cash items, net |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities and other adjustments |
|
|
(96.3 |
) |
|
|
(138.6 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
382.3 |
|
|
|
305.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(97.8 |
) |
|
|
(136.3 |
) |
Purchase of software and other deferred charges |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
(39.9 |
) |
Payments for acquisitions |
|
|
(130.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,285.2 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments, net |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(254.4 |
) |
|
|
(1,458.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in borrowings (maturities of 90 days or less) |
|
|
(386.3 |
) |
|
|
1,263.1 |
|
Additional borrowings (maturities longer than 90 days) |
|
|
400.1 |
|
|
|
248.8 |
|
Payments of debt (maturities longer than 90 days) |
|
|
(.7 |
) |
|
|
(181.9 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(131.4 |
) |
|
|
(128.0 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(63.2 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(117.6 |
) |
|
|
1,170.7 |
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash balances |
|
|
(.5 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
81.3 |
|
|
$ |
77.3 |
|
|
Certain prior year amounts have been restated to reflect the change in method of accounting for inventory from last-in,
first-out (LIFO) to first-in, first-out (FIFO) for certain businesses operating in the U.S.
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Avery Dennison Corporation
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. General
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements include normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of Avery Dennison
Corporations (the Companys) interim results. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes in this Form 10-Q are presented as permitted by Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not contain certain information
included in the Companys 2007 annual financial statements and notes. This Form 10-Q should be
read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes included in the
Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The third quarters of 2008 and 2007 consisted of thirteen-week periods ending September 27, 2008
and September 29, 2007, respectively. The interim results of operations are not necessarily
indicative of future financial results.
Financial Presentation
Certain prior year amounts have been restated or reclassified to conform with the current year
presentation.
Change in Accounting Method
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company changed its method of accounting for
inventories for the Companys U.S. operations from a combination of the use of the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) and the last-in, first-out (LIFO) methods to the FIFO method. The inventories
for the Companys international operations continue to be valued using the FIFO method. The
Company believes the change is preferable as the FIFO method better reflects the current value of
inventories on the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet; provides better matching of
revenue and expense in the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income; provides uniformity across
the Companys operations with respect to the method for inventory accounting; and enhances
comparability with peers. Furthermore, this application of the FIFO method is consistent with the
Companys accounting of inventories for U.S. income tax purposes.
The change in accounting method from LIFO to FIFO method was completed in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
The Company applied the change in accounting principle by retrospectively restating prior years
financial statements. As a result of the change in the Companys policy for accounting for
inventory, pretax income for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007 was increased by
$.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Note 2. Acquisitions
On June 15, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Paxar Corporation (Paxar), a global
leader in retail tag, ticketing, and branding systems. In accordance with the terms of the
acquisition agreement, each outstanding share of Paxar common stock, par value $0.10, was converted
into the right to receive $30.50 in cash. At June 15, 2007, outstanding options to purchase Paxar
Common Stock, shares of Paxar restricted stock and Paxar performance share awards were converted
into weight-adjusted options to purchase the Companys common stock, shares of the Companys
restricted stock and, at the Companys election, shares of the Companys restricted stock or the
Companys restricted stock units, respectively. Since the date of acquisition, certain of these
equity awards have vested on an accelerated basis.
The Paxar operations are included in the Companys Retail Information Services segment. The
combination of the Paxar business into the Retail Information Services segment increases the
Companys presence in the retail information and brand identification market, combines
complementary strengths and broadens the range of the Companys product and service capabilities,
improves the Companys ability to meet customer demands for product innovation and improved quality
of service, and facilitates expansion into new product and geographic segments. The integration of
the acquisition into the Companys operations has resulted in significant cost synergies.
Purchase Price Allocation
The total purchase price was approximately $1.33 billion for the outstanding shares of Paxar,
including transaction costs of approximately $15 million.
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the allocation of the purchase price has
been made and recorded in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Avery Dennison Corporation
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
June 15, 2007 |
|
|
Current assets (including cash and cash equivalents of approximately $47 million) |
|
$ |
358.8 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
250.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1.1 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
241.6 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
939.9 |
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
1,792.2 |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
220.4 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
214.0 |
|
Other equity |
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
Total liabilities and other equity |
|
$ |
459.0 |
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
1,333.2 |
|
|
As a result of the Paxar acquisition, the Company assumed liabilities of approximately $434
million, including accounts payable and other current and long-term liabilities. Included in this
amount is approximately $5 million of long-term debt, which remains outstanding at September 27,
2008. In addition, the Company assumed additional standby letters of credit of $7.3 million.
The excess of the cost basis over the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired is
approximately $1.18 billion, including goodwill of approximately $940 million and identified
intangible assets of approximately $242 million, which includes amortizable and non-amortizable
intangible assets. The goodwill from this acquisition is not expected to be deductible for U.S.
tax purposes.
Identifiable intangible assets consist of customer relationships, patents and other acquired
technology and other intangibles. These intangible assets include approximately $183 million for
customer relationships with a weighted-average useful life of ten years; approximately $25 million
for patents and other acquired technology with a weighted-average useful life of eight years; and
approximately $4 million for other intangibles with a weighted-average useful life of ten years.
These acquired amortizable intangible assets have an estimated weighted-average useful life of nine
years. Furthermore, approximately $30 million of the acquired intangible assets related to trade
names and trademarks are not subject to amortization because they have an indefinite useful life.
Refer also to Note 5, Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions.
There were no in-progress research and development assets acquired as a result of the acquisition.
Paxar Integration Actions
As a result of the Paxar acquisition, the Company identified certain liabilities and other costs of
$25 million for restructuring actions which were recorded as part of the Companys purchase price
allocation. Included in this amount are severance costs for involuntary terminations of
approximately 1,365 Paxar employees of $21.1 million, lease cancellation costs of $3.2 million, and
other related costs of $.7 million. Severance costs are included in Other current liabilities in
the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Severance and other employee costs represent
cash paid or to be paid to employees terminated under these actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price |
|
(In millions) |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total severance and other employee costs accrued
during the quarters ended: |
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
11.3 |
|
March 29, 2008 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Total accrued |
|
|
21.1 |
|
2007 Settlements |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
2008 Settlements |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
Balance at September 27, 2008 |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Lease cancellations |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
7
Avery Dennison Corporation
Included in the assumed current liabilities were accrued restructuring costs related to Paxars
pre-acquisition restructuring program. At September 27, 2008, approximately $1 million remained
accrued in connection with this program.
Employee-Related Items
In connection with this acquisition, certain change-in-control provisions provided that $27.8
million was to be paid to certain key executives of Paxar. This amount includes severance,
bonuses, accelerated vesting of stock options, performance share awards, restricted stock, and
other items. In connection with these items, $.2 million remained accrued in Other current
liabilities in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 27, 2008. New
employment agreements for certain key executives retained by the Company provided for approximately
$8 million to be accrued over their requisite service periods, of which $5 million was recorded
during 2007 and $1.3 million was recorded during the first nine months of 2008 in the unaudited
Consolidated Statement of Income.
The estimated fair value of equity includes the total amount related to converted Paxar stock
options and performance share awards of approximately $24 million. This total includes amounts
related to converted but unvested stock options and performance share awards (approximately $5
million), which will be recognized in the Companys operating results over the remaining vesting
periods of these equity awards.
Pro Forma Results of Operations
The following table represents the unaudited pro forma results of operations for the Company as
though the acquisition of Paxar had occurred at the beginning of 2007. The pro forma results
include estimated interest expense associated with commercial paper borrowings to fund the
acquisition; amortization of intangible assets that have been acquired; adjustment to income tax
provision using the worldwide combined effective tax rates of both the Company and Paxar;
elimination of intercompany sales and profit in inventory; fair value adjustments to inventory; and
additional depreciation resulting from fair value amounts allocated to real and personal property
over the estimated useful lives. The pro forma results of operations have been prepared based on
the allocation of the purchase price. This pro forma information is for comparison purposes only,
and is not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the acquisition been
completed at the beginning of 2007, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
September 29, 2007(1) |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
5,008.3 |
|
Net income |
|
|
199.0 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
2.03 |
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The pro forma results of operations for the first nine months of 2007 include the
impact of Paxars restructuring costs and other charges of $1.8 and merger-related costs of
$1.5, as well as the Companys restructuring costs and other charges discussed in Note 17,
Segment Information. |
Prior to the acquisition, the Company sold certain roll materials products to Paxar. The Companys
net sales to Paxar prior to the acquisition were approximately $8 million during the first nine
months of 2007.
Other Acquisitions
On April 1, 2008, the Company acquired DM Label Group (DM Label). DM Label operations are
included in the Companys Retail Information Services segment. Since the acquisition, the impact
of this acquisition on the Companys revenues was approximately $26 million.
The preliminary balance sheet allocation of the purchase price as of September 27, 2008 has been
made and recorded in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The preliminary
allocation of the purchase price included an estimated $67 million of goodwill. Refer also to Note
5, Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions.
8
Avery Dennison Corporation
Note 3. Accounts Receivable
The Company recorded expenses related to the allowances for trade accounts receivable of $13.1
million and $11.4 million for the nine months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007,
respectively. The Company records these allowances based on estimates related to the following
factors:
|
|
|
Customer specific allowances |
|
|
|
|
Amounts based upon an aging schedule |
|
|
|
|
An estimated amount, based on the Companys historical experience |
Note 4. Inventories
Inventories consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
272.8 |
|
|
$ |
252.6 |
|
Work-in-progress |
|
|
157.7 |
|
|
|
151.5 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
289.7 |
|
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
Inventories at lower of FIFO cost or market (approximates replacement cost) |
|
|
720.2 |
|
|
|
708.3 |
|
Inventory reserves |
|
|
(71.5 |
) |
|
|
(77.3 |
) |
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
648.7 |
|
|
$ |
631.0 |
|
|
Note 5. Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions
Changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the periods shown, by reportable segment, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure- |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Office and |
|
|
specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
converting |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Materials |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
businesses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
332.4 |
|
|
$ |
200.5 |
|
|
$ |
169.1 |
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
$ |
715.9 |
|
Goodwill acquired during the period (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
935.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
935.7 |
|
Acquisition adjustments (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.5 |
) |
Translation adjustments |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
354.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,137.7 |
|
|
$ |
177.6 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,683.3 |
|
Goodwill acquired during the period (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.5 |
|
Acquisition adjustments (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Transfers (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
Balance as of September 27, 2008 |
|
$ |
352.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,242.6 |
|
|
$ |
175.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,775.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Goodwill acquired during the period includes Paxar acquisition in June 2007, as well
as buy-outs of minority interest shareholders associated with RVL Packaging, Inc. and Paxar. |
|
(2) |
|
Acquisition adjustments in 2007 consisted of a tax adjustment associated with RVL
Packaging, Inc. |
|
(3) |
|
Goodwill acquired during the period consisted of the DM Label acquisition in April
2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Acquisition adjustments in 2008 consisted of opening balance sheet adjustments
associated with the Paxar acquisition in June 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Related to the transfer of a business from other specialty converting businesses to
Retail Information Services to align with a change in the Companys internal reporting
structure. |
As of September 27, 2008, goodwill and other intangible assets and related useful lives include the
allocations of the purchase price of the Companys recent acquisitions, based on valuations of the
acquired assets. Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions, for further information.
In connection with the Paxar acquisition, the Company acquired approximately $30 million of
intangible assets, consisting of certain trade names and trademarks, which are not subject to
amortization because they have an indefinite useful life. These intangible assets are not included
in the table below, had a negative currency impact of $.1 million at September 27, 2008.
9
Avery Dennison Corporation
The following table sets forth the Companys other intangible assets resulting from business
acquisitions at September 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007, which continue to be amortized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortizable other intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
283.1 |
|
|
$ |
62.0 |
|
|
$ |
221.1 |
|
|
$ |
276.1 |
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
234.3 |
|
Patents and other acquired technology |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
Trade names and trademarks |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
391.9 |
|
|
$ |
123.8 |
|
|
$ |
268.1 |
|
|
$ |
383.3 |
|
|
$ |
99.1 |
|
|
$ |
284.2 |
|
|
Amortization expense on other intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions was $8.9
million and $24.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008, respectively, and
$7 million and $12.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense for other intangible assets resulting from completed business
acquisitions as of September 27, 2008 for this fiscal year and each of the next four fiscal years
is expected to be approximately $30 million, $30 million, $29 million, $29 million and $29 million,
respectively.
The weighted-average amortization periods from the date of acquisition for amortizable intangible
assets resulting from business acquisitions are fourteen years for customer relationships, eleven
years for trade names and trademarks, thirteen years for patents and other acquired technology,
eight years for other intangibles and fourteen years in total. As of September 27, 2008, the
weighted-average remaining useful life of acquired amortizable intangible assets are eleven years
for customer relationships, five years for trade names and trademarks, eight years for patents and
other acquired technology, five years for other intangibles and nine years in total.
Note 6. Debt
In February 2008, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a credit agreement for a
term loan credit facility with fifteen domestic and foreign banks for a total commitment of $400
million, maturing February 8, 2011. The subsidiarys payment and performance under the agreement
are guaranteed by the Company. Financing available under the agreement was permitted to be used
for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including acquisitions. The term loan
credit facility typically bears interest at an annual rate of, at the subsidiarys option, either
(i) between LIBOR plus 0.300% and LIBOR plus 0.850%, depending on the Companys debt ratings by
either Standard & Poors Rating Service (S&P) or Moodys Investors Service (Moodys), or (ii)
the higher of (A) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (B) the prime rate. The Company used the
term loan credit facility to reduce commercial paper borrowings previously issued to fund the
acquisition of Paxar. The term loan credit facility is subject to customary financial covenants,
including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
In February 2008, the Company terminated its bridge revolving credit agreement, dated June 13,
2007, with five domestic and foreign banks.
The terms of various loan agreements in effect at September 27, 2008 require that the Company
maintain specified ratios on total debt and interest expense in relation to certain measures of income.
Under the loan agreements, the ratio of total debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization, and other adjustments for the most recent twelve-month fiscal period may not exceed
3.5 to 1.0. In addition, earnings before interest, taxes, and other adjustments, as a ratio to
interest for the most recent twelve-month fiscal period may not be less than 3.5 to 1.0. As of
September 27, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these debt covenants.
Note 7. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the periods shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
(In millions) |
|
U.S. |
|
|
Intl |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Intl |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Intl |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Intl |
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(38.2 |
) |
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
10
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Postretirement Health Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(In millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
Components of net periodic
benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
.3 |
|
|
$ |
.3 |
|
|
$ |
.8 |
|
|
$ |
.8 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
.9 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(.5 |
) |
|
|
(.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
.6 |
|
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
The Company contributed $2.7 million and $1.8 million to its U.S. pension plans during the nine
months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007, respectively. The Company expects to
contribute an additional $1 million to its U.S. pension plans for the remainder of 2008.
Additionally, the Company contributed $2.4 million and $4.6 million to its U.S. postretirement
health benefit plan during the nine months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007,
respectively. For the remainder of 2008, the Company expects to contribute an additional $.8
million to its U.S. postretirement health benefit plan.
The Company contributed $11.4 million and $10.3 million to its international pension plans during
the nine months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007, respectively. For the remainder
of 2008, the Company expects to contribute an additional $5.2 million to its international pension
plans.
For the
nine months ended September 27, 2008, actual returns for the
Companys defined benefit
plans were below the expected rate of return due to adverse conditions in the equity and debt
markets. Continued actual returns below the expected rate of return would impact the amount and
timing of the Companys future contributions to these defined
benefit plans.
Note 8. Research and Development
Research and development expense for the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008 was $23.8
million and $72.2 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007,
research and development expense was $25.2 million and $71 million, respectively.
Note 9. Stock-Based Compensation
Net income included pretax stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, performance
units (PUs), restricted stock units (RSUs) and restricted stock of $24 million and $15.5
million for the nine months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007, respectively. Total
stock-based compensation expense was recorded in corporate expense and the Companys operating
segments, as appropriate.
During the second quarter 2008, following the Companys shareholders approval of the amended and
restated stock option and incentive plan on April 24, 2008, the Company granted PUs to certain
eligible employees of the Company. These PUs are payable in shares of the Companys common stock
at the end of a three-year cliff vesting period provided that certain performance objective metrics
are achieved at the end of the period ending December 31, 2010. During the first nine months of
2008, the Company recognized $2.7 million of pretax compensation expense related to PUs, which is
included in the stock-based compensation expense noted above.
On February 28, 2008, the Company granted its annual stock option awards to employees and
directors. The provision of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, requires that options granted
to retirement-eligible employees be treated as though they were immediately vested; as a result,
the pretax compensation expense related to such options (approximately $3 million) was recognized
during the nine months ended September 27, 2008 and is included in the stock-based compensation
expense noted above.
As of September 27, 2008, the Company has approximately $56 million of unrecognized compensation
cost related to unvested stock options, PUs, RSUs and restricted stock under the Companys plans.
Total unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining
weighted-average requisite service period of approximately 3 years for stock options, and 2 years
for PUs, RSUs and restricted stock.
11
Avery Dennison Corporation
Note 10. Cost Reduction Actions
Severance charges recorded under the restructuring actions below are included in Other current
liabilities in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Severance and other employee
costs represent cash paid or to be paid to employees terminated under these actions. Charges below
are included in Other expense, net in the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income.
Third Quarter 2008
In the third quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $12.5 million consisting of
$8.7 million of severance and other employee costs resulting in the elimination of approximately
310 positions impacting all segments, as well as $2.9 million of asset impairment charges and $.9
million of lease cancellation charges. As of September 27, 2008, approximately 175 employees
impacted by these actions remain with the Company, and are expected to leave by early 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure- |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Office and |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
converting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
businesses |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total severance and other employee costs
accrued during the quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
$ |
.9 |
|
|
$ |
.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
2008 Settlements |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
(.3 |
) |
|
|
(.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
Balance at September 27, 2008 |
|
$ |
.7 |
|
|
$ |
.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease cancellations |
|
|
.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.9 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
Second Quarter 2008
In the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $10.3 million consisting of
$7.2 million of severance and other employee costs resulting in the elimination of approximately
310 positions impacting all segments, as well as $1.7 million of asset impairment charges and $1.4
million of lease cancellation charges. As of September 27, 2008, approximately 110 employees
impacted by these actions remain with the Company, and are expected to leave by early 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure- |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Office and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total severance and other employee costs
accrued during the quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
2008 Settlements |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
Balance at September 27, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease cancellations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
First Quarter 2008
In the first quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $5.6 million consisting of
$3.3 million of severance and other
12
Avery Dennison Corporation
employee costs resulting in the elimination of approximately 155 positions impacting all segments,
as well as $2.3 million of asset impairment charges. As of September 27, 2008, approximately 60
employees impacted by these actions remain with the Company, and are expected to leave by early
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure- |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Office and |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
converting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
businesses |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total severance and other employee costs
accrued during the quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, 2008 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
2008 Settlements |
|
|
(.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
(.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
Balance at September 27, 2008 |
|
$ |
.8 |
|
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
2007
In 2007, the Company continued its cost reduction efforts that were initiated in late 2006 and
implemented additional actions resulting in a headcount reduction of approximately 615 positions,
impairment of certain assets and software, as well as lease cancellations. At September 27, 2008,
approximately 70 employees impacted by these actions remain with the Company, and are expected to
leave by early 2009. Pretax charges related to these actions totaled $57.5 million, including
severance and other employee costs of $21.6 million, impairment of fixed assets and buildings of
$17.4 million, software impairment of $17.1 million and lease cancellation charges of $1.4 million.
The table below details the accruals and payments related to these actions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure- |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Office and |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensitive |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
converting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
businesses |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total severance and other employee costs
accrued during the quarters ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.9 |
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(.6 |
) |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
Total expense accrued during 2007 |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(.6 |
) |
|
|
21.6 |
|
2007 Settlements |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
2008 Settlements |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
Balance at September 27, 2008 |
|
$ |
.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Lease cancellations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
35.9 |
|
|
Note 11. Financial Instruments and Foreign Currency
The Company enters into certain foreign exchange hedge contracts to reduce its risk from exchange
rate fluctuations associated with receivables, payables, loans and firm commitments denominated in
certain foreign currencies that arise primarily as a result of its operations outside the U.S. The
Company enters into certain interest rate contracts to help manage its exposure to interest rate
fluctuations. The Company also enters into certain natural gas and other commodity futures
contracts to hedge price fluctuations for a
13
Avery Dennison Corporation
portion of its anticipated domestic purchases. The maximum length of time in which the Company
hedges its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions is
generally 12 to 24 months.
The aggregate reclassification from other comprehensive income to earnings for settlement or
ineffectiveness of hedge activity was a net gain of $.6 million and $1.2 million during the three
and nine months ended September 27, 2008, respectively. This reclassification was a net loss of
$7.6 million and $12.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007,
respectively. These aggregate reclassifications were reported in Marketing, general and
administrative expense in the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income. The effect of the
settlement of currency hedges included in this reclassification is offset by the currency impact of
the underlying hedged activity. A net loss of approximately $5 million is expected to be
reclassified from other comprehensive income to earnings within the next 12 months.
Included in the reclassification amount discussed above is the amortization of certain hedge costs
of approximately $7 million incurred in connection with the long-term debt issued in 2007 related
to the Paxar acquisition. Such costs are being amortized over the life of the related forecasted
hedge transactions.
Transactions in foreign currencies (including receivables, payables and loans denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency) increased net income by $3.1 million and $14.4
million for the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008, respectively, which included a
foreign currency net gain related to certain intercompany transactions of approximately $1 million
and approximately $7 million during the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008,
respectively. Transactions in foreign currencies had a positive impact of $.6 million and $1.7
million on the Companys net income for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007,
respectively. These results exclude the effects of translation of foreign currencies on the
Companys financial statements.
In the first nine months of 2007 and 2008, no translation gains or losses for hyperinflationary
economies were recognized in net income since the Company had no operations in hyperinflationary
economies.
Note 12. Taxes Based on Income
The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2008 was approximately 7%, compared to
approximately 12% for the same period in 2007. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 was approximately 8%, compared to approximately 19% for the nine months ended
September 29, 2007. The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2008 includes the benefit
of approximately $37 million from discrete events. Discrete events include a benefit of
approximately $42 million for the increased realizability of deferred tax assets, a net benefit of
approximately $3 million of infrequent tax benefits and return filing adjustments, and a detriment
of approximately $8 million from tax contingency accruals. The Companys effective tax rate is
lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to the Companys operations outside the U.S.
where the statutory tax rates are generally lower, and the favorable impact of our global tax
structure. Additional taxes are not provided for most foreign earnings because the Company
currently plans to indefinitely reinvest these amounts.
In June 2008, the Company identified and committed to a plan that will utilize tax loss
carryforwards, resulting in a valuation allowance release of approximately $11 million. This is
distinct from the plan in the first quarter of 2008 described below.
In March 2008, the Company identified and committed to a plan that resulted in a partial valuation
allowance release of approximately $21 million. During implementation of this plan in the third
quarter of 2008, an additional benefit of approximately $9 million was recognized for the increased
realizability of deferred tax assets. One aspect of the plan will result in taxable income from
financing for a finite period of approximately three years in a jurisdiction that historically has
had tax losses. Notwithstanding an unlimited carryforward period in this jurisdiction, deferred
tax assets for the prior year losses were subject to a full valuation allowance as of December 29,
2007, due to the lack of sufficient evidence of future profitability in the jurisdiction. The
Company does not expect to utilize the remaining tax losses in that jurisdiction and has continued
to maintain a valuation allowance for the remaining tax losses.
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to ongoing audits by taxing jurisdictions
around the world. The Companys estimate of the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is
subject to managements assessment of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that
time. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for reasonably foreseeable outcomes
related to these matters. However, the Companys future results may include favorable or
unfavorable adjustments to its estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or
resolved, which may impact the Companys effective tax rate. With some exceptions, the Company and
its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years
prior to 2003.
It is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months, the Company may realize a decrease in its
gross uncertain tax positions by approximately $35 million, primarily as the result of the
expiration of statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions, settlements of tax audits and cash
payments. The Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that payments of approximately
$11 million will be
made in the next 12 months.
14
Avery Dennison Corporation
On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 was signed into law extending
the U.S. Research and Experimentation credit for 2008 and 2009. As this event occurred subsequent
to the end of the quarter, the benefit for this tax credit is not included in the Companys results
for the period ended September 27, 2008.
Note 13. Net Income Per Share
Net income per common share amounts were computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
(A) Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
62.7 |
|
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
223.5 |
|
|
$ |
224.1 |
|
|
(B) Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
Dilutive shares (additional common shares issuable under
employee stock options, PUs, RSUs and restricted stock) |
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
|
(C) Weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding, assuming dilution |
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
Net income per common share (A) ÷ (B) |
|
$ |
.64 |
|
|
$ |
.60 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution (A) ÷ (C) |
|
$ |
.63 |
|
|
$ |
.59 |
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
Certain employee stock options and RSUs were not included in the computation of net income per
common share, assuming dilution, because they would not have had a dilutive effect. Employee stock
options and RSUs excluded from the computation represented an aggregate of 10.4 million shares and
10 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008, respectively, and 4.3
million shares and 3.1 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007,
respectively.
Note 14. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income, foreign currency translation adjustments, net actuarial
loss, prior service cost and net transition assets, net of tax, and the gains or losses on the
effective portion of cash flow and firm commitment hedges, net of tax, that are currently presented
as a component of shareholders equity. The Companys total comprehensive (loss) income was
($57.6) million and $213.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008,
respectively, and $102.1 million and $304.7 million for the three and nine months ended September
29, 2007, respectively.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax, with the exception of the
foreign currency translation adjustment), at the end of the following periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
December 29, 2007 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
226.5 |
|
|
$ |
243.1 |
|
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition assets, less amortization |
|
|
(136.2 |
) |
|
|
(141.5 |
) |
Net loss on derivative instruments designated as cash flow and firm commitment
hedges |
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
(16.8 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
75.0 |
|
|
$ |
84.8 |
|
|
Cash flow and firm commitment hedging instrument activity in other comprehensive income, net of
tax, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
Beginning accumulated derivative loss |
|
$ |
(16.8 |
) |
Net gain reclassified to earnings |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Net change in the revaluation of hedging transactions |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
Ending accumulated derivative net loss |
|
$ |
(15.3 |
) |
|
Note 15. Fair Value Measurement
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements, which is
15
Avery Dennison Corporation
effective for fiscal years and interim periods after November 15, 2007. This statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure
requirements. This statement applies to all financial assets and liabilities and to all
non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis. The statement indicates, among other things, that a
fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs
in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the
most advantageous market for the asset or liability. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value based upon an
exit price model.
In connection with the issuance of SFAS No. 157, the FASB issued FASB Staff Positions (FSP) Nos.
157-1 and 157-2. FSP No. 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13, Accounting for
Leases, and its related interpretive accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions.
FSP No. 157-2 delays the effective date of the application of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that
are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 as of the beginning of 2008 fiscal year, with the exception of the
application of the statement to non-recurring non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities.
Non-recurring non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities for which the Company has not
applied the provisions of SFAS No. 157 include those measured at fair value in goodwill impairment
testing, indefinitely-lived intangible assets measured at fair value for impairment testing, and
those initially measured at fair value in business combinations. SFAS No. 157 establishes a
three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These
tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level
2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or
indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market
data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions to determine the best
estimate of fair value.
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a
recurring basis as of September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Total as of |
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
(In millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Available for sale securities are measured at fair value using quoted prices and classified within
Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Derivatives that are exchange-traded are measured at fair value
using quoted market prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Derivatives measured based on inputs that are readily available in public markets are classified
within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
The Company has deferred compensation obligations, which are not subject to fair value
measurements. These obligations are funded by corporate-owned life insurance contracts and standby
letters of credit.
The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a significant impact on the Companys financial results
of operations or financial position.
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
Industry Investigations
On August 26, 2008, the Company was notified that the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
had closed its investigation (initiated in August 2005) into the Companys activities in the label
stock industry without further action.
In April 2003, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint challenging the then
proposed merger of UPM-Kymmene (UPM) and the Morgan Adhesives (MACtac) division of Bemis Co.,
Inc. (Bemis). The complaint alleged, among other things, that UPM and [Avery Dennison] have
already attempted to limit competition between themselves, as reflected in written and oral
communications to each other through high level executives regarding explicit anticompetitive
understandings, although the extent to
16
Avery Dennison Corporation
which these efforts have succeeded is not entirely clear to the United States at the present time.
The DOJ concurrently announced a criminal investigation into competitive practices in the label
stock industry. Other investigations into competitive practices in the label stock industry were
subsequently initiated by the European Commission, the Competition Law Division of the Department
of Justice of Canada, and the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission. The Company cooperated
with all of these investigations, and all have subsequently been terminated without further action
by the authorities.
On April 24, 2003, Sentry Business Products, Inc. filed a purported class action on behalf of
direct purchasers of label stock in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois against the Company, UPM, Bemis and certain of their subsidiaries seeking treble damages
and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, essentially repeating the underlying
allegations of the DOJ merger complaint. Ten similar complaints were filed in various federal
district courts. In November 2003, the cases were transferred to the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and consolidated for pretrial purposes. Plaintiffs filed a
consolidated complaint on February 16, 2004, which the Company answered on March 31, 2004. On
April 14, 2004, the court separated the proceedings as to class certification and merits discovery,
and limited the initial phase of discovery to the issue of the appropriateness of class
certification. On January 4, 2006, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On January 20, 2006,
the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint. On August 14, 2006, the plaintiffs moved to
certify a proposed class. The Company and other defendants opposed this motion. On March 1, 2007,
the court heard oral argument on the issue of the appropriateness of class certification. On
August 28, 2007, plaintiffs moved to lift the discovery stay, which the Company opposed. The court
substantively granted class certification on November 19, 2007. The Company filed a petition to
appeal this decision on December 4, 2007, which was denied on March 6, 2008. On July 22, 2008, the
district court held a hearing to set a schedule for merits discovery. The court subsequently
entered an order that requires the parties to complete fact discovery by June 22, 2009.
Dispositive motions are due on March 19, 2010. The Company intends to defend these matters
vigorously.
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles,
California, a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock against the
Company, UPM and UPMs subsidiary Raflatac (Raflatac), seeking treble damages and other relief
for alleged unlawful competitive practices, essentially repeating the underlying allegations of the
DOJ merger complaint. Three similar complaints were filed in various California courts. In
November 2003, on petition from the parties, the California Judicial Council ordered the cases be
coordinated for pretrial purposes. The cases were assigned to a coordination trial judge in the
Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco on March 30, 2004. On September 30, 2004,
the Harman Press amended its complaint to add Bemis subsidiary Morgan Adhesives Company (MACtac)
as a defendant. On January 21, 2005, American International Distribution Corporation filed a
purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court for Chittenden
County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the
District Court of Johnson County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on February 16, 2005 in the
District Court of Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a
purported multi-state class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke
County, Tennessee. The Nebraska, Kansas and Vermont cases are currently stayed. Defendants
motion to dismiss the Tennessee case, filed on March 30, 2006, is pending. The Company intends to
defend these matters vigorously.
On August 18, 2005, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission notified two of the Companys
subsidiaries in Australia, that it was seeking information in connection with a label stock
investigation. The Company cooperated with the now closed investigation.
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of independent directors to oversee
the foregoing matters.
The Company is unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect
could be adverse and material.
Environmental
The Company has been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at nineteen waste disposal or
waste recycling sites, including Paxar sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil and/or groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of
the Companys liability has been agreed. The Company is participating with other PRPs at such
sites, and anticipates that its share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to remedial
agreements entered into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other governmental
authorities.
The Company has accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites, including sites in which
governmental agencies have designated the Company as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will
be incurred and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of the
uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future expense
to remediate the currently identified sites and any sites which could be identified in the future
for cleanup could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
As of September 27, 2008, the Companys estimated accrued liability associated with compliance and
remediation costs was
17
Avery Dennison Corporation
approximately $60 million, including estimated liabilities related to the Companys recent
acquisitions.
Other amounts currently accrued are not significant to the consolidated financial position of the
Company, and, based upon current information, management believes it is unlikely that the resolution
of these matters will significantly impact the Companys consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
Product Warranty
The Company provides for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under its basic limited warranty
at the time product revenue is recognized. These costs primarily include materials and labor
associated with the service or sale of the product. Factors that affect the Companys warranty
liability include the number of units installed or sold, historical and anticipated rate of
warranty claims on those units, cost per claim to satisfy the Companys warranty obligation and
availability of insurance coverage. As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future
expectations, the Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the
amounts as necessary. As of September 27, 2008, product warranty liabilities were approximately $2
million.
Other
In 2005, the Company contacted relevant authorities in the U.S. and reported on the results of an
internal investigation of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The
transactions at issue were carried out by a small number of employees of the Companys reflective
business in China, and involved, among other things, impermissible payments or attempted
impermissible payments. The payments or attempted payments and the contracts associated with them
appear to have been relatively minor in amount and of limited duration. Corrective and
disciplinary actions have been taken. Sales of the Companys reflective business in China in 2005
were approximately $7 million. Based on findings to date, no changes to the Companys previously
filed financial statements are warranted as a result of these matters. However, the Company
expects that fines or other penalties could be incurred. While the Company is unable to predict
the financial or operating impact of any such fines or penalties, it believes that its behavior in
detecting, investigating, responding to and voluntarily disclosing these matters to authorities
should be viewed favorably.
In addition, on or about October 10, 2008, the Company notified relevant authorities that it had
discovered questionable payments to certain foreign customs and other regulatory officials by some
employees of its recently acquired companies. These payments do not appear to have been made for
the purpose of obtaining business from any governmental entity. The Company is in the process of
conducting a review and is taking remedial measures to comply with the provisions of the U.S.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits, claims and inquiries, most
of which are routine to the nature of the Companys business. Based upon current information,
management believes that the resolution of these other matters will not materially affect the
Companys financial position.
The Company participates in international receivable financing programs with several financial
institutions whereby advances may be requested from these financial institutions. Such advances
are guaranteed by the Company. At September 27, 2008, the Company had guaranteed approximately $14
million.
As of September 27, 2008, the Company guaranteed up to approximately $22 million of certain foreign
subsidiaries obligations to their suppliers, as well as approximately $573 million of certain
subsidiaries lines of credit with various financial institutions.
In November 2007, the Company issued $400 million of 7.875% Corporate HiMEDS units, a mandatory
convertible debt issue. An additional $40 million of HiMEDS units were issued in December 2007 as
a result of the exercise of the overallotment allocation from the initial issuance. Each HiMEDS
unit is comprised of two components a purchase contract obligating the holder to purchase from
the Company a certain number of shares of the Companys common stock in 2010 ranging from
approximately 6.8 million to approximately 8.6 million shares (depending on the quoted price per
share of the Companys common stock at that time) and a senior note due in 2020. The net proceeds
from the offering were approximately $427 million, which were used to reduce commercial paper
borrowings initially used to finance the Paxar acquisition.
Note 17. Segment Information
As discussed in Note 2, Acquisitions, the Company completed the acquisition of Paxar during the
second quarter of 2007 and the acquisition of DM Label during the second quarter of 2008. The
operating results for the Companys recent acquisitions are included in the Retail Information
Services segment.
18
Avery Dennison Corporation
Financial information by reportable segment and other businesses is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
(In millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
Net sales to unaffiliated customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials |
|
$ |
936.2 |
|
|
$ |
868.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,835.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,607.6 |
|
Retail Information Services |
|
|
379.1 |
|
|
|
388.7 |
|
|
|
1,189.3 |
|
|
|
764.6 |
|
Office and Consumer Products |
|
|
260.4 |
|
|
|
266.9 |
|
|
|
710.2 |
|
|
|
744.0 |
|
Other specialty converting businesses |
|
|
149.1 |
|
|
|
156.5 |
|
|
|
463.7 |
|
|
|
477.6 |
|
|
Net sales to unaffiliated customers |
|
$ |
1,724.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,680.4 |
|
|
$ |
5,198.9 |
|
|
$ |
4,593.8 |
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials |
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
|
$ |
132.7 |
|
|
$ |
119.6 |
|
Retail Information Services |
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Office and Consumer Products |
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Other specialty converting businesses |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(54.0 |
) |
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
|
|
(157.3 |
) |
|
|
(136.6 |
) |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Income before taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials |
|
$ |
60.6 |
|
|
$ |
68.3 |
|
|
$ |
210.5 |
|
|
$ |
239.7 |
|
Retail Information Services |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
Office and Consumer Products |
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
102.5 |
|
|
|
117.5 |
|
Other specialty converting businesses |
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
Corporate expense |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(28.4 |
) |
Interest expense (5) |
|
|
(29.0 |
) |
|
|
(35.7 |
) |
|
|
(87.8 |
) |
|
|
(70.9 |
) |
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
67.3 |
(1) |
|
$ |
66.5 |
(2) |
|
$ |
242.4 |
(3) |
|
$ |
277.3 |
(4) |
|
Certain prior year amounts have been restated to reflect the change in method of accounting for
inventory from last-in, first-out (LIFO) to first-in, first-out (FIFO) for certain businesses
operating in the U.S.
(1) |
|
Operating income for the third quarter of 2008 included Other expense, net
totaling $12.5 consisting of restructuring costs of $8.7 and asset impairment and lease
cancellation charges of $3.8. Of the total $12.5, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment
recorded $4.1, the Retail Information Services segment recorded $.8, the Office and Consumer
Products segment recorded $3.3, the other specialty converting businesses recorded $1.3 and
Corporate recorded $3. |
|
|
|
Additionally, operating income for the Retail Information Services segment for the third quarter
of 2008 included $5.2 of transition costs associated with the Companys recent acquisitions. |
|
(2) |
|
Operating income for the third quarter of 2007 included Other expense, net
totaling $33.6 consisting of asset impairment and lease cancellation charges of $12.4,
integration-related asset impairment charges of $8.9, restructuring costs of $7.5 and certain
non-recurring financing costs of $4.8. Of the total $33.6, the Pressure-sensitive Materials
segment recorded $14, the Retail Information Services segment recorded $12, the Office and
Consumer Products segment recorded $.5, the other specialty converting businesses recorded
$1.5 and Corporate recorded $5.6. |
|
|
|
Additionally, operating income for the Retail Information Services segment for the third quarter
of 2007 included $16 of transition costs associated with the Paxar acquisition. |
|
(3) |
|
Operating income for the first nine months of 2008 included Other expense, net
totaling $23.9 consisting of restructuring costs of $19.2 and asset impairment and lease
cancellation charges of $9.2, partially offset by a gain on sale of investments of ($4.5). Of
the total $23.9, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $7.9, the Retail
Information Services segment recorded $7.6, the Office and Consumer Products segment recorded
$7.6, the other specialty converting businesses recorded $1.4 and Corporate recorded ($.6). |
19
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
Additionally, operating income for the Retail Information Services segment for the first nine
months of 2008 included $17.9 of transition costs associated with the Companys recent
acquisitions. |
|
(4) |
|
Operating income for the first nine months of 2007 included Other expense, net
totaling $43.2 consisting of integration-related asset impairment charges of $18.4, asset
impairment and lease cancellation charges of $12.4, restructuring costs of $10.5, certain
non-recurring financing costs of $4.8 and expenses related to a divestiture of $.3, partially
offset by a reversal of an accrual of ($3.2) related to a lawsuit. Of the total $43.2,
the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $12.8, the Retail Information Services
segment recorded $21.9, the Office and Consumer Products segment recorded $1.4, the other
specialty converting businesses recorded $1.5 and Corporate recorded $5.6. |
|
|
|
Additionally, operating income for the Retail Information Services segment for the first nine
months of 2007 included $26.2 of transition costs associated with the Paxar acquisition. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008 included
interest associated with borrowings to fund the Companys recent acquisitions of $16.4 and
$49.2, respectively. Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007
included interest associated with borrowings to fund the Paxar acquisition of $18.9 and $22.1,
respectively. |
Note 18. Recent Accounting Requirements
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-6-1, Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. Under this
issue, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in
the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP-EITF 03-6-1 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those years and requires retrospective application. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting FSP-EITF 03-6-1 on its earnings per share.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 identifies a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting
accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for nongovernmental entities (the Hierarchy).
The Hierarchy within SFAS No. 162 is consistent with that previously defined in the AICPA Statement
on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 69, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the United States
Securities and Exchange Commissions approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. The adoption of SFAS No. 162 will not have a material effect on the
Consolidated Financial Statements because the Company has utilized the guidance within SAS No. 69.
In April 2008, the FASB directed the FASB Staff to issue FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets. FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used for purposes of determining the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is intended to improve the
consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the
period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R) and
other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is not permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this Statement on the Companys financial results of operations and
financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. This Statement is intended to improve
transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures of an entitys derivative
instruments and hedging activities and their effects on the entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 applies to all derivative instruments within the scope
of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as well as related
hedged items, bifurcated derivatives, and non-derivative instruments that are designated and
qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to SFAS No. 161 must provide
more robust qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS No. 161 is
effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the disclosure implications of this Statement.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementsan amendment of Accounting Review Board (ARB) No. 51. This Statement is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with
earlier adoption prohibited. This Statement requires the recognition of a non-controlling interest
(minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the
parents equity. The amount of net income attributable
20
Avery Dennison Corporation
to the non-controlling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the income
statement. It also amends certain of ARB No. 51s consolidation procedures for consistency with
the requirements of SFAS No. 141(R). This Statement also includes expanded disclosure requirements
regarding the interests of the parent and its non-controlling interest. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this Statement on the Companys financial results of operations and
financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. This Statement
replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains
control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date
as the date that the acquirer achieves control. This Statements scope is broader than that of
SFAS No. 141, which applied only to business combinations in which control was obtained by
transferring consideration. In general, SFAS No. 141(R) requires the acquiring entity in a
business combination to recognize the fair value of all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date as the fair value measurement point; and
modifies the disclosure requirements. This Statement applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. However, starting fiscal 2009, accounting for changes in
valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets and the resolution of uncertain tax positions
for prior business combinations will impact tax expense instead of goodwill. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of this Statement on the Companys financial results of operations
and financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FAS 115. This Statement details the disclosures
required for items measured at fair value. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not
affect the Companys financial results of operations or financial position as the Company did not
elect the fair value option for its eligible financial assets or liabilities.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This Statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
Relative to SFAS No. 157, the FASB issued FSP Nos. 157-1 and 157-2. FSP No. 157-1 amends SFAS No.
157 to exclude SFAS No. 13 and its related interpretive accounting pronouncements that address
leasing transactions. FSP No. 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed
at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157,
as amended, with the exception of the application of the Statement to non-recurring non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a significant
impact on the Companys financial results of operations or financial position. See Note 15, Fair
Value Measurements, for further discussion.
21
Avery Dennison Corporation
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION
Managements Discussion and Analysis provides a narrative concerning our financial performance and
condition that should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements. It
includes the following sections:
|
|
|
|
|
Definition of Terms |
|
|
22 |
|
Overview and Outlook |
|
|
22 |
|
Analysis of Results of Operations for the Third Quarter |
|
|
26 |
|
Results of Operations by Segment for the Third Quarter |
|
|
27 |
|
Analysis of Results of Operations for the Nine Months Year-to-Date |
|
|
29 |
|
Results of Operations by Segment for the Nine Months Year-to-Date |
|
|
31 |
|
Financial Condition |
|
|
33 |
|
Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures |
|
|
38 |
|
Recent Accounting Requirements |
|
|
38 |
|
Safe Harbor Statement |
|
|
38 |
|
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America, or GAAP. Our discussion of financial results includes
several non-GAAP measures to provide additional information concerning Avery Dennison Corporations
(the Companys) performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, nor
are they a substitute for, GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are intended
to supplement our presentation of our financial results that are prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Refer to Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures.
We use the following terms:
|
|
Organic sales growth (decline) refers to the change in sales excluding the estimated impact
of currency translation, acquisitions and divestitures; |
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss) refers to income before interest and taxes; |
|
|
|
Free cash flow refers to cash flow from operations and net proceeds from sale of
investments, less payments for capital expenditures, software and other deferred charges; |
|
|
|
Operational working capital refers to trade accounts receivable and inventories, net of
accounts payable. |
Change in Accounting Method
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007, we changed our method of accounting for inventories for
our U.S. operations from a combination of the use of the first-in, first-out (FIFO) and the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) methods to the FIFO method. The inventories for our international
operations continue to be valued using the FIFO method. We believe the change is preferable as the
FIFO method better reflects the current value of inventories on the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet; provides better matching of revenue and expense in the unaudited
Consolidated Statement of Income; provides uniformity across our operations with respect to the
method for inventory accounting; and enhances comparability with peers. Furthermore, this
application of the FIFO method is consistent with our accounting of inventories for U.S. income tax
purposes.
The discussion that follows reflects our results that have been restated due to the accounting
change.
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
Overview
Sales
Our sales increased 3% and 13% in the first three and nine months of 2008, respectively, reflecting
the factors summarized in the table below:
22
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
Estimated change in sales due to: |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
Organic sales growth (decline) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
1 |
% |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Acquisitions, net of divestitures |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Reported sales growth (1) |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Totals may not sum due to rounding |
On an organic basis, the decline of 2% in the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008 was
primarily due to declines in economic conditions in mature markets, partially offset by growth in
emerging markets.
Net Income
Net income decreased $0.6 million, or 0.3%, in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007.
Negative factors affecting the change in net income included:
|
|
|
Cost inflation, including raw material and energy costs |
|
|
|
|
Incremental interest expense and amortization of intangibles related to the acquisition
of Paxar Corporation (Paxar) |
|
|
|
|
The carryover effect of a more competitive pricing environment in the roll materials
business in the prior year, partially offset by current year price increases |
Positive factors affecting the change in net income included:
|
|
|
Cost savings from productivity improvement initiatives, including savings from
restructuring actions |
|
|
|
|
Benefit from foreign currency translation and acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
Lower transition costs related to the integration of Paxar |
|
|
|
|
Lower asset impairment and restructuring charges related to cost reduction actions |
|
|
|
|
Lower effective tax rate |
Acquisitions
We completed the Paxar acquisition on June 15, 2007. The combination of the Paxar business into
our Retail Information Services segment increases our presence in the retail information and brand
identification market, combines complementary strengths and broadens the range of our product and
service capabilities, improves our ability to meet customer demands for product innovation and
improved quality of service, and facilitates expansion into new product and geographic segments.
The integration of the acquisition into our operations is also expected to result in significant
cost synergies. Refer to the Outlook section herein for further information.
We completed the acquisition of DM Label Group (DM Label) on April 1, 2008. DM Label operations
are included in our Retail Information Services segment.
See Note 2, Acquisitions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
further information.
Paxar Acquisition-related Actions
The following integration actions result in headcount reductions of approximately 1,695 positions
in our Retail Information Services segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paxar |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition- |
|
Headcount |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
related costs(1) |
|
Reduction |
|
2007 Restructuring (2) |
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
2007 Transition costs (2) |
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Restructuring (2) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
2008 Transition costs (2) |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Purchase price adjustments |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
2008 Purchase price adjustments |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
Total Paxar integration actions |
|
$ |
124.2 |
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
Change-in-control costs (Purchase
price adjustment) |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Paxar acquisition-related costs |
|
$ |
152.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes severance, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges, where
applicable |
|
(2) |
|
Recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income |
23
Avery Dennison Corporation
Cost synergies resulting from the integration of Paxar were approximately $20 million in 2007 and
approximately $52 million incrementally in the first nine months of 2008. Incremental cost
synergies expected to be achieved through the balance of the integration are discussed in the
Outlook section below.
Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions and Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions, to the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
Cost Reduction Actions
In addition to cost synergies from the integration of Paxar discussed above, cost reduction actions
initiated from late 2006 through the end of 2007 (see table below) are expected to yield annualized
pretax savings of $45 million to $50 million. Savings from these actions, net of transition costs,
were approximately $5 million in 2007 and approximately $28 million in the first nine months of
2008. Incremental savings associated with these actions in the fourth quarter of 2008 are expected
to be approximately $4 million, with the balance expected to be realized in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
Headcount |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Expense(1) |
|
|
Reduction |
|
|
Q4 2006 restructuring |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
2007 restructuring (excluding Paxar
integration-related actions) |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
Total Q4 2006-2007 restructuring actions |
|
$ |
31.4 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes severance, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges, where
applicable |
We are undertaking additional restructuring actions in 2008, in addition to Paxar
acquisition-related actions. The 2008 actions identified to date (see table below) are expected to
yield annualized savings of approximately $20 million, most of which is expected to benefit 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
Headcount |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Expense(1) |
|
|
Reduction |
|
|
Q1 2008 restructuring |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Q2 2008 restructuring |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
Q3 2008 restructuring |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
Total 2008 restructuring actions |
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes severance, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges, where
applicable |
See Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for further information.
Effective Rate of Taxes on Income
The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2008 was approximately 8%, compared with
approximately 19% for the same period in 2007. The effective tax rate for the first nine months of
2008 includes the recognition of tax benefits of approximately $37 million due to discrete events.
Discrete events include a benefit of approximately $42 million for the increased realizability of
deferred tax assets, a net benefit of approximately $3 million of infrequent tax benefits and
return filing adjustments, and a detriment of approximately $8 million from tax contingency
accruals. Refer to Note 12, Taxes Based on Income, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information.
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow, which is a non-GAAP measure, refers to cash flow from operating activities and net
proceeds from sale of investments, less spending on property, plant, equipment, software and other
deferred charges. We use free cash flow as a measure of funds available for other corporate
purposes, such as dividends, debt reduction, acquisitions, and repurchases of common stock.
Management believes that this measure provides meaningful supplemental information to our investors
to assist them in their financial analysis of the Company. Management believes that it is
appropriate to measure cash flow (including net proceeds from sale of investments) after spending
on property, plant, equipment, software and other deferred charges because such spending is
considered integral to maintaining or expanding our underlying business. This measure is not
intended to represent the residual cash available for discretionary purposes. Refer to the Uses
and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures section for further information regarding
limitations of this measure.
24
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(In millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
382.3 |
|
|
$ |
305.6 |
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(97.8 |
) |
|
|
(136.3 |
) |
Purchase of software and other deferred charges |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
(39.9 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments, net (1) |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
251.5 |
|
|
$ |
129.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net proceeds from sale of investments are related to the sale of securities held by
our captive insurance company and other investments. |
In the first nine months of 2008, free cash flow increased primarily due to increased cash flow
provided by operating activities and reduced capital spending targets consistent with current
economic conditions. See Analysis of Results of Operations and Liquidity sections below for
more information.
Investigations
We previously announced that we had been notified by the European Commission (EC), the United
States Department of Justice (DOJ), the Competition Law Department of the Department of Justice
of Canada and the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission of their respective
investigations into competitive practices in the label stock industry. We cooperated with all of
these investigations, and all have been
terminated without further action by the authorities.
We are a named defendant in purported class actions in the U.S. seeking treble damages and other
relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, which were filed after the announcement of the
DOJ investigation.
As disclosed, we have discovered instances of conduct by certain employees that potentially violate
the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We reported that conduct to authorities in the U.S. and we
believe it is possible that fines or other penalties may be incurred.
We are unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect could be
adverse and material. These and other matters are reported in Note 16, Commitments and
Contingencies, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Outlook
Certain statements contained in this section are forward-looking statements and are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties. Refer to our Safe Harbor Statement herein.
Recent
market and economic conditions have been volatile and challenging with tighter credit
conditions and slower growth through the third quarter of 2008. We
are not able to predict the
duration and severity of the current disruption in financial markets and adverse economic
conditions in the U.S. and other countries.
For the full year of 2008, we expect high single-digit revenue growth, including the benefit from
our recent acquisitions and a favorable effect from foreign currency translation based on current
exchange rates. On an organic basis, we expect sales to decline approximately 2% for the full year
of 2008. On an organic basis, we expect sales in the fourth quarter to decline at a rate greater
than the decline in the first nine months of 2008.
We estimate the total annual cost synergies associated with the Paxar integration to be
approximately $120 million, of which $20 million benefited 2007 and an incremental $52 million
benefited the first nine months of 2008. To accomplish our synergy target, we expect to incur
aggregate pretax cash costs in the range of $165 million to $180 million, of which approximately
$75 million was incurred in 2007 and approximately $50 million was incurred in the first nine
months of 2008.
In addition to the synergies resulting from the Paxar integration described above, we anticipate
our prior year restructuring and business realignment efforts to yield incremental savings in 2008
of $30 million to $35 million, net of transition costs. Restructuring actions implemented in the
first nine months of 2008 are expected to yield savings of approximately $20 million, most of which
is expected to benefit 2009.
25
Avery Dennison Corporation
We expect the above benefits to be more than offset by higher costs, including those related to raw
material and energy, as well as investments for future growth.
We anticipate price increases and productivity improvements in 2008 to partially offset raw
material and other cost inflation.
We estimate interest expense in 2008 to be in the range of $115 million to $120 million,
approximately $10 million to $15 million higher than 2007, due to acquisition-related debt. Our
estimate is subject to changes in average debt outstanding and changes in market rates associated
with the portion of our debt tied to variable interest rates.
The annual effective tax rate, expected to be in the range of 8% to 10% for 2008, will be impacted
by future events including changes in tax laws, geographic income mix, tax audits, closure of tax
years, legal entity restructuring, and the release of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets.
The effective tax rate can potentially have wide variances from quarter to quarter, resulting from
interim reporting requirements and the recognition of discrete events.
We anticipate our capital and software expenditures to be approximately $180 million in 2008. This
includes one-time cash costs associated with capital expenditures to integrate Paxar (included in
the cash cost estimate discussed above), of which approximately $14 million was incurred in the
first nine months of 2008.
Reflecting the foregoing assumptions, we expect an increase in annual earnings and free cash flow
in 2008 in comparison with 2007.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER
Income Before Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,724.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,680.4 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1,290.5 |
|
|
|
1,214.2 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
434.3 |
|
|
|
466.2 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
325.5 |
|
|
|
330.4 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
67.3 |
|
|
$ |
66.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (margin) |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
Sales
Sales increased 3% in the third quarter of 2008 compared to the same period last year. Foreign
currency translation had a favorable impact on the change in sales of approximately $76 million in
the third quarter of 2008. The acquisition of DM Label increased sales by approximately $10
million in the third quarter of 2008.
On an organic basis, the decline of approximately 2% in the third quarter of 2008 compared to the
same period last year was primarily due to declines in economic conditions in mature markets,
partially offset by growth in emerging markets.
Refer to Results of Operations by Segment for further information on segments.
Gross Profit
Gross profit margin for the third quarter of 2008 declined compared to the same period in 2007, as
savings from prior year restructuring and other sources of productivity and benefits from pricing
actions were more than offset by raw material and other cost inflation and reduced fixed cost
leverage on an organic basis.
Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses
The decrease in marketing, general and administrative expense in the third quarter of 2008 compared
to the same period last year primarily reflected benefits from productivity improvements and lower
net transition costs associated with the Paxar integration, partially offset by the negative
effects of foreign currency (approximately $10 million), higher employee costs, costs associated
with the recently acquired DM Label business and related integration costs (totaling approximately
$5 million), and incremental amortization of intangibles (approximately $2 million).
26
Avery Dennison Corporation
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, pretax) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
Asset impairment and lease cancellation charges |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Asset impairment charges acquisition integration-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
In the third quarter of 2008, Other expense, net consisted of severance and other
employee-related costs of $8.7 million and asset impairment and lease cancellation charges of $3.8
million (primarily in the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment). Restructuring costs in the third
quarter of 2008 relate to a reduction in headcount of approximately 310 positions across all
segments and geographic regions.
In the third quarter of 2007, Other expense, net consisted of asset impairment charges of $21.3
million (including $8.9 million related to the integration of Paxar) and severance and other
employee-related costs of $7.5 million, as well as certain non-recurring financing costs of $4.8
million. The restructuring costs in the third quarter of 2007 related to a reduction in headcount
of approximately 230 positions across all segments and geographic regions.
Refer to Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for more information.
Net Income and Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
67.3 |
|
|
$ |
66.5 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
62.7 |
|
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
.64 |
|
|
$ |
.60 |
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
$ |
.63 |
|
|
$ |
.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as a percent of sales |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
(31.5 |
)% |
Net income per common share |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(30.2 |
) |
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2008 was approximately 7%, compared with
approximately 12% for the same period in 2007. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of
2008 includes the recognition of tax benefits of approximately $9 million due to discrete events.
Discrete events include a benefit of approximately $9 million for the increased realizability of
deferred tax assets, a net benefit of approximately $3 million of infrequent tax benefits and
return filing adjustments, and a detriment of approximately $3 million from tax contingency
accruals. Refer to Note 12, Taxes Based on Income, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT FOR THE THIRD QUARTER
Pressure-sensitive Materials Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
982.3 |
|
|
$ |
911.4 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
46.1 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
936.2 |
|
|
$ |
868.3 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes lease
cancellation charges in 2008 and
restructuring costs and asset impairment
charges
in both years |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
27
Avery Dennison Corporation
Net Sales
Sales in our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment increased 8% in the third quarter of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007, reflecting the favorable impact of foreign currency
translation (approximately $55 million) and organic sales growth of approximately 1%.
On an organic basis, sales in our roll materials business in Europe in the third quarter of 2008
remained flat compared to the same period last year. Market expansion in our roll materials
business contributed to double-digit organic growth in Asia and high single-digit organic growth in
Latin America. Largely offsetting this growth, our North American roll materials business declined
at a low single-digit rate (excluding intercompany sales).
On an organic basis, sales in our graphics and reflective business declined at a mid single-digit
rate, primarily reflecting lower promotional spending on graphic products by businesses in response
to weak market conditions.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the third quarter of 2008 reflected raw material and other cost
inflation and negative product mix, partially offset by the benefits of price increases, higher
unit volume, and cost savings from restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives.
Operating income for the quarter included restructuring costs and asset impairment charges in both
years, and lease cancellation charges in 2008.
Retail Information Services Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
379.6 |
|
|
$ |
389.3 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
379.1 |
|
|
$ |
388.7 |
|
Operating income (loss) (1) (2) |
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes integration-related software impairment charges in
2007 and restructuring costs in both years |
|
$ |
.8 |
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
(2) Includes transition costs related to acquisition integrations |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our Retail Information Services segment decreased 2% in the third quarter of 2008 compared
to the same period last year, reflecting lower sales on an organic basis, partially offset by sales
from the DM Label acquisition (approximately $10 million) and the favorable impact of foreign
currency translation (approximately $9 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 7% in the
third quarter of 2008 due to a decline in orders for apparel shipped to North American retailers
and brand owners, partially offset by increased sales for the European retail market. Growth in
the European retail market weakened sequentially from previous quarters.
Operating Income
Lower operating loss in the third quarter of 2008 reflected incremental synergies and lower
transition costs related to the Paxar integration, and savings from restructuring and productivity
improvement initiatives, partially offset by lower sales, raw material and other cost inflation,
and incremental amortization of acquisition intangibles. Operating income for the quarter included
restructuring costs in both years, and integration-related software impairment charges in 2007.
Office and Consumer Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
260.8 |
|
|
$ |
267.2 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
260.4 |
|
|
$ |
266.9 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes asset impairment
charges in 2008, lease cancellation charges
in 2007, and restructuring costs
in both
years |
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
.5 |
|
|
28
Avery Dennison Corporation
Net Sales
Sales in our Office and Consumer Products segment decreased 2% in the third quarter of 2008
compared to the same period last year, reflecting lower sales on an organic basis, partially offset
by the favorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $6 million). On an organic
basis, sales declined 4% as the benefit from the delay in orders related to back-to-school season
from the second quarter to the third quarter was more than offset by weak end market demand.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the third quarter of 2008 reflected lower sales and cost inflation,
partially offset by savings from restructuring actions and other productivity improvement
initiatives. Operating income for the quarter included restructuring costs in both years, asset
impairment charges in 2008, and lease cancellation charges in 2007.
Other specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
156.1 |
|
|
|
$ 161.8 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
149.1 |
|
|
|
$ 156.5 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes asset impairment charges in 2007 and restructuring costs in both years |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our other specialty converting businesses decreased 5% in the third quarter of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. Reported sales growth included the favorable impact of
foreign currency translation (approximately $6 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 8% in
the third quarter of 2008, reflecting lower volume in automotive and housing construction, and the
negative effect of exiting certain low-margin products in our specialty tape business, partially
offset by growth in our radio-frequency identification (RFID) division.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the third quarter of 2008 reflected lower sales and cost inflation,
partially offset by the benefit of productivity improvement initiatives and a reduction in
operating loss in our RFID division. Operating income for the quarter included restructuring costs
in both years, and asset impairment charges in 2007.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS YEAR-TO-DATE
Income Before Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
5,198.9 |
|
|
$ |
4,593.8 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
3,850.3 |
|
|
|
3,352.9 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,348.6 |
|
|
|
1,240.9 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
994.5 |
|
|
|
849.5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
242.4 |
|
|
$ |
277.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (margin) |
|
|
25.9 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
Marketing, general and administrative expense |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
Sales
Sales increased approximately 13% in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the same period in
the prior year. Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact on the change in sales of
approximately $248 million in the first nine months of 2008. The acquisition of DM Label increased
sales by approximately $26 million in the first nine months of 2008.
29
Avery Dennison Corporation
On an organic basis, the decline of approximately 2% in the first nine months of 2008 was primarily
due to declines in economic conditions in mature markets, partially offset by growth in emerging
markets.
Refer to Results of Operations by Segment for further information on segments.
Gross Profit
Gross profit margin for the first nine months of 2008 declined compared to the same period last
year, as higher gross profit margin associated with sales from the Paxar acquisition and savings
from prior year restructuring and other sources of productivity were more than offset by the
carryover effect of prior year price competition in the roll materials business, higher raw
material and other cost
inflation, and negative product mix shifts (lower sales of higher gross profit margin products), as
well as reduced fixed cost leverage on an organic basis.
Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses
The increase in marketing, general and administrative expense in the first nine months of 2008
compared to the same period last year primarily reflected costs associated with the recently
acquired businesses (totaling approximately $122 million, including $13 million in incremental
amortization of intangibles), the negative effects of foreign currency (approximately $22 million),
as well as higher employee costs, partially offset by the benefits from productivity improvement
initiatives and lower net transition costs related to the recent acquisitions.
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, pretax) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
Asset impairment and lease cancellation charges |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Asset impairment charges acquisition integration-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
43.2 |
|
|
In the first nine months of 2008, Other expense, net consisted of severance and other
employee-related costs of $19.2 million and asset impairment and lease cancellation charges of $9.2
million, partially offset by ($4.5) million related to a gain on sale of investments.
Restructuring costs in the first nine months of 2008 relate to a reduction in headcount of
approximately 775 positions across all segments and geographic regions.
In the first nine months of 2007, Other expense, net consisted of asset impairment charges of
$30.8 million (including $18.4 million related to the integration of Paxar) and severance and other
employee-related costs of $10.5 million. Restructuring charges in the first nine months of 2007
related to a reduction in headcount of approximately 325 positions.
The other items included in Other expense, net in 2007 included:
|
|
|
certain non-recurring financing costs of $4.8 million |
|
|
|
|
reversal of an accrual related to a lawsuit of ($3.2) million |
|
|
|
|
expenses related to a divestiture of $.3 million |
Refer to Note 10, Cost Reduction Actions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for more information.
Net Income and Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
242.4 |
|
|
$ |
277.3 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
223.5 |
|
|
$ |
224.1 |
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as a percent of sales |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
(.3 |
)% |
|
|
(16.5 |
)% |
Net income per common share |
|
|
(.4 |
) |
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
Net income per common share, assuming dilution |
|
|
(.4 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
30
Avery Dennison Corporation
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2008 was 8%, compared with 19% for the same
period in 2007. The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2008 includes the recognition
of tax benefits of approximately $37 million due to discrete events. Discrete events include a
benefit of approximately $42 million for the increased realizability of deferred tax assets, a net
benefit of approximately $3 million of infrequent tax benefits and return filing adjustments, and a
detriment of approximately $8 million from tax contingency accruals. Refer to Note 12, Taxes
Based on Income, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT FOR THE NINE MONTHS YEAR-TO-DATE
Pressure-sensitive Materials Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
2,968.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,727.2 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
132.7 |
|
|
|
119.6 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,835.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,607.6 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
210.5 |
|
|
|
239.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes lease
cancellation charges in 2008,
reversal of an accrual related to a
lawsuit in 2007, and restructuring
costs and asset impairment charges in
both years |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment increased 9% in the first nine months of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007, reflecting the favorable impact of foreign currency
translation (approximately $185 million) and organic sales growth of approximately 2%.
On an organic basis, sales in our roll materials business in Europe in the first nine months of
2008 grew at a low single-digit rate compared to the same period last year. Market expansion in
our roll materials business contributed to double-digit organic growth in Asia, and mid
single-digit organic growth in Latin America. Largely offsetting this growth, our North American
roll materials business declined at a low single-digit rate (excluding intercompany sales).
On an organic basis, sales in our graphics and reflective business declined at a mid single-digit
rate, primarily reflecting lower promotional spending on graphic products by businesses in response
to weak market conditions.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the first nine months of 2008 reflected the negative effects of cost
inflation and prior year price reductions, which more than offset the initial benefits of recent
price increases, as well as negative product mix, partially offset by higher unit volume, and cost
savings from restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives. Operating income for the nine
month period included restructuring costs and asset impairment charges in both years, lease
cancellation charges in 2008, and reversal of an accrual related to a lawsuit in 2007.
Retail Information Services Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
1,191.1 |
|
|
$ |
766.0 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,189.3 |
|
|
$ |
764.6 |
|
Operating income (loss) (1)(2) |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes integration-related software impairment charges in 2007, asset
impairment and lease cancellation charges in 2008, and restructuring costs in both years |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
(2) Includes transition costs related to acquisition integrations, primarily Paxar |
|
$ |
17.9 |
|
|
$ |
26.2 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our Retail Information Services segment increased 56% in the first nine months of 2008
compared to the same period last year,
31
Avery Dennison Corporation
reflecting the Paxar and DM Label acquisitions, which
increased sales by an estimated $415 million and $26 million, respectively, and the favorable
impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $22 million). On an organic basis, sales
declined 4% in the first nine months of 2008 due to a decline in orders for apparel shipped to
North American retailers and brand owners, partially offset by increased sales for the European
retail market.
Operating Income
Increased operating income in the first nine months of 2008 reflected higher sales, incremental
synergies and lower transition costs related to the Paxar integration, and savings from
restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives, partially offset by raw material and other
cost inflation, and incremental amortization of acquisition intangibles. Operating income for the
nine month period included restructuring costs in both years, asset impairment and lease
cancellation charges in 2008, and integration-related software impairment charges in 2007.
Office and Consumer Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
711.2 |
|
|
$ |
745.2 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
710.2 |
|
|
$ |
744.0 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
102.5 |
|
|
|
117.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes asset impairment in
2008, lease cancellation charges and
expenses related to a divestiture in 2007,
and restructuring costs in both years |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our Office and Consumer Products segment decreased 5% in the first nine months of 2008
compared to the same period last year, reflecting lower sales on an organic basis, partially offset
by the favorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $21 million). On an organic
basis, sales declined 7% due to customer inventory reductions (an estimated $18 million) and weak
end market demand.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the first nine months of 2008 reflected lower sales and cost
inflation, partially offset by savings from restructuring actions and other productivity
improvement initiatives. Operating income for the nine month period included restructuring costs
and asset impairment charges in both years, and lease cancellation charges and expenses related to
a divestiture in 2007.
Other specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net sales including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
485.5 |
|
|
$ |
492.0 |
|
Less intersegment sales |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
463.7 |
|
|
$ |
477.6 |
|
Operating income (1) |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes asset impairment charges in 2007 and restructuring costs in both years |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
Net Sales
Sales in our other specialty converting businesses decreased 3% in the first nine months of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. Reported sales growth included the favorable impact of
foreign currency translation (approximately $20 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 7%
in the first nine months of 2008, reflecting lower volumes in automotive and housing construction,
and the negative effect of exiting certain low-margin products in our specialty tape business,
partially offset by growth in our RFID division.
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in the first nine months of 2008 reflected lower sales and cost
inflation, partially offset by the benefit of productivity improvement initiatives and a reduction
in operating loss in our RFID division. Operating income in the first nine months of 2008 included
restructuring costs in both years, and asset impairment charges in 2007.
32
Avery Dennison Corporation
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Liquidity
Cash Flow Provided by Operating Activities for the First Nine Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
223.5 |
|
|
$ |
224.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
210.5 |
|
|
|
171.9 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Asset impairment and net loss on sale and disposal of assets |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
Other non-cash items, net |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities and other adjustments |
|
|
(96.3 |
) |
|
|
(138.6 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
382.3 |
|
|
$ |
305.6 |
|
|
For cash flow purposes, changes in assets and liabilities exclude the impact of foreign currency
translation, the impact of acquisitions and certain non-cash transactions (discussed in the
Analysis of Selected Balance Sheet Accounts section below).
In the first nine months of 2008, cash flow provided by operating activities increased
approximately $77 million compared to the same
period in 2007, primarily due to improved payment terms on accounts payable, decreases in purchases
and better management of inventory during the period, partially offset by higher material costs.
Cash Flow Used in Investing Activities for the First Nine Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
(97.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(136.3 |
) |
Purchase of software and other deferred charges |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
(39.9 |
) |
Payments for acquisitions |
|
|
(130.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,285.2 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments, net |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(254.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,458.8 |
) |
|
Payments for Acquisitions
On April 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of DM Label, which is included in our Retail
Information Services segment.
On June 15, 2007, we completed the acquisition of Paxar. In accordance with the terms of the
acquisition agreement, each outstanding share of Paxar common stock, par value $0.10 was converted
into the right to receive $30.50 in cash. The total purchase price for this transaction was
approximately $1.33 billion, including transaction costs of approximately $15 million.
Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information.
Capital Spending
Significant capital projects during the first nine months of 2008 included investments for
expansion in China and India serving both our materials and retail information services businesses.
Significant information technology projects during the first nine months of 2008 included customer
service and standardization initiatives.
Proceeds from Sale of Investments
Net proceeds from sale of investments are related to the sale of securities primarily held by our
captive insurance company.
Cash Flow Used in Financing Activities for the First Nine Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net change in borrowings and payments of debt |
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,330.0 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(131.4 |
) |
|
|
(128.0 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(63.2 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
(117.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,170.7 |
|
|
33
Avery Dennison Corporation
Borrowings and Repayment of Debt
In February 2008, one of our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement for a term loan credit
facility with fifteen domestic and foreign banks for a total commitment of $400 million, which we
guaranteed, maturing February 8, 2011. Financing available under the agreement is permitted to be
used for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including acquisitions. The term
loan credit facility typically bears interest at an annual rate of, at the subsidiarys option,
either (i) between LIBOR plus 0.300% and LIBOR plus 0.850%, depending on the Companys debt ratings
by either Standard & Poors Rating Service (S&P) or Moodys Investors Service (Moodys), or
(ii) the higher of (A) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (B) the prime rate. We used the term
loan credit facility to reduce commercial paper borrowings previously issued to fund the
acquisition of Paxar. The term loan credit facility is subject to customary financial covenants,
including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
During the first nine months of 2007, we increased our short-term borrowings to initially fund the
Paxar acquisition transaction. Additionally, proceeds from borrowings were used to support
seasonal operational requirements and share repurchases.
Shareholders Equity
Our shareholders equity was approximately $2.10 billion at September 27, 2008 compared to
approximately $1.91 billion at September 29, 2007. Our dividend per share increased to $1.23 in
the first nine months of 2008 from $1.20 in the first nine months of 2007.
Share Repurchases
During the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, we repurchased approximately .2 million shares
totaling $9.8 million, and approximately .8 million shares totaling $52 million, respectively. We
also made cash payments of $11 million related to shares repurchased in 2006, but settled in 2007.
Analysis of Selected Balance Sheet Accounts
Long-lived Assets
Goodwill increased approximately $92 million during the first nine months of 2008 due to
preliminarily identified goodwill associated with the DM Label acquisition (approximately $67
million), foreign currency translation (approximately $17 million), and purchase price adjustments
(approximately $8 million) associated with the Paxar acquisition.
Other intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions decreased approximately $16 million
during the first nine months of 2008, which reflected normal amortization expense (approximately
$25 million), partially offset by incremental adjustments to intangible assets for the Paxar
acquisition (approximately $8 million) and the impact of foreign currency translation
(approximately $1 million).
Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information.
Other assets increased approximately $14 million during the first nine months of 2008 due primarily
to purchases of software and other deferred charges, net of related amortization (approximately $21
million) and the impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $1 million), partially
offset by a change in long-term pension assets (approximately $3 million), a decrease in the cash
surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance (approximately $3 million), and sales and/or
disposals of software and other deferred charges (approximately $2 million).
Other Shareholders Equity Accounts
The value of our employee stock benefit trusts decreased approximately $70 million during the first
nine months of 2008 due to a decrease in the market value of shares held in the trust of
approximately $63 million, and the issuance of shares under our employee stock option and incentive
plans having a value of approximately $7 million.
Impact of Foreign Currency Translation for the First Nine Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change in net sales |
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
Change in net income |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
International operations generated approximately 67% of our net sales in the first nine months of
2008. Our future results are subject to changes in political and economic conditions and the
impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates.
The benefit to sales from currency translation in the first nine months of 2008 primarily reflected
a benefit from sales denominated in Euros and Swiss Francs, as well as sales in the currencies of
China, Brazil, and Australia, partially offset by a negative impact of sales in the currencies of
South Korea, Great Britain and South Africa.
34
Avery Dennison Corporation
Effect of Foreign Currency Transactions
The impact on net income from transactions denominated in foreign currencies may be mitigated
because the costs of our products are generally denominated in the same currencies in which they
are sold. In addition, to reduce our income statement exposure to transactions in foreign
currencies, we may enter into foreign exchange forward, option and swap contracts, where available
and appropriate.
Analysis of Selected Financial Ratios
We utilize certain financial ratios to assess our financial condition and operating performance, as
discussed below.
Operational Working Capital Ratio
Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities), as a percent of annualized net sales,
changed in 2008 primarily due to the impact of the Paxar acquisition, a decrease in short-term
debt, as well as an increase in other receivables and refundable and deferred income taxes,
partially offset by an increase in accounts payable, accrued payroll and benefits, and income taxes
payable.
Operational working capital, as a percent of annualized net sales, is a non-GAAP measure and is
shown below. We use this non-GAAP measure as a tool to assess our working capital requirements
because it excludes the impact of fluctuations due to our financing and other activities (that
affect cash and cash equivalents, deferred taxes and other current assets and other current
liabilities) that tend to be disparate in amount and timing and therefore, may increase the
volatility of the working capital ratio from period to period. Additionally, the items excluded
from this measure are not necessarily indicative of the underlying trends of our operations and are
not significantly influenced by the day-to-day activities that are managed at the operating level.
Refer to Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures. Our objective is to minimize our investment
in operational working capital, as a percentage of sales, by reducing this ratio to maximize cash
flow and return on investment.
Operational Working Capital for the First Nine Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(A) Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
$ |
(790.1 |
) |
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(81.3 |
) |
|
|
(77.3 |
) |
Current deferred and refundable income taxes and other current assets |
|
|
(286.2 |
) |
|
|
(231.2 |
) |
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
721.6 |
|
|
|
1,572.3 |
|
Current deferred and payable income taxes and other current liabilities |
|
|
673.2 |
|
|
|
635.5 |
|
|
(B) Operational working capital |
|
$ |
1,038.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,109.2 |
|
|
(C) Annualized net sales (year-to-date sales divided by 3, multiplied by 4) |
|
$ |
6,931.9 |
|
|
$ |
6,125.1 |
|
|
Working capital, as a percent of annualized net sales (A) ¸ (C) |
|
|
.2 |
% |
|
|
(12.9 |
)% |
|
Operational working capital, as a percent of annualized net sales (B) ¸ (C) |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
As a percent of annualized sales, operational working capital in the first nine months of 2008
decreased compared to the same period in the prior year. The primary factors contributing to this
change, which includes the impact of the Paxar acquisition and currency translation, are discussed
below.
Accounts Receivable Ratio
The average number of days sales outstanding was 61 days in the first nine months of 2008 compared
to 63 days in the first nine months of 2007, calculated using the three-quarter average trade
accounts receivable balance divided by the average daily sales for the first nine months. The
current year average number of days sales outstanding was impacted by a decrease in sales,
partially offset by changes in payment terms with our customers. The prior year average number of
days sales outstanding was impacted primarily by the Paxar acquisition in June 2007.
Inventory Ratio
Average inventory turnover was 7.8 in the first nine months of 2008 compared to 7.3 in the first
nine months of 2007, calculated using the annualized cost of sales (cost of sales for the first
nine months divided by 3, and multiplied by 4) divided by the three-quarter average inventory
balance for the first nine months. The change is primarily due to improved inventory management,
partially offset by higher material costs. The prior year average inventory turnover was primarily
impacted by the Paxar acquisition in June 2007.
Accounts Payable Ratio
The average number of days payable outstanding was 54 days in the first nine months of 2008
compared to 53 days in the first nine months of 2007, calculated using the three-quarter average
accounts payable balance divided by the average daily cost of products sold
35
Avery Dennison Corporation
for the first nine
months. The current year average number of days payable outstanding was primarily due to improved payment
terms, partially offset by a decrease in purchases. The prior year
average number of days payable outstanding was impacted primarily by the Paxar acquisition in June 2007.
Debt and Shareholders Equity Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
Total debt to total capital |
|
|
51.9 |
% |
|
|
54.9 |
% |
Return on average shareholders equity |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Return on average total capital |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
The decrease in the total debt to total capital ratio was primarily due to an increase in
shareholders equity, as well as a net decrease in debt related to the funding of the Paxar
acquisition in June 2007.
Our various loan agreements in effect as of September 27, 2008 require that we maintain specified
ratios of total debt and interest expense in relation to certain measures of
income. Under the loan agreements, the ratio of total debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, amortization, and other adjustments for the most recent
twelve-month fiscal period
may not exceed 3.5 to 1.0. In addition, earnings before interest, taxes, and other adjustments, as
a ratio to interest for the most recent twelve-month fiscal period may not be less than 3.5 to 1.0.
As of September 27, 2008, we are in compliance with these debt
covenants.
Decreases in the returns on average shareholders equity and total capital in the first nine months
of 2008 compared to the first nine months of 2007 were primarily due to higher equity, partially
offset by lower total debt outstanding. These ratios are computed using annualized net income
(year-to-date net income divided by 3, multiplied by 4) and a three-quarter average denominator for
equity and total debt accounts.
Capital Resources
Capital resources include cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents and debt financing.
At September 27, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $81.3 million held in accounts managed by third party financial institutions. To date, we
have experienced no loss or lack of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, there
is no assurance that access to our invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by
adverse conditions in the financial markets.
Our $1 billion revolving credit facility, which supports our commercial paper programs in the U.S.
and Europe, matures in 2012. Based upon our current outlook for our business and market conditions,
we believe that this facility, in addition to the committed and uncommitted bank lines of credit
maintained in the countries in which we operate, provide the liquidity necessary to fund our
operations. During the recent turmoil in the financial markets, we
did not experience interruptions in
our access to funding.
We have
$50 million of long-term debt maturities in the fourth quarter of 2008 and no long-term
debt maturities in 2009. Our intention is to fund these debt maturities with cash flow from operations and/or commercial paper
borrowings.
We are
exposed to financial market risk resulting from changes in interest
and foreign currency rates, and to
possible liquidity and credit risks of our counterparties.
Capital from Debt
Our total debt increased approximately $11 million in the first nine months of 2008 to
approximately $2.27 billion compared to approximately $2.26 billion at year end 2007, reflecting
primarily an increase in short-term borrowings associated with the DM Label acquisition, partially
offset by a reduction of short-term borrowings used for general operational requirements. Refer to
Borrowings and Repayment of Debt in the Cash Flow Used in Financing Activities section above
for further information.
Credit ratings are a significant factor in our ability to raise short-term and long-term financing.
The credit ratings assigned to us also impact the interest rates on our commercial paper and other
borrowings. When determining a credit rating, the rating agencies place significant weight on our
competitive position, business outlook, consistency of cash flows, debt level and liquidity,
geographic dispersion and management team. We remain committed to retaining a solid investment
grade rating.
36
Avery Dennison Corporation
Our Credit Ratings as of September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Outlook |
|
|
Standard & Poors Rating Service (S&P) |
|
|
A-2 |
|
|
BBB+ |
|
Negative |
Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) |
|
|
P2 |
|
|
Baa1 |
|
Negative |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Other Matters
Industry Investigations
We previously announced that we had been notified by the European Commission, the United States
Department of Justice (DOJ), the Competition Law Department of the Department of Justice of
Canada and the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission of their respective investigations into
competitive practices in the label stock industry. We cooperated with all of these investigations,
and all have been terminated without further action by the authorities.
We are a named defendant in purported class actions in the U.S. seeking treble damages and other
relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, which were filed after the announcement of the
DOJ investigation.
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of independent directors to oversee
the foregoing matters.
We are unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect could be
adverse and material. These and other matters are reported in Note 16, Commitments and
Contingencies, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Environmental
We have been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at nineteen waste disposal or
waste recycling sites, including Paxar sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil and/or groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of
our liability has been agreed upon. We are participating with other PRPs at such sites, and
anticipate that our share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to remedial agreements to be
entered into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other governmental authorities.
We have accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites, including sites in which
governmental agencies have designated us as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will be
incurred and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of
the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future
expense to remediate the currently identified sites and any sites which could be identified in the
future for cleanup could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
As of
September 27, 2008, our estimated accrued liability associated with compliance and remediation costs
was approximately $60 million, including estimated liabilities related to our recent acquisitions.
Other amounts currently accrued are not significant to our consolidated financial position, and
based upon current information, we believe that it is unlikely that the resolution of these matters
will significantly impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Other
In 2005, we contacted relevant authorities in the U.S. and reported the results of an internal
investigation of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The transactions
at issue were carried out by a small number of employees of our reflective business in China, and
involved, among other things, impermissible payments or attempted impermissible payments. The
payments or attempted payments and the contracts associated with them appear to have been
relatively minor in amount and of limited duration. Corrective and disciplinary actions have been
taken. Sales of our reflective business in China in 2005 were approximately $7 million. Based on
findings to date, no changes to our previously filed financial statements are warranted as a result
of these matters. However, we believe that fines or other penalties could be incurred. While we
are unable to predict the financial or operating impact of any such fines or penalties, we believe
that our behavior in detecting, investigating, responding to and voluntarily disclosing these
matters to authorities should be viewed favorably.
In
addition, on or about October 10, 2008, we notified relevant
authorities that we had
discovered questionable payments to certain foreign customs and other regulatory officials by some
employees of our recently acquired companies. These payments do not appear to have been made for
the purpose of obtaining business from any governmental entity. We are in the process of
conducting a review and are taking remedial measures to comply with the provisions of the U.S.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
We provide for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under our basic limited warranty at the
time product revenue is recognized. These costs primarily include materials and labor associated
with the service or sale of products. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the
number of units installed or sold, historical and anticipated rate of warranty claims on those
units, cost per claim to satisfy our warranty obligation and availability of insurance coverage.
As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future
37
Avery Dennison Corporation
expectations, we assess the adequacy of the recorded warranty liability and adjust the amounts as
necessary.
On September 9, 2005, we completed the lease financing for a commercial facility (the Facility)
located in Mentor, Ohio, used primarily for the new headquarters and research center for our roll
materials division. The Facility consists generally of land, buildings, equipment and office
furnishings. We have leased the Facility under an operating lease arrangement, which contains a
residual value guarantee of $33.4 million. We do not expect the residual value of the Facility to
be less than the amount guaranteed.
We participate in international receivable financing programs with several financial institutions
whereby advances may be requested from these financial institutions. Such advances are guaranteed
by us. At September 27, 2008, we had guaranteed approximately $14 million.
As of September 27, 2008, we guaranteed up to approximately $22 million of certain of our foreign
subsidiaries obligations to their suppliers, as well as approximately $573 million of certain of
our subsidiaries lines of credit with various financial institutions.
In November 2007, we issued $400 million of 7.875% Corporate HiMEDS units, a mandatory convertible
debt issue. An additional $40 million of HiMEDS units were issued in December 2007 as a result of
the exercise of the overallotment allocation from the initial issuance. Each HiMEDS unit is
comprised of two components a purchase contract obligating the holder to purchase from us a
certain number of shares of our common stock in 2010 ranging from approximately 6.8 million to
approximately 8.6 million shares (depending on the quoted price per share of our common stock at
that time) and a senior note due in 2020. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately
$427 million, which were used to reduce commercial paper borrowings initially used to finance the
Paxar acquisition.
USES AND LIMITATIONS OF NON-GAAP MEASURES
We use certain non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the impact of certain events, activities or
strategic decisions. The accounting effects of these events, activities or decisions, which are
included in the GAAP measures, may make it difficult to assess the underlying performance of the
Company in a single period. By excluding certain accounting effects, both positive and negative
(e.g. gains on sales of assets, restructuring charges, asset impairments, effects of acquisitions
and related costs, etc.), from certain of our GAAP measures, management believes that it is
providing meaningful supplemental information to facilitate an understanding of the Companys
core or underlying operating results. These non-GAAP measures are used internally to evaluate
trends in our underlying business, as well as to facilitate comparison to the results of
competitors for a single period. We apply the anticipated full-year GAAP tax rate to the non-GAAP
adjustments to determine adjusted non-GAAP net income.
Limitations associated with the use of our non-GAAP measures include: (1) for the calculation of
organic sales growth, the exclusion of foreign currency translation and the impact of acquisitions
and divestitures from reported sales growth; (2) for the calculation of free cash flow, the
exclusion of any mandatory debt service requirements and other uses of the cash generated by
operating activities that do not directly or immediately support the underlying business (such as
discretionary debt reductions, dividends, share repurchase, acquisitions, etc.); (3) for the
calculation of operational working capital, the exclusion of cash and cash equivalents, short-term
debt, deferred taxes, and other current assets and other current liabilities from working capital.
While some of the items the Company excludes from GAAP measures recur, these items tend to be
disparate in amount and timing. Based upon feedback from investors and financial analysts, we
believe that supplemental non-GAAP measures provide information that is useful to the assessment of
the Companys performance and operating trends.
RECENT ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS
During the first nine months of 2008, certain other accounting and financial disclosure
requirements by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC were issued. Refer to Note
18, Recent Accounting Requirements, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for more information.
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
The matters discussed in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and other sections of this Quarterly Report contain forward-looking
statements intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, which are not statements of historical
fact, may contain estimates, assumptions, projections and/or expectations regarding future events,
which may or may not occur. Words such as aim, anticipate, assume, believe, continue,
could, estimate, expect, guidance, intend, may, objective, plan, potential,
project, seek, shall, should, target, will, would, or variations thereof and other
expressions, which refer to future events and trends, identify forward-looking statements. Such
forward-looking statements and financial or other business targets are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results,
performance or achievements of the Company expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
38
Avery Dennison Corporation
Certain of such risks and uncertainties are discussed in more detail in Part II, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, to this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2008 and Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007, and
include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties relating to investment in development
activities and new production facilities; fluctuations in cost and availability of raw materials;
ability of the Company to achieve and sustain targeted cost reductions, including synergies
expected from the integration of the Paxar business in the time and at the cost anticipated;
ability of the Company to generate sustained productivity improvement; successful integration of
acquisitions; successful implementation of new manufacturing technologies and installation of
manufacturing equipment; the financial condition and inventory strategies of customers; customer
and supplier concentrations; changes in customer order patterns; loss of significant contract(s) or
customer(s); timely development and market acceptance of new products; fluctuations in demand
affecting sales to customers; impact of competitive products and pricing; selling prices; business
mix shift; volatility of capital and credit markets; credit risks; ability of the Company to obtain
adequate financing arrangements and to maintain access to capital; fluctuations in interest rates;
fluctuations in pension, insurance and employee benefit costs; impact of legal proceedings,
including previous government investigations into industry competitive practices, and any related
proceedings or lawsuits pertaining thereto or to the subject matter thereof related to the
concluded investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the European Commission, the
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission and the Canadian Department of Justice (including
purported class actions seeking treble damages for alleged unlawful competitive practices, which
were filed after the announcement of the DOJ investigation), as well as the impact of potential
violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; changes in governmental regulations; changes
in political conditions; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and other risks associated
with foreign operations; worldwide and local economic conditions; impact of epidemiological events
on the economy and the Companys customers and suppliers; acts of war, terrorism, natural
disasters; and other factors.
The Company believes that the most significant risk factors that could affect its ability to
achieve its stated financial expectations in the near-term include (1) the impact of economic
conditions on underlying demand for the Companys products; (2) the degree to which higher raw
material and energy-related costs can be passed on to customers through selling price increases,
without a significant loss of volume; (3) the impact of competitors actions, including pricing,
expansion in key markets, and product offerings; (4) potential adverse developments in legal
proceedings and/or investigations regarding competitive activities, including possible fines,
penalties, judgments or settlements; and (5) the ability of the Company to achieve and sustain
targeted cost reductions, including expected synergies associated with the Paxar acquisition.
The Companys forward-looking statements represent judgment only on the dates such statements were
made. By making such forward-looking statements, the Company assumes no duty to update them to
reflect new, changed or unanticipated events or circumstances, other than as may be required by
law.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There are no material changes in the information provided in Part II, Item 7A of the Companys Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys
Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to
apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures.
The Companys disclosure controls system is based upon a global chain of financial and general
business reporting lines that converge in the Companys headquarters in Pasadena, California. As
required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer
and the Companys Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter covered by this report.
39
Avery Dennison Corporation
Based on the foregoing, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
The Company periodically assesses its overall control environment, including the control
environment of acquired businesses.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
40
Avery Dennison Corporation
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company has been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at nineteen waste disposal or
waste recycling sites, including Paxar sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil and/or groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of
the Companys liability has been agreed. The Company is participating with other PRPs at such
sites, and anticipates that its share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to remedial
agreements entered into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other governmental
authorities.
The Company has accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites, including sites in which
governmental agencies have designated the Company as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will
be incurred and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of the
uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future expense
to remediate the currently identified sites and any sites which could be identified in the future
for cleanup could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
As of
September 27, 2008, the Companys estimated accrued liability associated with compliance and
remediation costs was approximately $60 million, including estimated liabilities related to the
Companys recent acquisitions.
Other amounts currently accrued are not significant to the consolidated financial position of the
Company and, based upon current information, management believes it is unlikely that the resolution
of these matters will significantly impact the Companys consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
On August 26, 2008, the Company was notified that the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
had closed its investigation (initiated in August 2005) into the Companys activities in the label
stock industry without further action.
In April 2003, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint challenging the then
proposed merger of UPM-Kymmene (UPM) and the Morgan Adhesives (MACtac) division of Bemis Co.,
Inc. (Bemis). The complaint alleged, among other things, that UPM and [Avery Dennison] have
already attempted to limit competition between themselves, as reflected in written and oral
communications to each other through high level executives regarding explicit anticompetitive
understandings, although the extent to which these efforts have succeeded is not entirely clear to
the United States at the present time. The DOJ concurrently announced a criminal investigation
into competitive practices in the label stock industry. Other investigations into competitive
practices in the label stock industry were subsequently initiated by the European Commission, the
Competition Law Division of the Department of Justice of Canada, and the Australian Competition &
Consumer Commission. The Company cooperated with all of these investigations, and all have
subsequently been terminated without further action by the authorities.
On April 24, 2003, Sentry Business Products, Inc. filed a purported class action on behalf of
direct purchasers of label stock in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois against the Company, UPM, Bemis and certain of their subsidiaries seeking treble damages
and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, essentially repeating the underlying
allegations of the DOJ merger complaint. Ten similar complaints were filed in various federal
district courts. In November 2003, the cases were transferred to the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and consolidated for pretrial purposes. Plaintiffs filed a
consolidated complaint on February 16, 2004, which the Company answered on March 31, 2004. On
April 14, 2004, the court separated the proceedings as to class certification and merits discovery,
and limited the initial phase of discovery to the issue of the appropriateness of class
certification. On January 4, 2006, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On January 20, 2006,
the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint. On August 14, 2006, the plaintiffs moved to
certify a proposed class. The Company and other defendants opposed this motion. On March 1, 2007,
the court heard oral argument on the issue of the appropriateness of class certification. On
August 28, 2007, plaintiffs moved to lift the discovery stay, which the Company opposed. The court
substantively granted class certification on November 19, 2007. The Company filed a petition to
appeal this decision on December 4, 2007, which was denied on March 6, 2008. On July 22, 2008, the
district court held a hearing to set a schedule for merits discovery. The court subsequently
entered an order that requires the parties to complete fact discovery by June 22, 2009.
Dispositive motions are due on March 19, 2010. The Company intends to defend these matters
vigorously.
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles,
California, a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock against the
Company, UPM and UPMs subsidiary Raflatac (Raflatac), seeking treble damages and other relief
for alleged unlawful competitive practices, essentially repeating the underlying allegations of the
DOJ merger complaint. Three similar complaints were filed in various California courts. In
November 2003, on petition from the parties, the California Judicial Council ordered the cases be
coordinated for pretrial purposes. The cases were assigned to a coordination trial judge
41
Avery Dennison Corporation
in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco on March 30, 2004. On September 30,
2004, the Harman Press amended its complaint to add Bemis subsidiary Morgan Adhesives Company
(MACtac) as a defendant. On January 21, 2005, American International Distribution Corporation
filed a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court for
Chittenden County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in
the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on February 16, 2005 in
the District Court of Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a
purported multi-state class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke
County, Tennessee. The Nebraska, Kansas and Vermont cases are currently stayed. Defendants
motion to dismiss the Tennessee case, filed on March 30, 2006, is pending. The Company intends to
defend these matters vigorously.
On August 18, 2005, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission notified two of the Companys
subsidiaries in Australia that it was seeking information in connection with a label stock
investigation. The Company cooperated with the now closed investigation.
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of independent directors to oversee
the foregoing matters.
The Company is unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect
could be adverse and material. These and other matters are reported in Note 16, Commitments and
Contingencies, to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2005, the Company contacted relevant authorities in the U.S. and reported on the results of an
internal investigation of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The
transactions at issue were carried out by a small number of employees of the Companys reflective
business in China, and involved, among other things, impermissible payments or attempted
impermissible payments. The payments or attempted payments and the contracts associated with them
appear to have been relatively minor in amount and of limited duration. Corrective and
disciplinary actions have been taken. Sales of the Companys reflective business in China in 2005
were approximately $7 million. Based on findings to date, no changes to the Companys previously
filed financial statements are warranted as a result of these matters. However, the Company
expects that fines or other penalties could be incurred. While the Company is unable to predict
the financial or operating impact of any such fines or penalties, it believes that its behavior in
detecting, investigating, responding to and voluntarily disclosing these matters to authorities
should be viewed favorably.
In addition, on or about October 10, 2008, the Company notified relevant authorities that it had
discovered questionable payments to certain foreign customs and other regulatory officials by some
employees of its recently acquired companies. These payments do not appear to have been made for
the purpose of obtaining business from any governmental entity. The Company is in the process of
conducting a review and is taking remedial measures to comply with the provisions of the U.S.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits, claims and inquiries, most
of which are routine to the nature of the Companys business. Based upon current information,
management believes that the resolution of these other matters will not materially affect the
Companys financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our ability to attain our goals and objectives is materially dependent on numerous factors and
risks, including but not limited to matters described in Part I, Item 1A, of the Companys Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007. Set forth
below is an update to such
risk factors.
Adverse conditions in the global economy
and disruption of financial markets could negatively
impact our customers, suppliers, and our business.
Financial markets in the United States, Europe and Asia have experienced extreme disruption in
recent months, including, among other things, extreme volatility in security prices, severely
diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades, declines in asset valuations,
inflation, reduced consumer spending, and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. While
currently these conditions have not impaired our ability to access credit markets and finance our
operations, there can be no assurance that there will not be a further deterioration in financial
markets in major economies. These economic developments affect our customers and
our suppliers and businesses such as ours. In addition, they could have a variety of negative effects such as
reduction in revenues, increased costs, lower gross margin
percentages, increased allowances for
doubtful accounts and/or write-offs of accounts receivable, require recognition of impairments of
capitalized assets, including goodwill and other intangibles, and could otherwise have material
adverse effects on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are not able to predict the duration and severity of the current disruption in financial markets
and adverse economic conditions in the U.S. and other countries.
42
Avery Dennison Corporation
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(b) |
|
Not Applicable |
|
(c) |
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer |
The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of shares of the Companys outstanding common
stock. Repurchased shares may be reissued under the Companys stock option and incentive plans or
used for other corporate purposes. Repurchases of equity securities during the third quarter ended
September 27, 2008 are listed in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number |
|
|
Average price |
|
|
Total number of shares |
|
|
Maximum number of shares |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
paid per |
|
|
purchased as part of |
|
|
that may yet be purchased |
|
(Shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
purchased |
|
|
share |
|
|
publicly announced plans |
|
|
under the plans |
|
|
August 24, 2008 -
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
202.7 |
|
|
$ |
48.43 |
|
|
|
202.7 |
|
|
|
3,952 |
|
|
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Information called for in this Item during the period is incorporated by reference to Part II, Item
4 in the Companys Form 10-Q filed on August 7, 2008.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not Applicable
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.1
|
|
Restated Certification of Incorporation, filed August 2, 2002 with the Office of
Delaware Secretary of State, is incorporated by reference to the third quarterly report for
2002 on Form 10-Q, filed November 12, 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.2
|
|
By-laws, as amended, is
incorporated by reference to the current reports on Form 8-K,
filed July 30, 2007 and December 13, 2006 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1
|
|
Avery Dennison Office Products Company Credit Agreement,
amended and restated, is incorporated by reference to the second
quarterly report for 2008 on Form 10-Q, filed August 7, 2008 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.2
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement, amended
and restated, is incorporated by reference to the third quarterly
report for 2007 on Form 10-Q, filed November 7, 2007 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 12
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
D. A. Scarborough Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
D. R. OBryant Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
D. A. Scarborough Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
43
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
D. R. OBryant Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
44
Avery Dennison Corporation
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel R. OBryant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel R. OBryant
Executive Vice President, Finance, and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mitchell R. Butier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell R. Butier
Corporate Vice President, Global Finance, and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 6, 2008 |
|
|
45
exv12
Exhibit 12
Avery Dennison Corporation
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
67.3 |
|
|
$ |
66.5 |
|
|
$ |
242.4 |
|
|
$ |
277.3 |
|
Add: Fixed charges (1) |
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
120.4 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
Amortization of capitalized interest |
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Less: Capitalized interest |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
106.3 |
|
|
$ |
109.7 |
|
|
$ |
360.2 |
|
|
$ |
370.8 |
|
|
Fixed charges: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
29.0 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
$ |
70.9 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Interest portion of leases |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
|
$ |
43.9 |
|
|
$ |
120.4 |
|
|
$ |
95.7 |
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
Certain prior year amounts have been restated to reflect the change in method of accounting for inventory from last-in, first-out (LIFO) to
first-in, first-out (FIFO) for certain businesses operating in the U.S.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing earnings by
fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of income before taxes plus fixed
charges and amortization of capitalized interest, less capitalized interest. Fixed
charges consist of interest expense, capitalized interest and the portion of rent expense
(estimated to be 35%) on operating leases deemed representative of interest. |
46
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
Avery Dennison Corporation
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, Dean A. Scarborough, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avery Dennison Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dean A. Scarborough
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dean A. Scarborough |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
November 6, 2008
47
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
Avery Dennison Corporation
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, Daniel R. OBryant, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avery Dennison Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel R. OBryant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel R. OBryant |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance, and |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
November 6, 2008
48
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
Avery Dennison Corporation
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER*
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Avery Dennison Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to the best
of his knowledge, that:
|
(i) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended September 27, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. |
Dated: November 6, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dean A. Scarborough
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dean A. Scarborough |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The above certification accompanies the issuers Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and is furnished, not filed, as provided in SEC Release
33-8238, dated June 5, 2003. |
49
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
Avery Dennison Corporation
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER*
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Avery Dennison Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to the best
of his knowledge, that:
|
(i) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended September 27, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. |
Dated: November 6, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel R. OBryant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel R. OBryant |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance, and |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The above certification accompanies the issuers Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and is furnished, not filed, as provided in SEC Release
33-8238, dated June 5, 2003. |
50